VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Count of Monte Cristo - SCREENER - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=343)


Posted by FrAzZmAN on 01-26-2002 01:54 PM:

Kinda expected better from Centropy, the aspect ratio is a bit awkward on this rls and the sound is fairly average. The picture is reasonable but a bit to bright in some spots, overall its alright nothing great.


Posted by fatblack on 01-26-2002 02:47 PM:

Red face a centropy run tings!!!

though i am yet to see this movie, and just looking at the jpg on this website...i think this is a pretty good release, i have faith in centropy...they usually do good work... besides people, it's bootleg, free...why should i complain...if u complain about this rip...maybe you should start ur own ripping group...hey, i just tell it like it is


Posted by DMBFiredancer on 01-26-2002 04:27 PM:

Had to see this in the theatre yesterday since It was one of the few books that I liked that I had to read in school, great story, great movie... Quality looks pretty good


Posted by kansk on 01-26-2002 04:34 PM:

Re: a centropy run tings!!!

quote:
Originally posted by fatblack
though i am yet to see this movie, and just looking at the jpg on this website...i think this is a pretty good release, i have faith in centropy...they usually do good work... besides people, it's bootleg, free...why should i complain...if u complain about this rip...maybe you should start ur own ripping group...hey, i just tell it like it is


if you havnt seen it.. DONT POST!


Posted by fatblack on 01-26-2002 09:51 PM:

Angry whatever kansk....

yo kansk, don't bombo claat tell mi wah fi do my yute....if i want to write a post, i can and i fucking will, if u don't have anything to say about th fucking movie, like i did, then you don't fucking do a post!!!! it's stupid fucks like you who fuck everything up!! anyhow, much respect to all the groups, much respect to centropy, and i still think this is a good release.....


Posted by Norco on 01-26-2002 11:14 PM:

dude, we don't need to hear you guessing how you think it looks good by looking at the screencap. Dont make stupid posts either just about how your giving respect to the groups. Either post about the quality, or just keep it to yourself!


Posted by fatblack on 01-27-2002 04:12 AM:

Angry whatever...

norco, take ur own advice and shut the fuck up...at least i commented on the quality of the movie...u commented on the quality of my comment...who's the fucking moron here...my yute, go suck out your madda stinking, bombo claat pussy and leave i alone, pussyhole!!!!! this is still a good release...looks good, and yes you stupid fuck...i did see the fucking flick...go get it yall!!!


Posted by SprolicK on 01-27-2002 04:49 AM:

I was afaid this was gonna happen....

Fucking people, don't turn this into an isonews forum where you make enemies.. I think there should be some ground rules setup by x69 (the man himself).

Something like you must post on quality of rls, and if you want to add about quality of the movie itself, thats fine.. none of these "bitch, I'm your daddy and I'll kick your ass" posts.. its just pointless and a waist everyones time.

!Sprolick!
PS: this post shouldn't be classified as not about the movie and pointless because I have something to say that is important


Posted by rodney on 01-27-2002 06:28 AM:

yeah before i read SprolicK's post i was like damn this is going to start being like isonews. first of all, x69 should just make it where there is no cussing. there is no cussing needed to rate movies. if you disagree with someone just say you do and dont start yelling at them or telling them they are full of it. whoever does that should just be banned from posting and viewing the posts. x69 is doing a good job on the site as it is though, keep up the good work.


Posted by Norco on 01-27-2002 06:42 AM:

uhh oh, no cussing? That will nearly wipeout fatblack's total vocabulary!


Posted by pHo on 01-27-2002 08:58 AM:

i agree, either of you guys keep this up, and i'll ban you. i'll probably delete these posts later on to give you a chance to read this, but i'm not gonna let this turn into a flame war.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by dubie on 01-27-2002 09:17 AM:

i was pretty impressed with the video quality i think they did a good job. definately better than kung pow, that isn't very good. this is close to screener with some exceptions but i give props to centropy


Posted by fatblack on 01-27-2002 10:26 AM:

apologies....

my bad yo, i didn't mean to mess this up for everyone else...but if everyone would just write what they have to say...without someone else coming along and bashing it, then everything would be cool. i just started writing posts, so i'm new at this, but everyone is trying to jump down my throat....it's cool, i won't write stupid posts anymore, and i'll wait until i watch the movies next time....let's keep it clean from now on, if u don't like what i write, fine, don't read it, but don't go bashing my statements man, cause that just pisses me off...

*****notice that i'm yet to use a fucking cuss word, ooops


Posted by strange13 on 01-27-2002 10:24 PM:

ehh

its got the somewhat blueish tent in dark parts of the movie i think, as for the intro ctp is doing fuckin rocks!! keep up the nice releases and props on the speed of this one =)


Posted by Betrayed on 01-27-2002 11:12 PM:

Pretty good

I just watched the first disk and I too noted the blue tint in parts but other then that it is a very good and fast release.


Posted by grrkodiak on 01-27-2002 11:25 PM:

After watching the first CD I can say, thanks guys for the release. This is good enough in my book to enjoy. Keep up the good work


Posted by sonyman on 01-28-2002 12:56 AM:

Question IS this a wp

Movie was great and release was great, but is this actually a wp.
It is either a wp or the editing for the movie was terrible. counted over 36 mic shots, 3 boom shots, during the sona scene the lens actually got material on them. The first major fight scene had different screen size based on angle of shot. Its not the release but the acuall movie. Anyone else think this is a wp? Centropy great release either way. Even better if it is a wp.


Posted by Orky on 01-28-2002 10:19 AM:

Very nice release. Definatly word the bandwidth. There is some small blue tints at some places but not that annoying
Go Centropy And BTW, your intro rocks

__________________
,,|,, ^_^ ,,|,,
DISCLAIMER:
When I write "Havn't seen it yet" in a moviereview about a new release I mean that I havn't seen the whole movie, only the sample.
"Written to avoid accusations of only judging by jpg"


Posted by CFioren317 on 01-28-2002 02:54 PM:

Talking Great Release.

As usual, Centropy releases a good quality movie. The brightness in some parts is not too bad and neither is the bluish tint. And the sound was excellent...I must say that ever since the movie Vanilla Sky was ruined for me by some group who released a version with about 15 minutes missing, I have only watched 2 kinds of releases: 1) Screeners and 2) Centropy. Period. Thanks guys. Keep up the good work.


Posted by [cYk] on 01-29-2002 07:28 PM:

Another quality release by CTP, very good Audio - Video sync, although it definately was a chick flick.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 AM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.