VCDQuality Forums - Blade Trinity *SVCD* *INTERNAL* - TELESYNC

Show all 19 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Blade Trinity *SVCD* *INTERNAL* - TELESYNC - STN (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=51279)

Posted by keam on 12-11-2004 03:42 PM:

ok i guess........

6/7/8

Posted by Neversoft on 12-11-2004 04:07 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE, NOT WHAT OTHER GROUPS MAY OR MAY NOT RELEASE

6 ONLY COMMENT IF YOU HAVE SEEN THIS RELEASE OR A SAMPLE OF IT

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE ABOVE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Posted by CARLlTOS on 12-11-2004 04:49 PM:

Its watchable

video 6
sound 7
movie ?

--------------------------------------------------------

click here if u want to get paid for just reading emails!

Posted by rivaldo on 12-11-2004 04:56 PM:

havent seen yet but is it better then pots???

Posted by jmur on 12-11-2004 05:08 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rivaldo
havent seen yet but is it better then pots???

how about you get the sample and then post here instead of posting garbage only to be flamed in the future..

needed? no. but its internal so that makes up for it..i guess. the POT version was more than fine. i watch the whole thing. the only way that this will be better if it doesnt have, as another user said the "twat factor". lol. if you have pots release keep it, if not either this release or the pot release will be fine. i dont really see a huge difference between the 2.

Posted by makeme on 12-11-2004 05:35 PM:

Slightly worse then PoTs

Posted by jingles on 12-11-2004 06:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by makeme
Slightly worse then PoTs

Wow, Bravo, there's a statement and a half.

STN's release wasn't really necessary at all, POT's sharp cam really was decent apart from Bob turning up at regular intervals - Just to make sure this wasn't 'an added effect' to the film i went to see it at the cinema.

Cam was ok, had a slight hiss on the audio though through CD2 - Was this just me?

Overall 6/8/9

__________________
J I N G L E S They Call Me - Nothing More, Nothing Else

Posted by Dodgy Del on 12-11-2004 06:24 PM:

i was always under the impression that svcd was better quality. this release isn't as good as POTS so why bother!!

prob best to check quality first before labeling it.

stick to POTS release

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).

Posted by alanje on 12-11-2004 06:51 PM:

pots release is excellent well worth it if i havent seen this 1 yet but im happy with the pot release dam good if u ask em for a vcd the sound is excellent

Posted by crapper on 12-11-2004 08:48 PM:

well

not needed..

picture 6
sound 7
movie donno

get pots
i actually never thought i'd say:: GET POT"S
but pots better

Posted by 99Vert on 12-11-2004 10:16 PM:

POTs release is better.

SVCD Rating:

5/6

Posted by oqwarrior on 12-11-2004 10:27 PM:

This isn't a nad release, although if you can get POT's release instead, I'd advise that. The pic on this release seems a bit blurry to me (maybe I just need glasses 0_o). Movie was pretty good; saw it in the theater last night. A LOT of action, but not too much plot development.

6/7/7.5

Posted by .Th3 on 12-11-2004 10:43 PM:

Don't start on " this is not needed ", indeed it's not, that' why it's labelled as internal. Well.. The quality is not too good.

SVCD should be a mark of quality and well, this TS is worse-quality than the VCD Pot's one..

6/7/1, goddamn, I hate those movies.

Posted by bcool2k on 12-12-2004 02:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by .Th3
Don't start on " this is not needed ", indeed it's not, that' why it's labelled as internal. Well.. The quality is not too good.

SVCD should be a mark of quality and well, this TS is worse-quality than the VCD Pot's one..

6/7/1, goddamn, I hate those movies.

I couldnt agree more, NECESSARY, or NOT atleast so far its NOT a stolen source...a valiant effort, but POT was much better, cept for the head in the corner bit...Still waiting for a nice PROPER SVCD TS..Atleast they labeled it INTERNAL for once

Posted by JuJuJigga on 12-13-2004 01:51 AM:

This wasnt necessary and yes the title SVCD should be better, STN always comes out 2nd with a release slaps SVCD and people think it will be better.... When I see STN come out with a release I know Im not even gonna bother to download "only the sample" . STN should be ashamed to release this with the title *SVCD*. You have to do better STN if your going to have it be a SVCD!

3/5/6

P.S VideoCD/maVen/Centropy WHERE ARE YOU

Posted by jmur on 12-14-2004 12:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by .Th3
Don't start on " this is not needed ", indeed it's not

so after you bitch and complain about people saying its not needed, you go and say it yourself. stfu asshole.

Posted by .Th3 on 12-15-2004 03:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jmur
so after you bitch and complain about people saying its not needed, you go and say it yourself. stfu asshole.

What the hell have you understood ? Read and think about it retard.. I wanted people to stop saying it was not needed, not because it was or was not, but because there was no point saying it.

Understood "stfu asshole" leet ?

Posted by ki46ej03 on 12-16-2004 01:09 AM:

did not understand this film it goes nowhere

Posted by supastud on 12-16-2004 08:59 PM:

RETARD

LMAO!!!
Who gives a fuck eh? lol
It is not up to POT standard but does not have the bobbing heads or wavey lines!
take ya pick 6/6/10
StUdLy

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Show all 19 posts from this thread on one page