![]() |
Show all 3 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- X2: X-Men United *AC3* *Recode* - DVDRIP - DiAMOND (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=25956)
why do this dvdripp and the DVL dvd ripp have NA ratings ?
they look extremly good to me..
or does no one care when its perfect? only when its half perfect?
quote:Most people here don't care about the divx section. It's all about the "new" movies that are still in theatres which excite these kids hence why the DVD/TC/SCREENER releases also have less comments than most TS/CAM releases. Bragging rights about having/seeing the movie first I guess but there are still a few of us posting about quality and quality alone. Back to this topic, the DVL version looks a little better in terms of sharpness, less blotchy like the nfo said. Maybe it's a combination of both xvid superiority to divx and one from real dvd and one from downsampled dvdr. Who knows, but I'd rate this 5/9/10 (for stolen source and less quality) and the DVL 10/9/10.
Originally posted by basslin3r
why do this dvdripp and the DVL dvd ripp have NA ratings ?
they look extremly good to me..
or does no one care when its perfect? only when its half perfect?
i think its that theres alot more to talk about if its a ts ... a dvdrip is either done properly and looks perfect ore messd up and deserves a nuke there istn much in between ... on a ts the quality differences are bigger and more obvious ...
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 PM. | Show all 3 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.