VCDQuality Forums - Signs *READ NFO* - TELESYNC

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 50 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Signs *READ NFO* - TELESYNC - VCDistro (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4965)

Posted by Beelzeebub on 07-17-2002 09:44 PM:

The dupers are coming now

Here they come your going to get a shitload of silver dupe rls The lamers at eDonkey will be proud

Posted by ensain on 07-17-2002 09:50 PM:

LMAO @ #VCDistro

Probably a better chan if no members of VCDistro are in there. Still upset because a news site didn't suck your dick over your first shitty release? Damn kids.

Even admitting in your NFO that this release is pretty shitty, and you still put it out, even tho the TWCiSO is pretty decent and came out 2 days before you. You should kick your market boy silver trader in the ass, or maybe stop buying from cdrom-guide (laaaame!) (re: the UTi Road to Pertinance NFO)

I voted x/x/x . Why vote for shit you don't even wanna acknowledge ? I'd rather not vote than than give them 1's and have to admit to watching it.

Posted by stastuffis on 07-17-2002 09:53 PM:

Dude, who cares? Just give your rating and get on with it. Is there anything better to do than flame? Once you start releasing movies equal or better quality then maybe you can start talking but until then be quiet because I hate having to read things of people bitching.

Posted by mymusic on 07-17-2002 09:59 PM:

anyone know what lens of glasses you sould wear to correct the blurryness?

Posted by Storm180 on 07-17-2002 10:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ensain
LMAO @ #VCDistro

Probably a better chan if no members of VCDistro are in there. Still upset because a news site didn't suck your dick over your first shitty release? Damn kids.

Even admitting in your NFO that this release is pretty shitty, and you still put it out, even tho the TWCiSO is pretty decent and came out 2 days before you. You should kick your market boy silver trader in the ass, or maybe stop buying from cdrom-guide (laaaame!) (re: the UTi Road to Pertinance NFO)

I voted x/x/x . Why vote for shit you don't even wanna acknowledge ? I'd rather not vote than than give them 1's and have to admit to watching it.

I dont think the quote was shitty. Source wasn't the best but watchable was the quote try reading.

And TWCiso was nuked for Mislabel and being a workprint, and not a telecine. Since telecine don't have watermarks. When it actially was a TS. It was also nuked for black bars. Should I go on? Ours is a TS and not a workprint. So no one beat us at anything. Also if you read the nfo of TWCiso you will see it says why they converted it to SVCD because the source was blurry and blocky. How come you not raping them for being honest?? All we wrote was Source wasnt the best but watchable doesnt mean its admitting shitty quality. So go suck a dick, it seems thats what your good at.

VCDQUALITY nice job on fucking up the jpgs..That wasnt even from our sample assholes..Why don't you post the pictures unedited from our real sample.

Storm180

Posted by ebeats on 07-17-2002 10:11 PM:

OK I have watched the entire TWCiso SVCD encode of this flick, and I must say-- despite the "black bars"(goes away after 2mins unless you have ADHD) and the red line running through the screen, it was one of the best pre-releases I have ever seen.

The sample of this rip here does not look even close to the quality of twciso's. Stick with the svcd encode until a Higher quality version is out. Why put out another unless it has atleast 2 quality ratings above the previous version.

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net

Posted by ebeats on 07-17-2002 10:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Storm180

I dont think the quote was shitty. Source wasn't the best but watchable was the quote try reading.

And TWCiso was nuked for Mislabel and being a workprint, and not a telecine. Since telecine don't have watermarks. When it actially was a TS. It was also nuked for black bars. Should I go on? Ours is a TS and not a workprint. So no one beat us at anything. Also if you read the nfo of TWCiso you will see it says why they converted it to SVCD because the source was blurry and blocky. How come you not raping them for being honest?? All we wrote was Source wasnt the best but watchable doesnt mean its admitting shitty quality. So go suck a dick, it seems thats what your good at.

