VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- Meet The Fockers *NTSC* - DVDRIP - BHP (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=60727)

Covers are included, ooooooooooooooooooh!

And all the extras are there, aaaaaaaah!

Original version, extended version and all extras and a healthy bitrate, my ass or well done!

judging from sample looks nice. but it looks like dvdshrink work but im not a genious at this. probably cause of monitor. wait till i watch on tv. so far



good movie though

Volume Name MEET_THE_FOCKERS
Application id
Implementation id mkisofs
Recording Date/Time (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/27/2005 12:12:47

Not a one-click from the ID, nor the bitrate at 9352k. Usually get those off beat numbers from re-authorist to do-cce4u. So looks legit to me.

JoshNya

which program do you use to get those results (especially to show which program was used to encode)

video was a bit grainy imo
audio was good

DvdInfoPro V3.52

Great Program

is there really 2 versions of a 115 min movie with bitrate of 9352k on 1 dvd5?
others (ray, rotk) were separate disks for the EE.

Well, another movie I'm just going to rent and rip myself. Definitely a CCE job, but suffers too much from a skimpy bitrate. I watched it tonight and I was disappointed with the copy. Lots of artifacting (pretty much around every object in the film). Granted it's a comedy and you don't need much, this however, was too little IMO.

For those that enjoy extras, well, it's complete. So can't complain there.

7/10 Video - An average of 3200kbit/sec on a full 1.85:1 looked pretty bad. The 7/10 is actually generous. Granted, the retail could be flawed to hell for all I know. But this sure don't look too good. It's a 115 min movie, it does need a touch more of the disc than they provided IMO.

5/10 DVD-R - I personally don't like when video is sacraficed to this degree just for some extras that are hardly watched by people. But that's me versus the rest who like extras, so I'll leave it at that. IMO, if you watch the extras, you like the movie. If you like the movie, buy it.

Good work BHP on keeping both versions for all saying dvdshrink when has BHP ever used that crap go ask mptdvd if you want a shrink copy

Hopefully the awful bitrate is grounds for a group like Replica to do an internal proper. Rather have untouched video than any extras at all.

for the dumb

first the avg bitrate was bout 3900 , still sorta low.

for the people who thought it was a complete rls. if you actually download and view the dvdr. you will notice the extended film option just adds extended scenes to the already main movie. that means only one main movie set, and the extended scenes are just called upon during the film.

this is genius and dedidcation by the producers.

all deleted scenes kept...cool.

video = 8 looks as good as any rls from any grp out

audio = 8 why would dd5.1 english be rated any lower ?

movie = 6 ...its an ok film. not the best of sequels, but had some laughs.

quote:

---

Originally posted by commiewhore
for the dumb

first the avg bitrate was bout 3900 , still sorta low.

---

there is no 2.0 audio on dvd only 5.1

Could someone please tell me where are extended scene in extedned version in which minutes.

Because it says that extended and theatrical version is 01:55:10 long

have you seen any extended scenes?
i saw the movie yesterday and didnt note anything new

even if the bitrate is overkill. it still looks great on my tv. i rather keep this than what i would have done and dvdshrink it.

8/8/9

anybody see any difference with extended. i noitced the blue dog but nothing happens.

quote:

---

Originally posted by porco556
Well well, look who's back...

Mathematically (something you're obviously not good at), tell me how you get 3900kbit/sec.

Let's do the math, shall we, I'll include all the steps not to confuse you.

3,525,246,976 bytes for the VOBs (including video + 5.1DD audio + 2.0 DC)

Movie is 115 mins.

3,525,246,975bytes / (115min * 60sec/min) = 510,905bytes/sec

510,905bytes / 8bit/byte = 4,087,242 bits/sec

4,087,242bits/sec / 1024bit/kbit = 3991kbit/sec

So, that is bitrate with 2 audio streams. Subtract 448kbit/sec and 192kbit/sec, for the 5.1 and the 2.0 and you've got 3351kbit/sec for video. Since the actual video would be around 2.5% smaller (pre-authored DVD size vs. finished product), you get around 3267kbit/sec on the video (with all the subtitles also included, but I am not going to calculate all that into it as it's minute)

So, tell me, where did you get 3900? And also, who's the dumb one again?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by commiewhore
sigh, obviously you...cause unless you are in the grp or have the retail in your hand, you dont know shit bout it, now do you ? anyhow, this forrum is for voting not for flaming...but you knew that right ?


*also where is your calculation for the extras ? and how much they are downsampled ? if you dont have the retail, your assumption on the original dvd vob bitrate could be flawed...and notice i said, about 3900 ...cause im not a cop like you..heh...give more facts bout how grps do things, please, its funny, hope you voted .

---

im glad you thought you were the dumb.
glad when i said, bout, and still sorta low, you took that as an insult and not fact which is what you were stating...that the rls bitrate was low. <cough>complex<cough>

*edited flame...due to forrum rules.*


what's cento py ? that a new type of plant ?

my vote still stands even though people cry interlaced.

video = 8
audio = 8 ...really how could you vote lower ? doesnt make sense, in theory dts would be perfect.

movie = 6 again not the best sequel

all extras kept is good, good to see it this early, unlike some, id buy this cause i have the first one bought..some people do that.

this one ill leave in for quoters, "vote with your mind not with your dong"

quote:

---

Originally posted by commiewhore
im glad you thought you were the dumb.
glad when i said, bout, and still sorta low, you took that as an insult and not fact which is what you were stating...that the rls bitrate was low. <cough>complex<cough>

*edited flame...due to forrum rules.*


what's cento py ? that a new type of plant ?

my vote still stands even though people cry interlaced.

video = 8
audio = 8 ...really how could you vote lower ? doesnt make sense, in theory dts would be perfect.

movie = 6 again not the best sequel

all extras kept is good, good to see it this early, unlike some, id buy this cause i have the first one bought..some people do that.

this one ill leave in for quoters, "vote with your mind not with your dong"

---

again, im not a cop like you, but you will see a proper from your grp MP* ....

bh* release is 3480kbps avg, tdrs2002 standards state that it has to be above 3300 bitrate main movie for rls


so i guess we are both dumb.

lets sword fight to see who is closest to being right ?

also rls is not interlaced. dont let sheep fool you.

quote:

---

Originally posted by commiewhore
again, im not a cop like you, but you will see a proper from your grp MP* ....

bh* release is 3480kbps avg, tdrs2002 standards state that it has to be above 3300 bitrate main movie for rls


so i guess we are both dumb.

lets sword fight to see who is closest to being right ?

also rls is not interlaced. dont let sheep fool you.

---