VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Dawn Of The Dead *SVCD* *NUKED* - TELESYNC - ThP (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=38124)


Posted by crackerjax on 03-26-2004 08:06 PM:

Dawn.of.the.Dead.TS.SVCD.ThP

uhm, I've seen better, and I've seen a whole lot worse. The audio seems ok, the video is a little blocky, maybe better if kept a VCD TS, but who am I to say ... at least it isn't interlaced.

I hope to see more, this is ok, for now ... I can't wait until this version comes out on DVD, hopefully soon. w00t ... props to the release, thanks again

6/7/10! Long Live Romero


Posted by firefighter on 03-26-2004 08:08 PM:

Knew this was a nuke the second it pred for Dupe of iMPERIAL yesterday ... shoulda propered . Still curious picked up the sample. Damn iMPERIAL's was better then this. This looks like FTF's CAM with DTS audio and the same "hissing / buzzing" noises everyone cried about for iMPERIAL's copy. Overall i watched iMPERIAL's copy which was nice and this is a "misslabled proper / bad quality"

As a TS:
4/7/6

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by toked on 03-26-2004 08:27 PM:

Its not nuked for being a dupe of iMPERIAL because that release was nuked also, you cant nuke a release for being a dupe of a nuked release. Although the iMPERIAL rls was good enough.

This is nuked for being a mislabled cam.


Posted by Liife on 03-26-2004 08:58 PM:

Man, its sad when two groups release Dawn of the Dead TS'es and both are nuked. Not only that, they are beaten by a shitty FTF "ts".

Anyhow, shitty sound, blocky, but the film is fucking awesome.

5/4/10!

__________________


Posted by Yoda68116 on 03-26-2004 09:11 PM:

Man this is BS you would figure 1 release group would make a nice TS. i guess im going to the movies to watch this.

Audio: 4 hisses
Video: 4 real blocky not much better then the other releases.

Edit: After watching 30 min of cd 1 i had to shut it off. quality is real bad and the audio is even worse. had to turn t.v. all the way up just to hear most of what they were saying. also out of sync.

Come on UTi - TCF - TCR how about a real release


Posted by someth1ng on 03-26-2004 09:40 PM:

Mislabled CAM....the imperial rls was much better although it was cropped, a bit too bright in areas, and had fuzzy sound. Overall, this movie sucked ass, overrated shit.....I was very dissapointed. It's funny how the MPAA and Hollywood can actually bitch about piracy when they put out shit like this. Does it surprise them no one wants to pay for this crap, it's more like they are robbing us with these shit movies! Oh well.....it's too bad too cuz I really was looking forward to watching this flick for months!


Posted by crackerjax on 03-26-2004 09:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by firefighter
Knew this was a nuke the second it pred for Dupe of iMPERIAL yesterday ... shoulda propered . Still curious picked up the sample. Damn iMPERIAL's was better then this. This looks like FTF's CAM with DTS audio and the same "hissing / buzzing" noises everyone cried about for iMPERIAL's copy. Overall i watched iMPERIAL's copy which was nice and this is a "misslabled proper / bad quality"

As a TS:
4/7/6



no hard feelings or anything, but if you thought iMPERiAL's copy was nice, it was interlaced, cropped, and a CAM ... so I really hope you're either form iMPERiAL or they pay you or something, 'cause with all the interlacing I couldn't make out the film in their version. Also, a group shouldn't have to proper a NUKED release, I believe it's up to the group. I really have to wonder if you really watched the iMPERiAL release or not ... /me ponders the meaning of stupidity ...

/end rant


Posted by badboyz on 03-26-2004 09:52 PM:

4/6/8


Posted by ionizer on 03-26-2004 09:54 PM:

a whole week later and not one decent copy of this film
wtf is taking so long!!

__________________
-Ionizer


Posted by someth1ng on 03-26-2004 10:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crackerjax
no hard feelings or anything, but if you thought iMPERiAL's copy was nice, it was interlaced, cropped, and a CAM ... so I really hope you're either form iMPERiAL or they pay you or something, 'cause with all the interlacing I couldn't make out the film in their version. Also, a group shouldn't have to proper a NUKED release, I believe it's up to the group. I really have to wonder if you really watched the iMPERiAL release or not ... /me ponders the meaning of stupidity ...

/end rant



My turn to rant....no hard feelings or anything, but how can you possibly say imperials rls was a CAM? It looks like someone in THP has paid you or something to try and justify the shit they just put out. You are right about the cropping on imperials rls, but I don't think this rls is a whole lot better in that respect, plus the video of this rls is way worse. The audio is also way worse, you know, hollow and shit, like a CAM. Imperial's rls may have had a buzz to it, but that was a direct source for sure (certainly not the best source ever). One more thing, all this bitchin about interlacing, I ask you, what interlacing does everyone see? I didn't notice any motion blurr or white lines going through moving objects, which is usually associated with interlacing. If imperial's rls is interlaced, it sure as hell isn't that noticable to me where I'd say the video is unwatchable. I really have to wonder if you really watched any of the rlses or saw any of the samples at all. /me ponders if you are really a newbie f-serve lamer....

