VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King *NUKED* *PROPER* *READNFO* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - MPT (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=32200)


Posted by firefighter on 12-21-2003 06:41 PM:

-Judging by Sample-

The Picture of this movie, the colors were faded , looks cropped but the picutre *widescreen* is nice and clear. The Sound , ermm it sounds like the speakers were about 10 feet away from the CAM . Has a loud echo to the sound. Overall in my opinion - I'll Stick with loGisTic.

6/6/10

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by scamtan on 12-21-2003 06:52 PM:

possible nuke due to bad sound

picture is better however sound is bad still

8/6/10

will stick to logistic 2 i think


Posted by pezley on 12-21-2003 06:54 PM:

Altho its a nice screen size and all that, id still stick with logistics.

colorless (only slightly ) but very dark flicker at points. audio is great if its a cam, but for a ts, sounds very distant, but quite clear.

anyways , actually a very nice pic very clear just a bit dark , cam didnt pick the colors up well enough ... but overall not bad, cropping isnt that bad either.

if sound was better, the release would be quite good


Posted by Cytrax on 12-21-2003 07:00 PM:

Checked the sample and would have been nice if they had made the aspect a little larger nevermind tho, audio is a bit echo echo echoie but never the less some great work by MPT as they have been providing some great work lately


Posted by rappa on 12-21-2003 07:16 PM:

wow they propered a real ts with a shitty cam..rofl...the pic is faded and the sound is horrible...and btw, i watched all of logistics and idk where they got 8 minutes was missing cause it was all there

5/1/20

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by Jdigital03 on 12-21-2003 07:20 PM:

from sample 7/6/10

not bad but i dont think its much better than logistic's so ill stick with that one till something else comes along!

lotr \m/


Posted by firefighter on 12-21-2003 07:22 PM:

I noticed on CD2 a quick Scene Change (probably changing tapes) on loGisTic's copy right when They left to enter the tunnel. I wouldnt say 8 minutes is missing though, and Still much better then -MPT's copy .... but ya i seen this nuked a few places now with reasons "not.proper.enough.to.be.a.proper" or "proper.not.needed". Guess the nfo didnt help.

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by lkzsky on 12-21-2003 07:30 PM:

hi

i just noticed logistic release is 2520 kbps and there are 4 CDs
same with MPT
and MPT has 2000 kbps and they still fit 4 CDs

there might be more than 8 mins missing scenes if we think it logically


Posted by crackerjax on 12-21-2003 07:30 PM:

Nice Try MPT, very nice Camera work, needs a bit more on the sound to be a true "proper." ... like almost everyone else that commented on this forum on this release ... I'll be sticking with logistic's release ... prolly until the dvdscr.

keep 'em coming MPT, practice makes perfect


Posted by scamtan on 12-21-2003 07:42 PM:

NUKED


Reason : Cam Audio


Posted by xboxfanz on 12-21-2003 07:42 PM:

this 8 minutes missing....is it important to the story of the movie???


Posted by Movieguy on 12-21-2003 07:51 PM:

Logistics is as follows According To My Apex

Cd1 = 49 mins 4 secs
Cd2 = 49 mins 34 secs
Cd3 = 49 mins 4 secs
Cd4 = 44 mins 10 secs

For A Total Of 191 Mins 52 Secs

Nfo and Imdb Both State This Movie To Be 201 Mins So Looks Like Logistics Rls Is Missing 9 Mins 8 Secs

I Will Stick With Logistics Rls (Allthough 9 Mins Missing Is Alot)


This one has not to great sound and picture isnt better then Logistics

6/6/?


Posted by Voc on 12-21-2003 08:03 PM:

from sample i would stick with logistics
quick Q but why cant these groups list the missing scenes would make life alot easier for us rather than just say "XX mins missing"


Posted by Vaelek on 12-21-2003 08:11 PM:

Angry There will be NO DVD Screener of ROTK

Hey guys. To all of you that are waiting around for a dvd screener don't hold your breath. There isn't going to be one this time around, if you want proof check out http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies...-dvd-side_x.htm it's gonna be vhs only on this one.


Posted by egoiste on 12-21-2003 08:12 PM:

MPEG2, PlayingTime=60.133s, Bitrate=0bps, PtsOffset=0726s, 8073 packets

Video Stream: Motion Video, 480x480, 29.97003fps (NTSC), 2520kbps
Audio Stream: Audio Standard MPEG layer2 Stereo, 44100Hz, 224kbps

this is loGisTic's sample info
if sample and rlz is the same
caculate the 4CD's capicity logistic's rlz less than 180min
or their bitrate less than 2000K


Posted by TwoPoundGiro on 12-21-2003 08:17 PM:

Does the 201min runtime include end credits.


Posted by Jurai on 12-21-2003 08:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Voc
from sample i would stick with logistics
quick Q but why cant these groups list the missing scenes would make life alot easier for us rather than just say "XX mins missing"



quick Q but why cant you be grateful instead of bitching


Posted by EmPreSS on 12-21-2003 08:51 PM:

Yeah it's missing the end credits probably. IMDB lists the COMPLETE run time so if logistic's doesn't have the end credits then you can conclude they still have "the movie".

Personally, I'm not gonna take a ts of this film. But, I wanted to comment on the missing minutes.

__________________
My YMDB page
http://www.ymdb.com/user_top20_view.asp?usersid=18281


Posted by bob0r on 12-21-2003 08:53 PM:

Logistic was missing NO video at all, or MPT has an OTHER version, but i seen no missing scenes

0/0/6
0/0? banned group, NEXT
6? not my style


Posted by Superxero on 12-21-2003 09:03 PM:

im pretty sure the 8mins are the credits because on the last two movies the credits were 9mins

__________________


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:34 PM. Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.