VCDQUALITY nice job on fucking up the jpgs..That wasnt even from our sample assholes..Why don't you post the pictures unedited from our real sample.

Storm180

so much anger, over stupidity. trying to talk shit to justify yourself only makes you look more idiotic

I still think twciso kick yo ass

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net

Posted by Storm180 on 07-17-2002 10:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ebeats

so much anger, over stupidity. trying to talk shit to justify yourself only makes you look more idiotic

I still think twciso kick yo ass

Anger over stupidity? #1) VCDQUALITY edited the jpgs to blur them out and #2) they didn't even use the released sample..How fucked up is that? We have no right to be pissed? I think anyone in the position would look the same. BTW TWCiso I thought was good quality but it was nuked all over the place for at least 4 differnt reasons.

Bottom line is look at our sample...Do you see any of those scenes thats shown on vcdquality? I think not. End of story.

Storm180

Posted by RedDwarf on 07-17-2002 10:45 PM:

Hey Storm, why are you claiming to be a member the group now when you weren't a member in your "Reign of Fire" thread posts?

Posted by napalmfuzz on 07-17-2002 10:51 PM:

i could see getting all worked up if you actually worked hard on camming this release.. but its a fucking silver.. all you had to do is repack it.. a monkey can do that.. not once have a seen a good vcdistro release but anyone in their right mind will pick the svcd over this

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Posted by crysis on 07-17-2002 10:56 PM:

a backward step downloading this release.. get the svcd much better even if it was mislabeled.

Posted by ensain on 07-17-2002 11:03 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by VCDistro Lamer #1
Dude, who cares? Just give your rating and get on with it. Is there anything better to do than flame? Once you start releasing movies equal or better quality then maybe you can start talking but until then be quiet because I hate having to read things of people bitching.

VB fucked up and deleted the post i left previously, which is annoying. But hell, you're worth it.

One - "Dude who cares?" Maybe someone who doesn't suck up to every single release that comes out, especially from a group with a shitty attitude. You're not the only user here.

Two - Flame ? That wasn't a flame my son. I feel pity for you if you call a slight bit of criticism a personal attack.

Three - The day lamers like you catch me releasing anything is the day i retire. Just cos some people are stupid enough to boast about being in a group on a board or on IRC, others aren't. So you'll never know what I do , if indeed I do anything.

Four - "Be quiet"? No thanks. I have an account here just like you. I have as much equal right to say what i want as you do. Hell i even admitted i didn't vote or watch the film, but I believe I still believe I have the right to an opinion, especially when people like you post. You hate reading people bitching? I dont remember holding a gun to your head. Dont like it ? Dont read it.

quote:
Originally posted by VCDistro Loserboy #2
VCDQUALITY nice job on fucking up the jpgs..That wasnt even from our sample assholes..Why don't you post the pictures unedited from our real sample.

Can't be bothered to quote all your drivel, just a small segment, which I'll get to in a minute. Personally, I'd rather a nice, hard to get (usually) workprint of a Movie , due to the differences between it and the final print. I dont see you obtaining workprints (whether Reels or VHS) , all I see are crappy pre's that any established group would be too embarrassed to put out. You think you're the only people who can get these ? You're kidding yourselves, its just other groups have something called quality control, and its pathetic watching all these new groups fight over crap VCDs you bought off a market store.

Now, vcdquality. What do they owe you? I believe you slagged them in your nfo's, your members come into the channel just to act like assholes and cause trouble, and generally annoy all the users of both the channel and this board. So why should they take the time to download your sample, run over it by hand with capture software, choose the best representation, combine them, export and upload. That takes time you know. Probably longer than it does for you to pre on your columbian 10mbit site. When you treat other people with respect, maybe they'll be nicer to you? The staff of vcdquality have been around doing this before brats like you were out of nappies. And judging from the way you're behaving, it wasn't long ago. Instead of petit demands for them to do your jpegs with care and effort, how bout you apologise for acting like pricks, or just ask for the releases not to be added here. Believe me, vcdquality does more for your group than your group does for vcdquality, so how about you grow up a bit. This scene has been going for 15 years and longer now, and a lot of the forefathers are still around in some form or other. Groups like yours are an embarrassment. You're petit, you start fights with people who are doing you a favor, and your attitude is disgusting. Bit strange how your group has so much hate for this site, yet your members spend so much time posting? In fact, theres as many posts from VCDistro members in this thread than there are non-members.

