VCDQuality Forums - Freddy vs Jason *Read NFO* *NUKED* - SCREENER

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Freddy vs Jason *Read NFO* *NUKED* - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=26684)

Posted by Butch on 08-23-2003 11:37 PM:

Wow the blur and the timer are still there but the picture is far clearer than the workprint. No pixelation that i can see.Nice release man. Whats with the VOB files in with the sample (yes i did read the NFO).
7/7/6

__________________

Posted by ducklington on 08-23-2003 11:54 PM:

seen sample and have to agree -better than wp copy-
7/6/9

Posted by ams30gts on 08-24-2003 12:15 AM:

why was this nuked?

quality looks decent

Posted by revolution-x on 08-24-2003 12:19 AM:

nuked for exactly same serial blurs as nox workprint
we all knew this was comming mislableingzzz 7.5/8/8

Posted by pHo on 08-24-2003 12:22 AM:

and since when did a workprint HAVE to differ from a final cut? it doesn't.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by mew on 08-24-2003 12:40 AM:

If you read the nfo you would know its not same source, or rather the NOX was originaly from that source but through a few encodes and convertions got washed out and therefor looks like crap. Take a look in the sample dir and compare the two vob sources and you will know the diffrence. Since it doesnt seem to miss any scenes or effects I think labling it a wp wouldve been stupid, NOX probably did so because their source was messed up in the process and wouldve never have looked good enough to pass for a screener. Just my two cents

8/8/6

Posted by kronik on 08-24-2003 12:57 AM:

The release is a screener. It's better than the previous release.
8/8/8

Posted by Butch on 08-24-2003 01:42 AM:

*woot?*

Ok so the Nox VOB was in the sample folder to show the difference between the two.The word Nuke says there is something wrong with this release.This is the best release so far and people should know that.Audio is the same but the picture is far better then the workprint.Seriously nukes are handed out to the best releases for stupid reasons sometimes,just because people feel they have the power to nuke.

Ignore the Nuke people this is the one to get props to VideoCD

__________________

Posted by ducklington on 08-24-2003 01:50 AM:

absolutely pointless nuke
best release so far-whomever hands these nukes out has not got a clue

Posted by badboyz on 08-24-2003 01:52 AM:

best release so far although still a little blur

7/8/10

Posted by GaryX on 08-24-2003 02:22 AM:

7/8/6

Wish this was an SVCD would of been nicer.Movie itself wasn't terrible but I didn't like it and I've seen every nightmare on elm st.(1st is best) and some friday the 13ths(jasons my least favorite evil dude)

__________________
Don't Fear The Reaper

Posted by PiSSeD_WoMBaT on 08-24-2003 04:17 AM:

Quote by GaryX

quote:
Wish this was an SVCD would of been nicer.

A video tape has a resolution of 352x240 at 29.967fps for NTSC and 352x288 at 25fps for PAL so makeing it a SVCD (480x480 at 29.967fps or 480x576 at 25fps) would just be stretching the picture with no improvment in quality. So thats why NO Screeners are released as SVCD.

This rls should not be nuked, its better quality (kind of). Shouldn't it just be a *Dupe*?

Posted by morco on 08-24-2003 04:17 AM:

Yea i agree SVCd would of helped.

but better nonetheless anyway 8/8/9

__________________

Posted by Joynt on 08-24-2003 04:52 AM:

Previously Stated

quote:
Ok so the Nox VOB was in the sample folder to show the difference between the two.The word Nuke says there is something wrong with this release.This is the best release so far and people should know that.Audio is the same but the picture is far better then the workprint.Seriously nukes are handed out to the best releases for stupid reasons sometimes,just because people feel they have the power to nuke.

quote:
It wasn't nuked on any site that actually matters. Moving right along.

Well the reason there are rules in the scene is to help keep standards up and to make sure people get what they want. Just because it may be decent does not mean that you can just let it sliop through the cracks. I could release a ts of a movie, call it an scr, but even if it's a good ts it will be nuked, that's what rules are for.

Posted by GaryX on 08-24-2003 05:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by PiSSeD_WoMBaT
Quote by GaryX

A video tape has a resolution of 352x240 at 29.967fps for NTSC and 352x288 at 25fps for PAL so makeing it a SVCD (480x480 at 29.967fps or 480x576 at 25fps) would just be stretching the picture with no improvment in quality. So thats why NO Screeners are released as SVCD.

This rls should not be nuked, its better quality (kind of). Shouldn't it just be a *Dupe*?

Would be less pixels though and a tape looks fine full screen where as vcd full screen on my tv is obviously much less quality than the original tape.

__________________
Don't Fear The Reaper

Posted by bryehn on 08-24-2003 05:13 AM:

hrm...uhm....shit...i just finished watching the NOX release about 20 minutes 'fore i came across this one...better by a mile...well, half a mile anyways.

i don't use topsites, so i'm really not sure where/why this got a nuke...maybe mislabled, but still...prolly won't get better till an actual screener.

NOX was totally watchable, this one will get less bitching from my friends that expect a SCR the day after release.

the movie itself was some kick ass shit for a shitty "horror" movie...blew my expectations away...

based on VideoCD's sample...

7.5/8/7.5

NOX gets a 6/8/7.5 by comparison...

either way, it's good to go...

and as for SVCD...it'd be pointless on this...if you know anything about framerates/resolution, or VHS conversion, you'll surely agree.

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Posted by shak3 on 08-24-2003 05:43 AM:

definately a nicer print than the NOX version, but exact same runtimes...and the audio is pretty much the same...i ran the damn NOX release through 18hours of Noise Filter in TMPEG and came pretty close....LOL

this one, 8/8/9

Posted by S|n|ster on 08-24-2003 06:31 AM:

i hope this post will finally show.

Movie Ratings:

Picture - 7.5 (nice colors and quality the bar on the left and numbers arent that bad
Sound - 7.5 (nice and clear)
Movie - 5.8 (typical friday / freddy flick too predictable)

If your looking for a good quality release this is it great job!!!

__________________
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and a finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee

Posted by ugzkmk on 08-24-2003 07:45 AM:

does this by chance have the same dots in the frames as TCR release did? just curious if it in fact does have to do with tracking of which movies came where..

_

Posted by alpha_code on 08-24-2003 11:33 AM:

Video: This is the best so far..

Audio: No problems here either:

Movie: Excellent

Ok the pic is a little dark but then there are a lot off dark scenes. This foor me is the best rls of this movie that has been released.

7.5|8|9

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page