VCDQuality Forums
Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Mulholland Drive - DVD SCR - JAR (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=607)


Posted by cosmic on 02-12-2002 02:53 PM:

FRAME RATE...[ 30
AUDiO........[ 128bit mp3 ]
³±³ ViDEO........[ 1600 ]
³±³ RESOLUTiON...[ 576x304 ]


?????????

I see a wrong nfo or maybe some ppl who doesnt know what they type...


Posted by pHo on 02-12-2002 03:32 PM:

they were talking bout that on another "unnamed" forum

Looks more like DivX stats, i guess someone messed up. It happens.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by cosmic on 02-12-2002 03:44 PM:

yea nfo is wrong just checked the movie in my standalone player

its a NTSC source, 480x480 , 29,97 frames , with 224 Audio


Posted by brako on 02-12-2002 05:27 PM:

so why was the movie rated a 5.4?


Posted by Halfmoon2 on 02-13-2002 02:35 AM:


Bad nfo, decent rip.


Posted by PepperKorn on 02-14-2002 10:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by brako
so why was the movie rated a 5.4?


Idiots who haven't even watched the sample voting cause the like the release group.
As I have said before it is harder to fuck up these DVD screeners than make a good job of 'em. Nice vid top quality sound pity about the movie though......at least the chick likes it.


Posted by MovieGod on 02-19-2002 07:42 AM:

Talking WTg WDDDDDDD...

KEWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..





Posted by Bartolomy on 02-27-2002 09:36 AM:

Excellent flick and good quality too.........


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 AM.
Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.