You obviously have no respect for this site, the people who run it , or the users who comment on it. Theres other pre newsites on the net, why dont you go away and annoy them instead eh? Oh by the way, "So go suck a dick, it seems thats what your good at" ? great flame. You better go talk to VCDistro lamer #1, he might get offended by your negativity, and cause another strop.

But hell, if we're gonna get personal, in those glorious words, handed down from generation to generation of Bulletin Board flamers : "Fuck off and die of aids". Thank you.

Posted by Nasstor on 07-17-2002 11:05 PM:

LMAO @ vcdquality!

I looked at the sample and it seems that vcdquality have posted pics from a totally different sample.. hehe, what a jerkoff would do that? Maybe to make vcddistro look bad?

Well, the sample itself... not too good quality... but since it is a pre I'll watch anyway

Posted by b0nk3r on 07-17-2002 11:23 PM:

i still think twc blew all ur asses vcdistro. they had a 100x better release than you guys did. who cares if it got nuked for mislabel? it was still the best!!! and HAHAHA to your ub3r blury release :P

__________________
..

Posted by Vamp|re on 07-17-2002 11:23 PM:

Too blurry tcw was way better i doubt any other release will look even half as good as the first one did Telecine workprints who cares its watchable and being nuked be cause of two little black bars? wtf? are you watching this on a 2 inch black and white tv sets? Better luck next time

Posted by stumpy_006 on 07-17-2002 11:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by SilentKilla
Early.... But Next Time REmove The Beer Goggles From Infront of The Camera

lmfaooo thats great

its true this rls has a weird blur to it .. sound isnt great either .. i found it chop out abit in some places ..

i vote 3/4

__________________
stumpy_006

Posted by PizzaTheHut on 07-17-2002 11:27 PM:

well i checked out the sample and the truth is it ain't that bad. and no it does not look like the sample jpegs but it is alittle blury. only reson for picking this up is to see any scenes that are not in the workprint. I'm preaty sure that the workprint is missing stuff but not 100% on that. seemed to jump a few times (ex when they where chaseing the guy on the roof) maybe i'm wrong but i felt like it jumped to the next scene sort of weird like as if the one scene wasen't over.

Posted by PenisXX on 07-17-2002 11:34 PM:

LOL, they should have rlsed it as .asf ...quality would be the same hahahaha

Posted by Beelzeebub on 07-17-2002 11:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Storm180

Anger over stupidity? #1) VCDQUALITY edited the jpgs to blur them out and #2) they didn't even use the released sample..How fucked up is that? We have no right to be pissed? I think anyone in the position would look the same. BTW TWCiso I thought was good quality but it was nuked all over the place for at least 4 differnt reasons.

Bottom line is look at our sample...Do you see any of those scenes thats shown on vcdquality? I think not. End of story.

Storm180

Storm18o stfu you lamers on your sharereactor forum are the same way say anything negative about your silver dupe releases and you edit or ban the member so quit your fucking whining.
btw i heard FTF is trying to hire your poor maylay kid away from you lol.

Posted by Sig-Bro on 07-17-2002 11:47 PM:

Bwahahahaha! This Is too funny! Poor VCDistro, can't accept the fact it's a shit poor release. The TWCiso rls is the best so far i would say. It may be missing some music but that's better than watching a movie that should probably just be passed for the blind...coughcoughvcdistrocoughcough...I've had better looking shits this week than this piece of rubbish. At least they pre-d it, thats about the only props I can give them. Until then go and buy some better silvers.

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 50 posts from this thread on one page