![]() |
Pages (2): [1] 2 » Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Charlies Angels: Full Throttle *SVCD* *INTERNAL* - CAM - loGisTic (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=22354)
excelent.
fast (as always), very good video, and bearable audio.
8/5/x
Just turn down your speaker volume a bit, and its ok.
The fact that they labeled it internal, shows that this group care about quality.
Other groups would have labeled this ts, and released it, not giving a shit about the source, witin a second,
considering this is a first release, of a very anticipated movie.
Two Thumbs up for -loGisTic. 
Video quality sucks , eh what cna u expect from a cam - 4
audio was very bad as well from sample atleast -4
i dont like rating movies - *NA*
Wait for something better, the audio is poor, although it is better than some CAM's, it is bearable if you really wanna watch it. The video is a bit bright and the colors are kinda washed out. Great speed, keep up the work!
::5/4/NA::
__________________
Banned for repeatedly advertising pyramid schemes in signature.
Quality and speed of a release is important as you well know.
you have proven it in the past wtf.
rating :
video X 5 sample
sound X 5 sample
movie in 20 min I will see!
:: Don't Bash Nor Complain please.
Video is pretty nice actually, the sound isnt bad, not hollow, just tinny. for a cam its a 7/8/x ill be leechin it as for its perfectly watchable and good pre...Sound got an 8 cuz its good for a cam, nothing is wrong with it, just a lil hiss and sort of tinny but then agn, 3/4 of tcf's TS are like that..
__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit
this is a pre so im not gonna be picky but.... sound isnt that bad jus cammish which is what this is and kinda similar to there 2f2f rls sound
video on the other hand is dark and colors are a little washed out
but its a pre so im not gonna complain thanx u guys
6/7/?
__________________
quote:
Originally posted by deftones6
How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????
Well it is a cam.
I hate to say this but I think it looks descent. Good enough to watch. Its kinda dark but you can still tell what is going on.
From the sample: the sound is 'ok', I mean, you can hear and understand most of what is being said but it sounds like 'eckoish' with a high pitch to me. Wierd.
6.5/4/X
*From film*
Subs at bottom of the picture.Very zoomed in but to be honest this is a great first release.Can't wait to see this (only for the women mind).the MTV movie awards showed their arse's loads i just hope this film has bit's like that in it.Will definately slap the salami over Cameron
.
Sound is what you what you would expect for a cam so no complaints there.
Well done LoGiStic liking your work lately.
rated as a cam remember
vid - 6
audio - 5
film - spank that monkey!
__________________

video quality is very decent especially for a first release 1 day pre US release and even more for the rest of the world, sound is good enough to listen to, not great but understandable, logistic did a nice job on this one, continue the good work guys!
7/6/?
the audio is hollow, like your normal cam. and the pic is blurry and has dull colors. i won't even be picking this movie up period, not waiting for a better release, just not this movie. the movie just looks too bad, since tom green won't be in this one I won't watch it for the 2 minutes of "The Chad".
6/4/? (Guessing a 3 on the movie 1 for Cameron Diaz, 1 for Lucy Liu, 1 for Bernie Mac, 1 for Demi Moore, -1 for Drew Barrymore that equals to 3)
If this came out a week ago, then I'd grab it. Since the movie comes out "for real" tomorrow, I'll see it in the theater then wait for a better version to dl and burn. But going by the sample this is a very watchable rls if you just can't hold your load.
Sound isn't great. I've heard worse. Video isn't that great...but watchable.
For a movie like this I'm not gonna spoil the the first viewing experience with this rls. That's just me...
__________________
My YMDB page
http://www.ymdb.com/user_top20_view.asp?usersid=18281

not bad
not bad...pic is fine, and there is a little static in the audio in the beginning, but for gawd's sake, it is a CAM, so not bad (at all) for a CAM...
EDIT: ACK, you see 2 ppl walk out the theater at the end, ack! Why didn't they cut that out? Now I wish I had given it a 6 for video....
this grp is getting much better! good rls for a cam
6/5/dunno
Good video but audio a little too poor. As for the film its ok 7/4/5.5
decent video and ok audio..cant complain since its pre
keep up the good work though!
Not bad at all for a pre-release. Remember guys this is a CAM! and for a cam it's pretty good.
7/6/7
Can Somebody Here Please Post Charlie's Angel's 2 On Kazaa
This Is 4 The People Who Download The Movie Charlie's Angel's 2 Please Post It On Kazaa 4 Other People 2 Share Please Thanks
:: edit Banned -M$
OMG i may never stop laughing at LovingComedy
Anyways i digress... from sample, good cam, 7/5/? Think i'll be going to the cinema to see these ladies in all thier glory 
1: A bad Ts even for a pre. Video is watchable but poorly cropped and angled. Audio is full 'o bass and staticky at parts. Wait for 1 of the 10 other copies that will be released shortly; it's a bad movie to boot. There are however 3 good reasons if youre a guy to watch this 
2: Post this on Kaza, wtf? On 1 hand I say let the Kazzers wait a week like usual and DL their 2 or 3 copies with a black screen before getting a downsampled TMD re-encode. On the other hand i'm sick of Noobs taking my ques, asking dumb questions and DL'ing a .bin and .cue they have no idea how to use. A catch-22? Either way the regulars are gonna post hatful remarks to Loving Comedy's post (as they should).
what can u say its a cam good to watch if u can take it but not to keep
6/6/?
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM. | Pages (2): [1] 2 » Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.