VCDQuality Forums - The Aviator *PROPER* *SVCD* - DVD SCR

Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Aviator *PROPER* *SVCD* - DVD SCR - BiGSCREEN (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=53642)

Posted by LoNeR on 01-10-2005 06:11 AM:

The Aviator *PROPER* *SVCD* - DVD SCR - BiGSCREEN

quote:
From BiGSCREEN's .nfo

Well AURA beat us on the svcd , respect, but their release is for this kind of movie too big . Because its aint a Action Movie who would deserv more than 3cds on this run time.

This amazes me... the movie is 10mins shy of 3hrs. But since it isn't an 'Action' movie, it doesn't deserve the quality that AURA gave us?

::edit: Nuked for size appropriately::

__________________
"The beatings shall continue until morale improves!"

Posted by frak on 01-10-2005 08:56 AM:

I read that as..

'damn we got beat.. um here's our piss poor excuse for
releasing it anyhow...'

since when does the type of movie dictate what quality is
acceptable.. perhaps if you're 12..

i'll stick with the very nice 4 cd release, something warranted
for a 3 hour movie.

Posted by J Fresh on 01-10-2005 02:08 PM:

loving the qual, and i prefer 3cds to 4...besides, let's say it's a flat 3 hours, 1 hour on each disc is still superb quality (provided it's done right)

v-9
a-8
m-xx

__________________

Posted by mikethomey on 01-10-2005 03:56 PM:

quote:
This amazes me... the movie is 10mins shy of 3hrs. But since it isn't an 'Action' movie, it doesn't deserve the quality that AURA gave us?

the reason bigscreen did this was because this is a slow dramatic movie, if it was an action movie like lets say alexander....then it would need a higher bitrate other then 1900 because of the fight scenes(which you wouldnt want pixelated)

but since its a slow ass movie with shakey hands and barely any action at all it doesnt really need 2400bitrate because the movie will not lose much quality with 1900...i think thats what they mean anyway

Posted by sYph0n on 01-10-2005 04:03 PM:

still a stupid proper reason ^^

Posted by Hairyhamster on 01-10-2005 06:18 PM:

no need for the proper....
aura release is great... so what if its 4 discs..... gonna be authored and burnt to dvd right???

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.

Posted by Neversoft on 01-10-2005 07:15 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Hairyhamster
no need for the proper....
aura release is great... so what if its 4 discs..... gonna be authored and burnt to dvd right???

In that case, why not just download the DVD?... The.Aviator.WS.DVDSCR-Tsunami-Appeal

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.

Posted by bcool2k on 01-10-2005 09:44 PM:

NUKED and for good reason Unecessary PROPER of this fine film.

Posted by Miller on 01-10-2005 10:03 PM:

lame lame reason for proper, 4 CD's was alright, also BiGscreens release, had lower then standard bitrate. im amazed how much they get nuked.

anyway, its not bad, the other release was much nice in Vid quality, sound is fine , haven't watched the movie yet, will be doing that tonight!

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by BubbleBoy on 01-10-2005 11:58 PM:

I went for this one because not everyone has access to cable for the 4 cd version.
It's very nice and the movie was better than i thought it would be.

9/9/8

THANKS BIGSCREEN

Posted by Lab on 01-11-2005 12:26 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Miller
im amazed how much they get nuked.

Two nukes and your amazed ?? :yawn:

7/7/6

Just get the DVD-R and quit bitching

Posted by HcC on 01-11-2005 09:11 AM:

4cds? learn to encode

__________________
--==HcC==--

Posted by Extractor on 01-11-2005 09:14 AM:

This dvdscr has been released way too much now, I agree that the Tsunami divx crap needed to be propered but this is a useless rel.

Posted by 3FaCE on 01-12-2005 08:16 PM:

Doesn't a proper have to IMPROVE on another releases quality? This seems more like a downgrade to me...

Video-6
Audio-8
Movie-9

Posted by bratt31999 on 01-13-2005 04:56 AM:

I guess I'm confused??? I thought we were supposed to rate the release itself. Even if this was nuked and wasn’t necessary shouldn’t we still be rating on the quality instead of who did what first. Who cares anyway? As for the rating, IMO The video was very good and the audio was great. The movie itself was a little better than I thought it was going to be. At any rate in the end I guess everyone has their own opinion. By the way please remember this was free. If you don’t like the quality all you have to do is hit the "delete key" and get another version.

V/9 A/10 M/8.5

Posted by FastAssEG on 01-13-2005 09:56 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bratt31999
I guess I'm confused??? I thought we were supposed to rate the release itself. Even if this was nuked and wasn’t necessary shouldn’t we still be rating on the quality instead of who did what first. Who cares anyway? As for the rating, IMO The video was very good and the audio was great. The movie itself was a little better than I thought it was going to be. At any rate in the end I guess everyone has their own opinion. By the way please remember this was free. If you don’t like the quality all you have to do is hit the "delete key" and get another version.

Exactly what I was thinking. I converted this to DVD last night and I just finished watching it and the quality was excellent.

10/10/7

Posted by rotorman67 on 01-16-2005 05:40 AM:

A 4 CD release for a 2+50 hr movie is one too many. A 3 CD release was needed. Like someone else said, just 1 CD more and you could’ve had the DVD release – lol. (This movie isn’t - Lord of the Rings.) A lot of us don’t have surround sound either, so all the extra space required for the AC3 sound is just taking up room that could’ve been used by the video.

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:40 PM.

Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page