VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Aviator - TELESYNC - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=51971)


Posted by generalss on 12-27-2004 05:22 AM:

lookign good pot.....
based on sample... a bit dark in places... color are almost right on.... a/r looks funny at times.. but nothing major.

7.5/8/? I hear it is a pretty decent movie...

This is better than cam for sure....


Posted by vip3r on 12-27-2004 07:06 AM:

Eh, the picture on this is HORRIBLE. Fullscreen, EXTREMELY blurry/fuzzy, slightly angled, dark coloring, and well from the looks of it...probably 25%-75% of the fucking screen is missing .. looks like someone was filming it in front row, or zoomed in on the screen..Sound is good though...but this is a movie where you actually want to be able to see the entire movie and understand it .. so, if i were you, i would get the cam over this...better - fuller picture, and the sound is just fine on it. The way this release is..it didn't need to be put out, but, thanks for the effort POT. Don't worry, we still love you!

5/7/8.5


Posted by Frosty110 on 12-27-2004 07:10 AM:

the i assume white plane in the sample looks blue and its blurry and nasty. cam looked better? probably. sound is better though. bad bad picture. 4/8/?


Posted by Lab on 12-27-2004 07:16 AM:

Maybe FRA or MillerTIME can steal the audio and the video and we'll get something nice


Posted by Dodgy Del on 12-27-2004 12:13 PM:

Exclamation

not their best but who cares .......its christmas!!

sound is better than the picture but still watchable if you can't wait.

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).


Posted by XAVeRY on 12-27-2004 12:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lab
Maybe FRA or MillerTIME can steal the audio and the video and we'll get something nice

true

this is definetely not POT's best, but it's not the worst TS ever (which was "Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban" by TUN)
thanks for the sound, i'm sure that FRA or MillerTIME will do something nice with it, LOL!

4/8

__________________
()h |\/|y 60d! 7h3y'v3 |-|4x0r3d 4nd Phr34k3d |\/|y (0mpu73r!


Posted by Da Postman on 12-27-2004 01:21 PM:

I thought the sample looked pretty good, I couldn't tell if the video is really cropped liked mentioned above. So I've downloaded it and looked forward to watching it. Well, the A-Hole who posted the POT version, decided to not include and parity files and posted an incomplete version. I will now have to wait or not get to compare. I love those types of posters, their such wonderful people. So, from the sample, since this person doesn't want some of us to see POTs version...the video seems to have nice and clear colors, and the sound is right on.

V-7
A-8
M-? not enought to tell, thank you assclown poster.


[EDIT:: You're the leech, who are you to complain?... Sheeesh - Neversoft]


Posted by Darkness on 12-27-2004 04:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Neversoft

[EDIT:: You're the leech, who are you to complain?... Sheeesh - Neversoft]



Oh and I bet you just love getting incomplete downloads huh ?

What a stupid edit..

Anyway..

7/9/? only half way through.. looong movie


Posted by exorcist on 12-27-2004 07:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by XAVeRY
true

this is definetely not POT's best, but it's not the worst TS ever (which was "Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban" by TUN)

4/8



I guess you forgot about : The Two Towers release by NEWFXP. There is absolutely no release that could be worse than that.

Anyway, the video on this isn't THAT bad. When your face isn't planted against a computer screen it's quite watchable. Audio is superb.

__________________

Loving God.... Vengeful God...


Posted by J Fresh on 12-27-2004 07:52 PM:

decent qual...audio is nice.

is there gonna be a repack or am i the only one with rar problems....

CD1 - rar 21 bad?
CD2 - rar 04 bad?

__________________


Posted by keam on 12-27-2004 08:10 PM:

good job 7/8/7


Posted by sheki on 12-27-2004 09:59 PM:



7/8/7


Posted by EViL-EWoK on 12-27-2004 10:21 PM:

too many newbs post here.

6/7/?

__________________
I Just Want to Be like Radiohead, And do something ingenious.


Posted by bcool2k on 12-27-2004 11:09 PM:

Ok so about the Movie. LOL.. anyways horrible cropped and fuzzy pic as stated . Sound is DTS . I will wait for a better release Cam pic with POT sound would be nicer!!


6/8/?


Posted by CARLlTOS on 12-27-2004 11:28 PM:

the video is not so good but POT is getting alot better, the sound is good though.

Video 6
Sound 8
Movie ?


-----------------------------

Click here if u want to get paid for just reading emails.


Posted by Debo on 12-28-2004 02:16 AM:

crappy pic
good sound
5/8

__________________


Posted by rockomania on 12-28-2004 04:40 AM:

Based on sample. Pot keeps improving but this is not there best work, but its definetly watchable. Thanks for staying in the game guys. Some of us actually aprreciate what you do. Now enough of my rant. The video could be better for sure, but like I stated, its watchable. The audio is spot on, and since I can not rate the movie on a sample I will edit later if i get the whole movie down the road. So as I see it:

Video:7
Audio:9
Movie:Will edit laterz

By the way lookin just at the scores in here and looking on the main page so far how does this rate : V:8 A:8.5 M:9
I am a newbie so please inform me if you can. Thanks

__________________
THE HAND SHOCKER....2 in the pink, one in the stink.


Posted by Ten98 on 12-28-2004 10:17 PM:

Angry crap quality

How this is rated 7.8 I have no idea. The jpegs are nice but when the film is in motion it looks shocking. There is a lot of wobble, cam is frequently out of focus, too much motion blur and the colours have been adjusted far too heavily (so that you can actually see what's happening through the murky mess).

poor.


Posted by 404notfound on 12-29-2004 12:24 PM:

It looks like since these have stopped being posted you've all reverted back to your previous ways. Soooooooooooo PAY ATTENTION!

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE, NOT WHAT OTHER GROUPS MAY OR MAY NOT RELEASE

6 ONLY COMMENT IF YOU HAVE SEEN THIS RELEASE OR A SAMPLE OF IT

7 DO NOT COMMENT ON ME POSTING THE RULES

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE ABOVE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

__________________


Posted by ComeT on 12-29-2004 07:04 PM:

Video... little cropped & a few "late comers ", overall not bad, still watchable, very long film though so perhaps a "very nice quality" would make it a good enjoyable watch.

Audio... No problem at all, although I did notice a few sync problems in parts of the film, nothing major though, for about 4-6mins, not constant, just for like a minute or two in certain parts.

Movie... It was OK.

Thanks P O T !


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.