VCDQuality Forums
Show all 18 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Bad News Bears - TELESYNC - ANON (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=65332)


Posted by X69 on 08-06-2005 04:59 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by Scene Old Hea on 08-06-2005 06:19 PM:

Not a ts, its a cam, grainy , hollow sound , cropped to hell, and the movie rocks so dont bother till a good copy comes along. "this is the same copy released a while ago"

__________________
Enjoy what you have before you dont have anything..


Posted by Scene Old Hea on 08-06-2005 06:28 PM:

nuked not bin and cue in mpg format blah nice try fellas

__________________
Enjoy what you have before you dont have anything..


Posted by latinchulovip on 08-06-2005 07:06 PM:

From the sample.

Video:6
Audio:6
Movie:?

This is not a TS. This is a cam.


Posted by humane on 08-06-2005 07:27 PM:

lousy quality, better luck next time

3/5/?


Posted by snozzler29 on 08-06-2005 07:54 PM:

picture is garbage

pixilation and blury as hell

video 2

audio 5

movie - not gonna ruin it by watching this


Posted by fractious on 08-06-2005 08:18 PM:

saosin plz come back this looks like hell 3/4/?


Posted by zerobyte on 08-06-2005 09:55 PM:

I only watched the sample but the sound does sound direct probably just an fm source.After doing a frame by frame comparison of this rls and the hydro Im convinced that the same video source was used but not a re-encode of what hydro released.If this grp simply cleaned it up they did an amazing job.To the eye this rls appears to be nearly twice as sharp as the hydro.I dont know whats up with the whining, from sample it seems perfecty watchable.

quote:
saosin plz come back this looks like hell 3/4/?


I wish people would quit saying stupid sh*t like that.wah wah wah .Be greatfull for whats being released. and if you payed more attention you would already know the answer to your dumbass question.


Posted by immun3 on 08-06-2005 10:22 PM:

Not a bad effort overall....

From watching sample AND first 10 .rar's

Video - first off why is being voted a 2/3???? it is clearly better than that. Comparing this to the Hydro CAM this although being the same source is sharper - far from perfect, but an improvement none the less.
Is cropped a little at the sides, and a top/bottom crop is also present. Pixellation is pretty minimal, looks fairly sharp to me. Camera is steady as of yet, no movement at all.

Audio - in my opinion is a TS, not a single piece of outside noise was i able to hear suggesting a mislabled CAM. Hardly the greatest audio heard, but during this times with the lack of DTS will do for now. Is fairly hollow, audible none the less.

Movie - seemed pretty funny so far, hope it doesnt turn too cliched......

6/5/*


Posted by menta| on 08-06-2005 11:39 PM:

not a TS at all
bit blurry, and audio is the typical hollow CAM

props to all grps including ANON (no matter how crappy this rls is) for bringing the scene back up to speed

6/4/7 film is actually better than i thought it would be


Posted by MyNameIsAnaki on 08-07-2005 12:08 AM:

Nice release for a cam.
It must be extremly difficult to get direct audio these days, glad to see the groups working hard making it sound good.
(The lies however..)

Anyways heres my score:

Picture :: 6
Audio :: 6
Movie :: N/A

__________________
Coming soon....


Posted by PoE666 on 08-07-2005 12:10 AM:

Bad News Bears

meh it's free thats all I can say seen it in the theatre not bad movie for bieng a remake either


Posted by ou812 on 08-07-2005 01:26 AM:

Horrible motion blur though the whole thing.


Posted by khorporate on 08-07-2005 01:40 AM:

As someone else pointed out :

Nuked for stolen source, stolen ascii and not bin+cue


Posted by vegasguy on 08-07-2005 03:21 AM:

hey now,

pardon my post, wrong release.


Posted by mattmatt02 on 08-07-2005 12:15 PM:

hey, this aint too bad, considering what the other releases were like. i mean, as long as it isnt dark or too blurry im ok!

v 7 - bit pixely but very sharp nonetheless

a 7 - direct but from analog source

m ? - will watch after full dl

cheers guys

:edit: when checking full rls, the pic is verry smooth and clear, pixelation is minimal to none, graininess is smoothed out so it looks nice, motion blur isnt that bad at all really,

all in all its a high quality release! it also cuts off when it fades to black at the end and some woman stands up so its definately the end of the film


Posted by buttmonkey on 08-07-2005 05:56 PM:

This is very watchable, once you get past the motion blur. Watched it on 42in LCD Projection...motion blur is a little annoying at first but okay. Movie was funny although it seemed like it skipped around alot without alot of explanation. I never did quite understand why Buttermaker was coaching this team. It never did say (I don't think)!

Video 6

Audio 7

Movie 8


Posted by XxHyDrOxX on 08-07-2005 06:05 PM:

This release was unwatchable in my opinion. The picture quality isnt too bad, but the motion blur really made it unable to watch. Sound wasnt bad, could be better. Thanks for the release :-D

6/6/7


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:47 PM.
Show all 18 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.