VCDQuality Forums
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- After The Sunset - CAM - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=50486)


Posted by bcool2k on 11-12-2004 04:10 AM:

NUKED on my sites just for poor quality. NOT an official NUKE yet we will see..

NUKED:

camera.keeps.dropping.out.of.frame.unwatchable.at.points.


Sounds like a decent film. POT seems to be getting sloppier. began with the Incredibles. We know u can do better and of course this is just my opinion. Take or leave it ..I DONT CARE


Posted by rickhype on 11-12-2004 04:58 AM:

from sample

pic seems blurry audio is hollow and you can hear some laughter
seems like a good movie since i love Salma Hayek.
Glad pot's still releasing almost every movie and I usually watch most of their releases,
but this doesn't seem up to there standards. imo

4.5/4/x


Posted by Ruck0ver on 11-12-2004 05:21 AM:

5/6/x

Pic is a little blurry but i think it's watchable and the sound may be a little tinny but hell it's a cam and the sound really isnt bad.


Posted by wickedbull on 11-12-2004 05:33 AM:

video-5-very blurry
audio-5-little hiss, can't really understand anyone that well


Posted by Blue Angel on 11-12-2004 07:37 AM:

this was blurry but watchable, ty POT, you are trying and thats what counts 6/6/8


Posted by Neversoft on 11-12-2004 01:38 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING

2 DO NOT DISCUSS SOURCES FOR MOVIES

3 NO FLAMING

4 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE, NOT WHAT OTHER GROUPS MAY OR MAY NOT RELEASE

5 ONLY COMMENT IF YOU HAVE SEEN THIS RELEASE OR A SAMPLE OF IT

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE ABOVE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by diekund on 11-12-2004 02:34 PM:

ok the pic is very dark, grainy and theres big bits of the pic missing, maybe sitting too close to the screen. the cam moves about a lot, but hey, its still a watchable rls

the audio is very hollow sounding but still understandable

movie looks like it could be good

5/5/?


Posted by President on 11-12-2004 04:03 PM:

POT finishes first again, but they tripped and stumbled along the way, judging by the somewhat shaky camera-work in places

It's great that they get their releases out as quicky as this, but their latest batch have been a little disappointing by their own standards, but they deserve big respect for taking chances with sneaking in cameras these days.

The picture is wobbly in places, generally quite dark and blurry. The sound is tinny and has audience noise in a few places.

Pretty good movie, though.


Posted by Da Postman on 11-13-2004 05:42 AM:

Downloaded the first CD, I think the sound is pretty decent for a POT cam. It isn't as hollow or tin sounding as many cams. It almost fooled me into not being a cam, then I looked at the picture...when threre is a close up, it's not to bad, at a distant shot. I felt it was blurry and not up to POT's standard. They really raised the bar for themselve when they released "Ray." Since then, they've fallen from their establised standard. I don't know why, just as I thought they would take over the scene in TS's. For the the CAM of the movie, thanks for being 1st and there has been many times, POT is the only release.

V-5
A-6
M-6


Posted by Dodgy Del on 11-13-2004 11:20 AM:

AVOID this one

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).


Posted by MTV on 11-13-2004 08:48 PM:

fast,but video lets it down.audio not that bad.but t/s out now so who cares. ; )

4 / 6 / ?


Posted by darknez on 11-13-2004 09:22 PM:

not worth getting

3/5/7 shite


Posted by kenboon on 11-13-2004 09:29 PM:

id stay away from this 1 not a typical pot cam......
well worth gettin silvers TS rip nice pik + sound on that release

3 Video
4 sound
*movie


Posted by vip3r on 11-13-2004 10:39 PM:

Just a so-so release, looks like it was filmed through a "fogged up piece of glass" ... guess that's the best way i can explain it. Audio isn't too bad .. movie looks good. Thanks POT

4/5/?


Posted by jarksin on 11-16-2004 12:38 AM:

Well towards ending it skips scene where he needs to get back in time before they notice he is gone and it cuts off like a cliffhanger then resumes after there back and he made it waste of bw movie owns through


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 AM.
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.