VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Blade 2 - SCREENER - TEG-VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=3293)


Posted by gnosis on 05-30-2002 07:45 PM:

teg is doing good on the screeners, but they suck with all those messages scrolling around everywhere

keep em coming teg


Posted by MaSTaBLaSTa on 05-30-2002 07:46 PM:

damn 3 serials (or anything other they gotta hide) on 1 tape
but other than that quality is pretty sweet


Posted by PenisXX on 05-30-2002 08:29 PM:

there are no teg-serial-blocks, they blurred them away this time. nice!


Posted by gangsta on 05-30-2002 09:27 PM:

yo

sup with the 3 blurred spots in it? it's nice if not for them.


Posted by Ren on 05-30-2002 10:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PenisXX
there are no teg-serial-blocks, they blurred them away this time. nice!


NICE?? it looks bloody awefull


Posted by PenisXX on 05-30-2002 10:33 PM:

eh...? no, it doesnt.


Posted by Nick on 05-30-2002 10:38 PM:

SERIAL?

can i ask what is a SERIAL?...


Posted by Ren on 05-30-2002 10:56 PM:

eh, what?? damn you need your eyes testing


Posted by NeRo on 05-30-2002 11:05 PM:

lol

i agree with Ren. That blurred shit makes this release a piece of shit, and anyone in their right mind would say the same thing. i mean, wtf? lol DUH


Posted by krazyfoo on 05-30-2002 11:12 PM:

i prefer blurs over blocks.. but whatever :P
least its not Teg 0wnz J00


Posted by Cerial on 05-30-2002 11:20 PM:

it any better than the svcd pdvd?


Posted by Generation X on 05-30-2002 11:23 PM:

how come there isn't any jpg samples for this or death to smoochy both appearing today on vcdquality. did they stop now or did they not get the samples or something? and i also preffer the blurring over the blocks.


Posted by PenisXX on 05-30-2002 11:27 PM:

you guys are all so incredible lame, it's really amazing. what do you exspect? dvd quality? do you know what screener tapes are? they get tagged with serials for a reason. the quality of this vcd is pretty nice, video is great and sound as well. do you think grps would stop blocking serials just to please you morons? damn, get a life. if you dont likle the screener, don't get it. the serial-blur is mentionerd in nfo and you can see it in sample so just shut the fuck up and be happy someone rlses anything to you loosers.


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 05-30-2002 11:51 PM:

Teg Should really make this a SVCD the Quality will go Right To Top good movie but need release it on SVCD

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by Ren on 05-31-2002 12:12 AM:

lmao, go back to dalnet


Posted by Gurpinder on 05-31-2002 12:17 AM:

this screener looks horrid. looks washed and nasty and blurry. i like tegs idea of blurring rather than blocking out the watermarks tho. i dont really think it made much difference for this fift generation tape (or whatever they used) but its a good idea. Teg is definetly an excellent group, but this and spiderman wasnt up to their usual standards.

if this sounds ungreatful, dont get me wrong. i appreciate their releases ALOT. but this one was shit.


Posted by PenisXX on 05-31-2002 12:27 AM:

hahaha, Ren, you're so leet. quick, shortbus is waiting.


Posted by NeRo on 05-31-2002 02:59 AM:

PenisXX...

dude i don't think anyone was bashing TEG for releasing this. lol - the only thing lame is how sometimes people feel the incredible need to appear superior. I don't know about you, but my dick is a good size lol. know what i mean? we are supposed to give our opinions on the release so long as we don't try and flame a group, and I think that was exactly what was being done. basically, i'm just saying that you should calm your little ass down a bit, buddy lol. Just relax, this isn't that serious to be calling people losers and lame and shit cause they don't like big ass blurs in a release.


-=NeRo=-


Posted by Generation X on 05-31-2002 03:08 AM:

this is more terrible than the first release by some group i forget who was. it was a ts too that first release which is weird cuz screeners are usually better (correct me if i am wrong). well bad quality, but the blurring is a good idea. should have gotten the sample instead of the first part. oh well nothin's perfect at least it's watchable at that small 100% size.


Posted by gnosis on 05-31-2002 03:12 AM:

bah!


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40 AM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.