VCDQuality Forums
Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- Die Mommie Die *NTSC* - DVDRIP - booZerS (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=41979)


Posted by JoshNya on 06-17-2004 11:30 AM:

I really hate BooZerS nfo, tells you absolutely nothing. I'll wait till someone posts before I d/l and try it. Sample seems ok... but who knows..


Posted by porco556 on 06-19-2004 09:52 PM:

Two words on this release... Pure shit...

The whole movie full of interlacing problems and on a HDTV, it looks like crap. I watched it since I spent the time downloading it, but I gotta say, movies like this, should have had untouched video if they don't know how to encode an interlace movie.

And of course, they don't even mention anything in their NFOs. They probably don't know what to write since they obviously don't know how to encode.

Video 1/10 - Lowest of lows. I saw the problems already 1 second into the movie. Really disappointing.

Sound is sound... I doubt it was touched from the retail.

DVD-R */10 - If they did the encode properly, I would have given it 9/10 or 10/10... One time watcher movie though... But still a good effort on the keeping the extras


Posted by tupelo on 06-20-2004 01:36 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
Two words on this release... Pure shit...

The whole movie full of interlacing problems and on a HDTV, it looks like crap. I watched it since I spent the time downloading it, but I gotta say, movies like this, should have had untouched video if they don't know how to encode an interlace movie.

And of course, they don't even mention anything in their NFOs. They probably don't know what to write since they obviously don't know how to encode.

Video 1/10 - Lowest of lows. I saw the problems already 1 second into the movie. Really disappointing.

Sound is sound... I doubt it was touched from the retail.

DVD-R */10 - If they did the encode properly, I would have given it 9/10 or 10/10... One time watcher movie though... But still a good effort on the keeping the extras



Yea so many releases and so few fuck ups clearly means the group can't encode. Get off your high horse. I can paste some lines off the net and try to sound like i know what i am doing as well. On the other hand this release is poor. The encode is clearly messed up. This, however, is certainly not the norm for this group. Show some respect. 1/10/?


Posted by JoshNya on 06-20-2004 05:51 AM:

Damn... THANK YOU! I was just about to burn this too... glad I read this first. Mounted it, and walla! Interlaced up the butt.

man... dont these guys check their releases?


Posted by porco556 on 06-20-2004 07:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by tupelo
Yea so many releases and so few fuck ups clearly means the group can't encode. Get off your high horse. I can paste some lines off the net and try to sound like i know what i am doing as well. On the other hand this release is poor. The encode is clearly messed up. This, however, is certainly not the norm for this group. Show some respect. 1/10/?

What's up your ass crack... "show some respect" my ass. A fuck up is a fuck up and this is a major fuck up when the whole damn release is useless. Norm or not, it's complete garbage. This could have been avoided if they look at what they are releasing.

And secondly, I know how to encode and this shit release is inexcuseable, so get out of my face. I don't "cut and paste" from nowhere either. So enough of your bashing cuz it's total made up shit.

This once again is a beautiful example of how someone takes a review personally.


Posted by vip3r on 06-21-2004 06:22 PM:

And for all you whiners out there, BooZerS has done a repack of this movie. Took a little while, but they did it..so stop your complaining


Posted by porco556 on 06-21-2004 07:17 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
And for all you whiners out there, BooZerS has done a repack of this movie. Took a little while, but they did it..so stop your complaining

Glad to see the repack myself... I am sure they got it right this time for sure.


Posted by Kanabis on 06-25-2004 12:47 PM:

yea this group clearly doesnt know how to encode, seeing how they're one of the first groups to release shit in the dvdr scene and even before most of those crappy one-click programs that groups seem to like to use these days were even around. not to mention that this is the 1st thing of theirs i've seen nuked EVER. Inexcusable? Show some respect my ass? face it porco those were dickhead things to say and this group defintely deserves props. remember no one is perfect.


Posted by porco556 on 06-25-2004 04:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Kanabis
yea this group clearly doesnt know how to encode, seeing how they're one of the first groups to release shit in the dvdr scene and even before most of those crappy one-click programs that groups seem to like to use these days were even around. not to mention that this is the 1st thing of theirs i've seen nuked EVER. Inexcusable? Show some respect my ass? face it porco those were dickhead things to say and this group defintely deserves props. remember no one is perfect.

Talk about re-opening old wounds...

I'll be the first to admit I was tough on the release... But I stand behind that this release is totally fucked, and not taking a second to check your release is inexcusable also (I personally check video from the initial AVI before encoding and then the mpv after the encode).

But in life, you are branded by your mistakes... You can go out with a chick for 6 years, cheat once and you're fucked.

And your point is valid that this is the first nuke by boozers, and rest of their other releases were good. So I take back what I said that Boozers don't know how to encode, as they have proven themselves many times in the past as the most reliable group.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM.
Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.