VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- School Of Rock - CAM - FTF (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=29411)


Posted by BloodyGrape on 10-04-2003 03:20 AM:

sweet
been waitin for this one, hope its a keeper

__________________
I never met a beer I didnt drink

GO LEAFS GO


Posted by MpegMan on 10-04-2003 03:25 AM:

It’s a cam and it’s FTF. Its better then UMS’s subbed cam, but that’s not saying that much. I was going to see the movie tonight but whatever.

5/4/x


Posted by dr0832 on 10-04-2003 06:27 AM:

I give this a 3/3/0 because jack black is a homo sexual


why do these morons in ftf waste there lives releasing shitty copies of movies? Can anyone please answer me? I mean who cares if you release the movie 1 week or 2 months early if you can't watch it and enjoy it because the quality is so shitty. Why don't you just nuke everyone of their releases until they figure out they should up the quality or find a new hobby to fill there useless lives.


Posted by lifebringer on 10-04-2003 06:30 AM:

havent seen this release, dont care, but saw an advance screening last week - great movie. VERY pleasantly surprising. (so yeah... mods you can delete this post if you want lol)

worth paying for!


Posted by tearz on 10-04-2003 09:45 AM:

*shakes head*

man i don't know why i wasted the bandwidth to download the sample... yet alone the first CD

oh well it's a cam... can't expect much
oh well it's a ftf rls... can't expect much

props on speed
i want to kill you for killing the movie tho

2/2/8


Posted by GeNeTiX on 10-04-2003 03:51 PM:

yikes
and whats this all about? 'PASSWORD FOR RELEASE IS nottoday' get real ftf, you think someone might steal this?
waste of time

__________________


Posted by morco on 10-04-2003 06:09 PM:

i have to disagree wit every1, i enjoyed this rls. The colors were good, but there was a tilt, but after a while u got used to it. (atleast i did). The only complaint bout the video, is that it got very pixally when they were alot of people in the scene otherwise it was good. The audio was good enuff to understand wat was being said. The only time u got the feeling it was a cam, was when some of the music was playing other than that it was fine.

i think the ratings are harsh.

6/6/8 the movie was pretty good, i liked the little bits of rock history they put in the movie.

__________________





Posted by MTV on 10-04-2003 09:09 PM:

Thank god for samples.... pls if you want to watch this 1. wait ! ! !

3 / 3 / ? <-- dont normaly give opinion on sample alone but its just not good guys. save that b/width.


(¯`'·.¸(¯`'·.¸©©B.M.P - M T V ©©¸.·'´¯)¸.·'´¯)©


Posted by morco on 10-04-2003 09:13 PM:

i kno why u guyz are rating this so low! Its cuz in the sample there are alot of people, which causes pixalation, due to CBR and low-bitrite VCD, get the first cd, and skim thru it, an u can see that it deserves a six!

__________________





Posted by sirghost on 10-05-2003 02:46 AM:

For those who didnt rate this by sample and rated it from the 1st cd or whole release forgot to mention one little thing...they packed it as mpg rather then bin/cue..thought that was usually an auto nuke on most sites..oh well..

typical ftf quality 4/2/1 mono audio???? what in the hell is wrong with this group..they seem to of not been able to get alot of thier releases done properly...

__________________
Signup today at www.citywidehost.com, and Use the Discount Code: "SG50" (without quotes) for:
50% OFF YOUR FIRST MONTH


Posted by morco on 10-05-2003 04:10 AM:

holy crap am i the only 1 that enjoyed this rls????!

__________________





Posted by brandonx on 10-05-2003 08:35 AM:

I enjoyed the film, but am waiting for a better release. Judging from CD1 - 4/3/10


Posted by putnam on 10-05-2003 02:55 PM:

For those of you that are bashing the film, have you actually watched it?

I'm sure there's a reason it got A's across the board from critics everywhere. Just because you think that "Jack Black is a homo sexual" (it's one word, by the way) doesn't mean that the movie sucks.

I think that Elton John is a homosexual, but Tiny Dancer is still a cool song...


Posted by fishkeepr on 10-05-2003 04:28 PM:

Very poor quality

unwatchable ,

3/1/x


Posted by knweedo on 10-05-2003 06:01 PM:

The quality was pretty bad, but it was watchable. Audio was kinda rough, but it was fine for most of it(music was painful sometimes). 5/4/8. Pretty cool movie.


Posted by Klonin on 10-05-2003 06:39 PM:

Sound had to much bass in it. Video was so so. Just because it was FTF everyone is down on it.


Video - 6 - not bad
Audio - 5 - needed adjustment
Flix - 4 - Jack Black rules, but this flix sucked


Posted by morco on 10-05-2003 07:49 PM:

Yea ur right Klonin, every1 is down on it because it is FTF.

__________________





Posted by sirghost on 10-05-2003 07:53 PM:

The reason we are bashing it is because ftf is known to fuck things up..and this is a fine example of them fucking it up...

__________________
Signup today at www.citywidehost.com, and Use the Discount Code: "SG50" (without quotes) for:
50% OFF YOUR FIRST MONTH


Posted by morco on 10-05-2003 07:55 PM:

its good enuff to watch, the only fuck up, is that its in MPEG not in bin/cue.


.::P.S. I gotta stop posting in this thread ::.

__________________





Posted by alphaimpulseuz on 10-06-2003 02:21 AM:

4.5/2/7

pretty good movie

this release isnt that great, sound is scary when they play music

i am not hating on it automatically because its FTF but because of the shit they release


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.