VCDQuality Forums - The Aviator *NTSC* *PROPER* - DVDRIP

Show all 11 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- The Aviator *NTSC* *PROPER* - DVDRIP - BHP (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=62492)

Posted by porco556 on 05-10-2005 10:43 PM:

Oh no... I got the first bunch of RARs... The video is even worse Oh well, I guess that was to be expected. 170 mins at 3100kbit/sec from around 6000kbit/sec is a tough encode... At least it looks like a CCE encode.

Gonna just buy this one, it'll be worth it.

Video 6/10 - Eh... What can you do. The untouched didn't look too good and this is worse. But keep in mind, getting the untouched wasn't that much better, so I think this is the better of the 2 releases (untouched I was thinking like a 7 or 8 max).

DVD-R 10/10 - From what I saw so far, this is as good as you'll have on a single DVD-5.

I am surprised it took this long to get the movie out at all, coming on DVD May 24 and Blockbuster already has it for their staff for pre-viewing (not for customer rental).

::EDIT - I posted this quickly without getting the whole thing to try and tell people this release is probably the best of the two, and not that I wanted to be "first" to post::

Posted by JoshNya on 05-10-2005 11:34 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
I am surprised it took this long to get the movie out at all, coming on DVD May 24 and Blockbuster already has it for their staff for pre-viewing (not for customer rental).

Eh? Two weeks is usually the norm, and this is exactly 2 weeks.

I think this looks good (from sample). BHP gave like 4 reasons to proper MPT, which I think just because it's MPT it should be propered . LoL

But porco556's standards are above all. If the original gets a 7 and this gets a 6 (to him), that means on my standards if the original is a 10, then this is a 9.

(sounds about right)

my .02

Posted by graham23s on 05-10-2005 11:56 PM:

just watched parts of the whole 2 disc release definately in need of propering from the rars iv seen a little blur to be expected though like the previous guy said a hell of a lot of movie to fit on 1 DVDR, i can see this movie getting done a few more times aswell

v-7
a-10
m-defo not my type LOL

Graham

Posted by lorddusty on 05-11-2005 12:59 AM:

The nfo says it all, thank god some grps actually take the time to encode properlly.

9/9/8

Posted by porco556 on 05-11-2005 01:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by JoshNya
But porco556's standards are above all.

Yep, I am one picky bitch

If the MPT is 10 for untouched, then this should be a 8 around IMO.

Definitely the version to get, checked out more and I'm happy enough with this. MPT's heart was in the right place, but their knowledge/know how is still lacking.

But usually releases are around 1 month ahead aren't they? Either way, it's out now, so time to enjoy.

Posted by Big on 05-11-2005 04:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556 But usually releases are around 1 month ahead aren't they?

A month ahead of shelf date isn't too common, more about 2-3 weeks.

Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 05-12-2005 02:17 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
Oh no... I got the first bunch of RARs... The video is even worse Oh well, I guess that was to be expected. 170 mins at 3100kbit/sec from around 6000kbit/sec is a tough encode... At least it looks like a CCE encode.

Ya id have to agree with this. I burnt BHP's copy and watching it in the standalone its blurry & motionblurness on fast moving scenes ... on retail it shouldnt have this , TC mabey.

Expected as mentioned as they crammed a hella lot of movie onto 1 Disc.

This is the release to get though as MPTDVD's copy Disc 2 was screwed (no menu etc , listed in nfo).

Had MPTDVD properly encoded Disk2 or release a patch the other stuff BHP said about 1 Disc blah blah woulda been crap.

Anyway this is the release to get. If you dont like motionblurnes etc , either wait for DVD9 or rent it in 3 weeks and make your own 2 Disc.

6/9/3

Posted by stereo on 05-12-2005 04:55 PM:

is it just me, or is BHP's version interlaced as fuck?

/stereo

Posted by Redemption198 on 05-12-2005 08:22 PM:

Maybe its the film, as i have yet to see a good copy of this film, all DVD sourced versions have been pretty poor, and i dont think its any fault of the groups.

Id be interested to see what the PAL DVD looks like when its out.

7/9/?

Posted by JoshNya on 05-12-2005 08:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by stereo
is it just me, or is BHP's version interlaced as fuck?

Definatly you or the source you got it from, just watched it all. Looked ok to me.

Posted by ntscuser on 05-17-2005 10:31 PM:

I can't fault this release. Perhaps my player is more tolerant of downloads than some others but I was unable to detect any motion artefacts. Not that I was specially looking for them since this a drama and not an action movie. Sure, the color looks real peculiar but I assume that was part pf the period feel.

Excellent as BHP's efforts are anyone who is a fan of this movie should still buy the retail. If nothing else you get to hear Scorsese's commentary that way.

10/10/10

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 PM.

Show all 11 posts from this thread on one page