VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Halloween: Resurrection *REPACK* - SCREENER - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4953)


Posted by Wesb0b on 07-17-2002 09:30 AM:

Props to FTF for finialy puttin out a REpack. This just made this release much better then the other one that was released. Still the fact that its a WP and not a SC but what can ya do, its a free movie, i just wish it was the correct movie.


Posted by wwftheman316 on 07-17-2002 10:37 AM:

cant wait to dl this and see how it is looks good for ftf one of there better release


Posted by ErBzZ on 07-17-2002 11:06 AM:

heh i got it.. lot better than last time but why so late.. =\


Posted by binx on 07-17-2002 02:08 PM:

very nice

n1


Posted by brr8760 on 07-17-2002 02:23 PM:

Awesome! Thanks FTF

Just what MM ordered-- FTF's was the better version, a decent screener, but it puked out 1/2way through CD2 (fast forwarding through the climax). If that's fixed, then I'm going to celebrate by taking out my favorite hunting knife and carving up some Christmas turkey. Except this ain't Christmas. And I don't expect to see any turkeys. Bwaahhaaaa.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 07-17-2002 02:23 PM:

Only Fixed

Alright, FTF get props for fixing their mistake on CD2, but I still wont waste cds on this rls, mainly because it's still a workprint with crappy quality. I would rather wait for an *actual* release of the movie that's watchable. Many groups out there have potential to rls good qual shit, so i'll bide my time.


Posted by Beelzeebub on 07-17-2002 02:57 PM:

Iam afraid no repack can fix this release.


Posted by brr8760 on 07-17-2002 03:42 PM:

quote:
Iam afraid no repack can fix this release ........ I still wont waste cds on this rls, mainly because it's still a workprint with crappy quality.
Are you people blind, or simply talking out of your newbie arses? I'm watching CD2 right now-- it's a FINE release, I wish ALL new movies had this level of quality. Great work, props to FTF. Please ignore the pre-judging lamers.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-17-2002 03:44 PM:

So were the problems properly fixed?

If so then im sure it makes for a very nice release even for a WP. Anybody they says the quality is shit needs to look again, if the picture and sound are like most od cd1 from the first release then its definatly worth the download.
Again if the problems were fixed, then im very glad to see a repack of this.

Edit: heh brr8760, guess that answered my question.
Edit2: is there a difference in the CD1s?

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 07-17-2002 04:24 PM:

Flaming

Well, everyone has their own opinion about releases. I think this *workprint* is bad quality, and brr8760 thinks its great. By the way, just because you live on the VCDQ boards and other people have lives, don't think that you are superior brr8760. Just because you have more posts here, don't think you rule the scene. No offence, but the boards are for the quality of movies, not about who's a newbie and who's not.


Posted by brr8760 on 07-17-2002 05:10 PM:

^0M3N ---> according to the nfo, CD1 was fixed as well (although I didn't have any problems with it personally that I remember)---> "The last release of this had some problems; the encoding for the end of cd1 and most of cd2 was "messed up", making it unwatchable. So enjoy the fully fixed/working version of this summer thriller."


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-17-2002 05:22 PM:

Yea i read the nfo and i personally didn't see much wrong with end of CD1, apart from a few glitches now and then in the last say 5 odd minutes.
Which is why i asked, no point waisting bw on CD1 if its the same thing.

Thanks for responding

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by drseuss on 07-17-2002 06:23 PM:

why VCD again?

If they went through the trouble to reencode the whole thing, why not rip it to SVCD??

Nice job on the recode, took a while though...


Posted by PizzaTheHut on 07-17-2002 08:01 PM:

Re: why VCD again?

quote:
Originally posted by drseuss
If they went through the trouble to reencode the whole thing, why not rip it to SVCD??

Nice job on the recode, took a while though...



because the source diden't warent svcd. put simply vcd is vhs quality with digital sound. svcd is dvd quality. so the truth is there is no point in encodeing to svcd when the source is of lesser quality then a normal dvd. it does nothing but make the files you have to d/l bigger. it would be nice if everyone would take thier blinders off and relize this


Posted by masta_spl on 07-17-2002 09:34 PM:

seriously ftf is lame , no reason it should take this long for a repack


Posted by dogbollox on 07-17-2002 10:13 PM:

Thumbs down

brr8760
They both suck, what are ya? , a NERD?!


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-17-2002 10:13 PM:

PizzaTheHut, high res DV sources can make good for SVCD encodes, as we all saw with you know who.

masta_spl, would you rather not have it? or perhaps have a repack the next day that isn't properly fixed?

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by saunders on 07-18-2002 03:43 AM:

Can someone who has seen both this release and the Legion TS tell me if they are from the same source, or if the Legion release is the theatre final (aside from the changed title)? I haven't sat down and watched either one yet (just got the repack tonight) and I didn't know if burning both of them was a waste of 2 perfectly fine cd-rs.


Posted by DJNICKJ on 07-18-2002 08:02 AM:

I have not read all the posts, but I must say, with all the bitching of people saying why bother re-pack this film... I personally think its great FTF are repacking it, I want a copy... and basically they dont have to do it if they dont want to, there are so many ungrateful people out there, are u actually paying for the movie??? NO??? well stop ya bitching OH and the thing that makes me laugh is if you hate this film so much why are u bothering to check these posts and writing ur useless crap??

FTF - thanks for the repack - i just gotta find it to download... hhehe


Posted by dizzyD on 07-21-2002 07:31 AM:

This repack has nice quality. Not the best I've seen, but watchable. However, the reason this release sucks BALLS is because it is a WORKPRINT. This should be NUKED for mislabel; FTF still doesn't know how to label? Anyway, I suggest you wait for a better release if you haven't watched this already. (This release has a different ending than the OFFICIAL release in theatres, so it's worth waiting for an OFFICIAL release)


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.