VCDQuality Forums - The Day After Tomorrow *PROPER* *SVCD* - TELECINE

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Day After Tomorrow *PROPER* *SVCD* - TELECINE - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=42184)

Posted by pjfan281 on 06-23-2004 08:34 PM:

VideoCD,

please dont waste anymore time than was already wasted with this shit movie. focus your attention on more important things...perhaps a good version of Terminal? if not save the energy for spiderman 2

Posted by simonl85 on 06-23-2004 09:03 PM:

pjfan281, please don't waste any more time on this board unless you have something constructive to add to the posts about this release.

Rate the quality of the release ALONG with the quality of the movie if you feel it is necessary. Needless bashing of the movie without helping anyone to make a decision on whether to download the release is fucking pointless and will just make people want to set fire to you whilst shouting I AM THE WALRUS.

Kthx.

__________________

Posted by joeydownload on 06-23-2004 09:12 PM:

Well said simonl85,you only post on quality of print not arseholes moning ,he must be new !

Posted by wykidnk on 06-23-2004 09:16 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pjfan281
focus your attention on more important things...perhaps a good version of Terminal? if not save the energy for spiderman 2

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
[Second...]
NO REQUESTING FILMS,
3. Breaking the NO REQUESTING rule . INSTANT BAN.

As for this release, its pretty nice..

8/8/6

__________________
Click!

Posted by serj on 06-23-2004 09:29 PM:

been a while since i lasted posted, nows a better time then any before i get banned for inactivity lol

well i'm just as guilty here but I find this really funny...

simonl85 and joeydownload post a comment telling pjfan281, to not post unless it's about the release..well um look what you 2 just did...you think it makes you any better? no it makes you equal and i am right there with all 3 of you for doing this...

wow another release? but wait this one isnt nuked?
at this point i'll just wait for a dvd release or a nice looking screener, thanks for your time though videocd.

Posted by VCDz on 06-23-2004 09:34 PM:

I wish VideoCD released a DVDR version of their Telecine's with DD 5.1 surround like Replica does.

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i´m new...aand i´ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd´s"?

Posted by Darkness on 06-23-2004 09:55 PM:

simonl85: please dont waste time & space replying to other people pointless & idiotic posts..

Anyway,,

8/7/6

Posted by Bakkoda on 06-23-2004 10:00 PM:

8/8/2 - Better than average quaity for VideoCD in my opinion, sound is great and video is a touch blurry but not very pixelated.

Ill jump on the bandwagon. Gj Simon, a whole post about wasting posts and nothin said about the movie itself.

EDIT: kthx
Second EDIT: Everyone has an opinion on the quality but yet I'm the only one to actually rate it on the poll?

Posted by BiggD23 on 06-23-2004 10:02 PM:

At least they didn't flat out lie in the NFO about where they cut the ending this time...bonus points for that.

8/8/doesn't deserve a score

Posted by neatz on 06-23-2004 10:03 PM:

__________________
why bitch about the cost just switch to dvd-r "dam-it"

Posted by XXXBoX on 06-23-2004 10:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by VCDz
I wish VideoCD released a DVDR version of their Telecine's with DD 5.1 surround like Replica does.

Didnt they do that with Kill Bill Vol.2? Im sure the TC DVD-R was by VideoDVD! There should be no reason why this shouldn't be the same!

XXX

Posted by tr1pp1n on 06-23-2004 10:41 PM:

saw the movie in theaters... thought it was mediocre dont think ill be wasting my bandwidth on this..... anyways good job judgin from the sample.......
8/8/5.5

I h4x0r3d t3h g1bs0n

Edit: just on a side note, remember when centropy released spiderman ts in svcd, that is when everyone started this nonsense of save up your energy for a more worthy movie... I think that it should be shut up and be grateful, dont beg a group they will release what the see necessary and what the can get their hands on and lets leave it at that...
xilf is ugly....

__________________

The wise man does not play leap frog with unicorns...

Posted by pjfan281 on 06-23-2004 10:50 PM:

ok, for all the women who got their panties in a bunch for me not commenting on quality, here you go..

videocd release better than tun release? perhaps
videocd release better enough to warrant proper? no
videocd best release? for the bandwidth, yes, otherwise no get dvdr release

Posted by henriklarson on 06-23-2004 11:20 PM:

well said tr1pp1n they will release what they can and if peeps dont like it, dont download it.

videocd are on a roll now so why should they not improve the quality of there releases if they have the chance to.

goodjob videocd keep it up.

Posted by crackerjax on 06-23-2004 11:24 PM:

yes yes, run right out and waste some bandwidth on the DVDr that is out-of-sync.

Good job mate, you managed to make an ass outta yourself 2x in one thread, that seriously takes some talent. ... this is enought to warrent a proper, just to get rid of that nasty sidebar for those of us who are lazy asses and don't want to fix it ourselves, and have the bandwidth to waste. (not trying to offend, just stating and opinion) Besides the other was pixalated all to hell, and you could see more video blocks than in a vhs screener, it was pretty much not a TC, and if it was, then someone needs to re-read "how to encode 101."

Nice release VideoCD, scanning through CD2 now .... looks great, sounds nice ... bring on the TC.DVDR .... Go VideoDVD

/end rant

Posted by 00b1ar on 06-23-2004 11:26 PM:

aws0m3 ill dl it asap 9/9/9
u guys dont appreciate the quality of a flix
Movie Rocked

__________________
n1ce 00b1ar

Posted by pjfan281 on 06-23-2004 11:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crackerjax
yes yes, run right out and waste some bandwidth on the DVDr that is out-of-sync.
/end rant

still mixed reviews there. some same it's only sample, one person says its in the movie too. hasnt been nuked yet, so too early to tell. i wont waste time downloading it either way for such a lame movie. and for the record, slight imrpovements in video quality are not cause for a proper. any group can take an extra week and make the video look "less blocky". i saw the tun release and it was fine. this should have been an internal release and thats about it. later.

Posted by vip3r on 06-23-2004 11:35 PM:

Yeah good proper VideoCD..took awhile, but ya got it out..

9/9/6 - i'll have to think about downloading this one..

Posted by scousethief on 06-23-2004 11:45 PM:

in my opinion not a good reason for a proper shouldve been nuked. The tun version was a good enough version that played excellently on my standalone with very little pixelisation

i am going to base my score on the sample

8,9,6

Posted by Debo on 06-23-2004 11:59 PM:

another release of this shitty movie
8/8/5

__________________

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page