VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Star Wars: Episode 2 - Attack Of The Clones *iNTERNAL* - TELESYNC - HafVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=2797)

Ho Hum. Wonder what this could be then

damn thats fast

wonder

i wonder if this is any better then the ftf release might be never know

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message

i have a mental image of release group people all standing in the same line with their cameras

Stop wondering about the quality -- this is obviously a re-pack of FTF's version. I watched the FTF sample... it has the same odd-shaped rectangle screen that shows in these jpegs (but not in FTF's jpegs).

I checked them out-- the only other "release" from "HafVCD" this year was a NUKED "screener" of HOW HIGH (rated about 3/4/~).

Re: HafVCD are major losers-- with a FAKE RELEASE

quote:

---

Originally posted by brr8760
Stop wondering about the quality -- this is obviously a re-pack of FTF's version. I watched the FTF sample... it has the same odd-shaped rectangle screen that shows in these jpegs (but not in FTF's jpegs).

---

brr8760 how can u say it's a repack? i watched both samples, wtf u talkin about the odd shaped rectangle screen? if u really watched it, you would have seen a little black line on the right of one, and the hafvcd is a trapezoid shape, im not saying either is 'good', although in the hafvcd one, you could obviously see a quality difference in faces. I can't assume u looked only at the jpegs, but damn it sounds like it.

The facial expressions i was referring to, was the ftf's sample w/ the white corridor and the kid walking(very fuzzy) and the war-room in hafvcd's(clearer, but still quite fuzzy).

i disagree...this is kind of crisper then the ftf because u cant really read the subs in the ftf...in this one u can.

Also, the audio only comes out of one speaker, but if u MUX (take the sound from the ftf and lace over this one) it should be better

IMO

look cool

Look better than FTF.. but i cant give comments with only the JPG

*INTERNAL*
what the heck that mean anyway- ok i uess that sounds well nooobie etc -
dont wanta a shitty answer just a *proper* 1 please
all you smark-fookers can abstain-
thx
-=apache=-

same source as FTFs, same audio errors at the same spots. had this version 2 days ago, as TuCVcD (but there was just the sample floating around, havent seen the full rls). bad quality, way too blurry.

Star.Wars.Episode.2.TS.iNTERNAL-HafVCD

Getting this now, i hate to waste cdz.... dunno which if any i should watch........

Some ppl on this board are thick as shit. Let me explain one or two things. This is not a repack of FTF release nor is it from same source (if you even suggested this then pls go point at yourself in a mirror and laugh.) The reason it's an internal is because the group did not believe the quality was good enough for a proper release. Picture quality looks better than FTF release as is sound but unfortunately its only mono thru the left speaker.

Still a decent rls imo and I know ill be watching it.
tooner

PS everyones expecting a centropy release soon and it might be worth waiting for if the quality is anything like spiderman.

Re: wonder

quote:

---

Originally posted by PhAnToMs
i wonder if this is any better then the ftf release might be never know

---

Star Wars: Episode 2

Maybe you can just download it, and stop argueing about quality etc. It's pretty amazing that somebody took the effort in shooting at in a cinema at all....

You have to have a pretty good Newsgroup program, such as Newspro. Because this theater-rip is being posted in the
alt.binaries.vcd newsgroup you may want to apply a filter first for the following keyword:

ftf-swep

success....

LOL

re : Squeaky
>" i have a mental image of release group people all standing in the same line with their cameras "

How is the Movie????

Enough about the quality of these 2 releases....How is the actual movie????

excellent release, better than ftf
watched cd1 so far

Release gets 2.5/10 from me, FTF one gets 2/10.

Bring on the 3CD SVCD From Centropy.

/me whishes

Does not look like a re-pack.

I have only gotten as far as downloading the mpg samples, but they look totally different. One is even taken at a different angle.