VCDQuality Forums - Super Size Me *Limited* *PROPER* *SVCD* - DVD SCR

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Super Size Me *Limited* *PROPER* *SVCD* - DVD SCR - FRA (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=45177)

Posted by pabelo on 08-01-2004 08:48 PM:

::Rate the quality. Is that so FUCKING hard for you people to understand?

Posted by Jc100 on 08-01-2004 09:27 PM:

Supposedly a nuke for interlaced and re-encode.. dling to find out... = / LETS HOPE NOT.. I WANT TO SEE THIS. Sample looked fine but ive seen many samples lie.

Posted by crawleygreen on 08-01-2004 10:05 PM:

hafVCD was nuked for interlace not this release
I burnt hafVCD release with Nero and it played perfect on my standalone
So I wont be getting this release

Posted by BudFern on 08-01-2004 10:34 PM:

Heck, the one that was nuked for interlacing plays great in my dvd player.

Posted by nzb-cop on 08-01-2004 10:58 PM:

[NUKED]REASON-interlaced.possible.reencode

both versions looked fine don't know how to rate svcd's

8/8/? so don't bitch bout my rating cuz there this yelling in my ear right know

Posted by kenh21 on 08-01-2004 11:06 PM:

I watched the entire Super.Size.Me.LIMITED.DVDSCR.SVCD-HafVCD from start to end.. And everything seemed just fine to me. I thought the picture quality was great, so was the audio.

Posted by Icedog on 08-01-2004 11:43 PM:

Looks fine to me.

8/9/N/A

Posted by binx on 08-02-2004 12:29 AM:

i agree.....

Posted by largenutz on 08-02-2004 01:11 AM:

NUKED BY WHO AND Y

I FIND THIS TO BE A FUNNY ONE SEEMS LIKE THE BIGEST BS NUKE ON THE NET

#1 NON INTERLACED
#2 NOT A RE ENCODE

AND WOW THEY PUT THE DVDR OUT TO PROVE THEY HAD THE DVD SCR I THINK FRA COVERD THE BASES TO PROVE THIS WAS A BS NUKE BUT U HAVE TO READ THE NFO HERE IS THE QUOTE FROM THE DVDR:

Note: All these damn nukes going on saying the svcd is
interlaced. Well here is the dvdr. Do it your
fuckin self.

Posted by dc_man on 08-02-2004 01:11 AM:

The Haf one was fine, should have not been nuked IMO.

This

8/8/8

Posted by psyche on 08-02-2004 01:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dc_man
The Haf one was fine, should have not been nuked IMO.

This

8/8/8

interlaced/bad ivtc or lack thereof is never ok. for average joe's "maybe", for videophiles definitely a no no... yea yea yea, the tv deinterlaces blah blah blah but it's still noticeable to some of us

nice job fra, 8/9/10... docu r rocks.

Posted by dslplaya on 08-02-2004 02:23 AM:

Shit after watching this movie, i now understand why the US has a bunch of fucking fat bitches walking around with greasy furburgers. Movie was ok, pretty interesting.
Sound and Video was decent for a telesync.

__________________
I play them online at night, i play them offline during the day, and im playing yours right now!

Posted by vip3r on 08-02-2004 02:30 AM:

As said above, it's supposedly nuked for being interlaced. I don't know if this is true as i've only viewed the sample, but i don't notice anything bad from it.

7.5/9/?

Posted by Jc100 on 08-02-2004 03:20 AM:

Seemed fine to me.. Ive wasted my day watching movies and bummin.. LOL and doing errands.. But this movie was fine, if there is interlacing its minor.. There is some artifacting but thats probably due to a handicam recording this at times and the digital process of going from dvdr ----> svcd.. Its fine. Suck it up kiddies. Good movie, poor guy... I figured by day 30 he would be on the ground twitching of a HUGE corranary... and Mcdonalds would have to be pumped into his vains to revive him.... Word to the wise, this movie makes you think. Its not for the no brained, pothead 13 yr old lookin to say, Duh i dont get it. Its a documentary thats geared more towards adults, that pass the knowledge on.. With that said, quality is nice.. a few For screening purpose messages. NO BW or other shit.. just a few quick and brief messages. ENJOY

Posted by thomas997 on 08-02-2004 03:44 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by psyche
interlaced/bad ivtc or lack thereof is never ok. for average joe's "maybe", for videophiles definitely a no no... yea yea yea, the tv deinterlaces blah blah blah but it's still noticeable to some of us nice job fra, 8/9/10... docu r rocks.

lol what kind of videophile would download rips from the net?

Had no problem watching it on TV or computer.

Dont see much improvement with this one over the other.

Posted by Mezt^Up on 08-02-2004 04:06 AM:

is it just me or is the ladt teg vcd rls messed up, i cant see the nfo or post a msg there

__________________

Posted by richardgearhead on 08-02-2004 04:43 AM:

this movie was shot on video, then transferred to film. there were noticeable interlacing artifacts when i saw it in the theater.

Posted by [H]ooKy on 08-02-2004 05:47 AM:

^^^ most sensible post about the interlacing I've seen.

If you cant see the interlacing you must not know what it is. It is very obvious.

Posted by hunters on 08-02-2004 07:51 PM:

I've downloaded and unrared the 2 svcd discs and when I go to burn the bin and cue with Nero (as I do with this type of download all the time), I get the error "cannot open the file D:/temp/image/subs/haf-ssm-cd1.bin" Huh? and then the error "An error occured while loading the cue sheet file....line 1"

huh? Any thought, thanks

Posted by psyche on 08-02-2004 10:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by thomas997
lol what kind of videophile would download rips from the net?

that's like asking what kind of audiophile downloads rips from the net, there is one main thing in common... it's free, duh. no rip is gonna be perfect quality but most done these days could be alot better, where are the days of quality control? CTP/TCF/THCiSO/etc.

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page