VCDQuality Forums - Matrix Reloaded *REPACK* - DVDRIP

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Matrix Reloaded *REPACK* - DVDRIP - Pr0nStarS (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=25621)

Posted by MQ-James on 08-09-2003 11:41 AM:

nice release, atleast they remembered to crop it, sound is slightly low
8/7/10

props on early release!

(took a while to add lol)

Posted by Bob Cock on 08-09-2003 11:57 AM:

Matrix Reloaded *REPACK* - DVDRIP - Pr0nStarS

Excellent picture, very nice sound. Perfectly mediocre movie.

Posted by kokot on 08-09-2003 12:19 PM:

finaly the best release of matrix reloaded!
and its dvd rip, not dvd scr, so no labels!

Posted by Alex2003 on 08-09-2003 01:34 PM:

one problem

i dont get it why they down sampled the birate of audio and video
strange

: the minds of divx kids are mysterious places -pho

Posted by upur0 on 08-10-2003 12:07 AM:

Re: one problem

quote:
Originally posted by Alex2003
i dont get it why they down sampled the birate of audio and video
strange

: the minds of divx kids are mysterious places -pho

LOL, i got me a new sig.
9/10/9 nice rel. I am grabbing this one right now, I am getting this divx rel instead of my regular svcd, because ever since i got my xbox, i have started to love divx.

Posted by harrybozack on 08-10-2003 12:19 AM:

Here are some screen caps from the sample:

Great release. I didn't believe it was really DVD rip until I saw it.

8/8/10

Posted by Ristox on 08-10-2003 11:39 AM:

Very enjoyable release indeed.. Couldn't wish for a better one, actually Picture's almost perfectly crisp and clear - though I'd imagine the sound could be a bit better (a little higher bitrate..) cause at the moment there's plenty of room for extra sound quality on both CD-s (693 and 696MB current size..). But well.. enough whining - great and cool release - Problably the last one I was after for, when it comes to this movie Couldn't ask for more

One thing that annoyed before I got the release was that I couldn't find a sample.. So I doubt if they even made one? Anyways, went for the unknown and fortunately wasn't dissapointed

Posted by inquirer on 08-10-2003 08:00 PM:

They did make a sample, and it was quite nice.
The part where they are in the cadillac(however u spell that) attempting to get away from "the guys".

Posted by inferno12 on 08-11-2003 01:18 AM:

i thought that Matrix Reloaded will be released on 2 CDs, XviD with AC3, instead of DivX with VBR MP3. yeah... whatever, it's good. 10/9/7

Posted by RumRogerz on 08-11-2003 04:14 AM:

seriously, i cant really notice a difference in divx and xvid when i play my movies on my tv off my xbox (props to xbmp).
Speaking of which; this release is sick, very good job done, nice clear pic.. i can only imagine how long it took them to encode it

Posted by luckyluke80 on 08-11-2003 05:41 AM:

WOW!

Its here!! after waiting months i got it today good video....... just made it to svcd and great quality on my 36" TV sound good too! great job keep up the good work guys
9/9/8

Posted by basslin3r on 08-11-2003 05:49 AM:

mmmmmmm matrix reloaded
i think ill uncompress this divx then convert it to mpeg2 and burn it to dvd, its a movie definatly worth the effort.

Posted by inferno12 on 08-11-2003 03:37 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by RumRogerz
seriously, i cant really notice a difference in divx and xvid when i play my movies on my tv off my xbox (props to xbmp).
Speaking of which; this release is sick, very good job done, nice clear pic.. i can only imagine how long it took them to encode it

Maybe on xbox isn't a difference. Even if you play on a TV (with the TV-Out) there's no difference. But try to rip a movie, first DivX and then XviD, at the same size with the same audio bitrate and you'll see a difference.

Posted by morco on 08-12-2003 12:34 AM:

THIS IS NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i like the audio, in this one better than the AC3 in the XViD for 1 reason, cuz it was SOOOO low on my BRAND new SoundBlaster Audigy, wit true dolby 5.1. Played the divx, was nice and loud!, and very clear, the pic is baiscally the same on both.

anyway, flame me about SAYING vbr mp3 is better than AC3, but i dont care.

9/10/100000000000

__________________

Posted by inquirer on 08-12-2003 09:05 PM:

You must have mixed them up, cause i had this one and sound was very low.
With the xvid with ac3 sound was nice and loud.

Posted by Sudder on 08-12-2003 09:14 PM:

> THIS IS NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Shure, but ...
Shure vid & sound are really good, but: the riper wasted 202 !!! mb on the credits! - just the credits, excluding the preview. If he had coded them with less bandwith he could have used the AC3 track without reducing the vid-quality.
.. so good quality, never the less bad rip ... (how doe's one vote for sth like that ?)

Sudder

PS: I don't care that much for AC3, but I prefer having AC3, instead of wasting those 200 mb on the credits ...

PPS: if you wonder why cd1 is 1:17:21 and cd2 is 55:27 - take a guess where the videobw skyrockeded ..

Posted by inferno12 on 08-13-2003 12:19 AM:

i bought it already burned from a guy with $2. hehehe. that's Romania

Posted by bryehn on 08-13-2003 05:08 AM:

"the other one" isn't xvid

Matrix.Reloaded.DVDrip.DivX.AC3-ZEN

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Posted by ShortFuse on 08-14-2003 06:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by morco
THIS IS NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i like the audio, in this one better than the AC3 in the XViD for 1 reason, cuz it was SOOOO low on my BRAND new SoundBlaster Audigy, wit true dolby 5.1. Played the divx, was nice and loud!, and very clear, the pic is baiscally the same on both.

anyway, flame me about SAYING vbr mp3 is better than AC3, but i dont care.

9/10/100000000000

How can mp3 be better than AC3? isn't AC3 the exact same thing as the DVD? Aren't DVDs MPEG2/AC3? And there are 3 releases, the other, not mentioned is The.Matrix.Reloaded.2003.INTERNAL.AC3.XviDVD-TmN

Posted by bond on 08-15-2003 10:51 AM:

ac3 is only usefull for people who have a multichannel system, for anybody else its a waste of space (-> mp3/ogg/mp4 is better)

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page