END RANT


Posted by commiewhore on 03-26-2004 10:08 PM:

hrmm, decent thats all i got, watchable...seen some posts comparing to imperial rls...i dunno, maybe bout par, cept this one is less cropped, picture less pixelelated..different strokes i guess, anyhow, audio is good from what ive heard in cd1...movie is ok, like everyone else ill say i hate it cause its not hte original then pour out in thousands to buy the original on dvd, then get suckered to buy this one on dvd....not bad, definitely most watchable rls available..someone stated that imperial audio had a buzz but was still direct...um, thats shome shitty feedback...both were nuked on some .us sites..but no need to fight...lets review

video = 5
audio = 7
movie = 7

/me throws up on irc commands.

can someone pay me something to write good reviews? cause i wont, heh


Posted by firefighter on 03-26-2004 10:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crackerjax
no hard feelings or anything, but if you thought iMPERiAL's copy was nice, it was interlaced, cropped, and a CAM ... so I really hope you're either form iMPERiAL or they pay you or something, 'cause with all the interlacing I couldn't make out the film in their version. Also, a group shouldn't have to proper a NUKED release, I believe it's up to the group. I really have to wonder if you really watched the iMPERiAL release or not ... /me ponders the meaning of stupidity ...

/end rant



hahaha lewser.
Im not with *any* release grps im not leet enough . I dont have any sources to supply anything unfortionatly or i would help our more. Paid to post i wish heh.
Of Course it was a iMPERIAL's was a CAM , arent ALL TS's CAMs , it was clearly Direct audio though you could tell if you watched it.
Who said iMPERIALS was nuked ? nforce , vcdquality ? your site? your dupe check channel . heh i didnt see it nuked 100% everywhere , only select places.
If you wondered if *I* personally watched iMPERIALs date back to iMPERIAL's forum thread and see what i posted do some research before your post kthankx.
/me proves the meany of stupidity.

Agreeded with "commiewhore - but no need to fight...lets review"

Anyway both are watchable unlike FTF's CAM - take what you can get and enjoy it as i dont *think* we will see another copy till Screener in a few weeks or we woulda already.

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by Chomp_on_this on 03-26-2004 10:25 PM:

Jesus...

Cant anybody put out a proper release for this? It's been a week and all we have had is a shitty Cam and 2 Nuked Telesyncs.

Dont even bother releasing this crap if the Cam released 5 days earlier looks and sounds better than yer telesync. Stop releasing for speed and start releasing for quality.

lame.

4/4/6

__________________
Well hello Mr. Fancy Pants!


Posted by AddNtoX on 03-26-2004 11:22 PM:

thp-dodts-svcd.sample.mpg

from sample...CAM period


Posted by Jc100 on 03-26-2004 11:23 PM:

Why all the bickering.. It doesn't take Einstein to figure out MOST of these "Ts's" and "CAMS" were done by my chin chang in china town.. Thats why its a freaking dupe. They all BUY the same source.... the groups with any contacts will dub over their own audio if they have direct feeds... BUT these groups dont it seems.. so stop bitching, you know what to expect... if you want to do better, go to chinatown and buy and encode your own copy, you can be a rl group too.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 03-26-2004 11:34 PM:

ok we have to except these shitty versions..because obviously TCR, FUJiTIVE, and MATiNE have fell off the map or just don't give a damn about doing this movie..... All the releases are poor. Imperial is the best version interlaced or not. But at least the sound is direct...this is a copy of FTF picture with fixes here and there and some filtered sound .Same oh! crowd laughing in the background and picture and colors are just f..k'd up period..

1/3/10 a 1 for the effort to even try to clean up the ftf version and re-release it as your own.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by DrunkMonk420 on 03-26-2004 11:43 PM:

it's funny how a movie that made $29 million at the box office and was number 1 last week cant have a decent release..... sofar we've gotten a very shitty FTF release (i'd expect nothing less from them) and then two NUKED releases... and thats it! seems like we might get a decent release in the next couple days...... i would hope......


Posted by Jc100 on 03-26-2004 11:59 PM:

I got an idea.. GO see it at the theater =) . I paid to see it, it was great. Good modern remake of the old ones... If you are truly that poor, then A) return your pc back to the rent to own store B) stop stealing your neighbors internet.. or C) shell out the money. Its well worth it... as all these copies are a waste


Posted by AddNtoX on 03-27-2004 12:22 AM:

fuck yea man i agree, go to the cinema and watch it already if ur DYING to see a good rls...the cinema is the way to go, jeez some tight fuckers on here. Only reason not to go see this and wait for a TS is if u havent got ur pubic hair yet and cant get in


Posted by DrunkMonk420 on 03-27-2004 12:48 AM:

yea it's def worth the money...... i liked it a lot... i also saw eternal sunshine at the theater that same night and that is one of the best movies i've ever seen.... i only downloaded taking lives though... i didnt feel like paying for that movie, i had heard it was a waste... but i actually kinda liked it....


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.