VCDQuality Forums
Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Supercross - CAM - RIDERz (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=65732)


Posted by X69 on 08-20-2005 04:01 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by Madmax on 08-20-2005 04:11 PM:

Sample show's alot of red tint, sound is good for a cam slightly hollow, movie itself prob stinks....i give a week or 2 in the theaters
7/7/sucks

__________________
AOL member since 1998


Posted by Arsenal_2005 on 08-20-2005 04:31 PM:

From sample pic looks goos slight pixleation and blur but very watchable.

sound is good and clear with slight hollow.

V - 7.5
A - 7
M - (will rate later)


Posted by qwertyu2 on 08-20-2005 04:40 PM:

Now bad for a cam, quickly released.

6/6/2

Cam is centered, little red, hollow sounding. Nothing you arent usto in a cam, but better then average.


Continue the quick releases RIDERz


Posted by dank! on 08-20-2005 04:55 PM:

Not a bad cam, a tad blurry, over saturated, and too much red hue. The sound is decent for a cam, not too hollow.

6/6/??


Posted by giannisKM on 08-20-2005 08:15 PM:

Not bad fro a cam
7/7/1

BUT MOVIE SUCKS.


Posted by vipper1oo7 on 08-20-2005 09:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Madmax
Sample show's alot of red tint, sound is good for a cam slightly hollow, movie itself prob stinks....i give a week or 2 in the theaters
7/7/sucks


how u gona say movie prob stinks and then in on the bottom u put sucks even thoe u havent even watched it yet
7/7/6 good movie if u like moto x


Posted by TheScribe on 08-20-2005 10:51 PM:

6/5/1

Video is above average, and audio is hearable, but a bit hollow. Good release for one the day after the theatre release


Posted by Assman on 08-21-2005 07:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by vipper1oo7
how u gona say movie prob stinks and then in on the bottom u put sucks even thoe u havent even watched it yet
7/7/6 good movie if u like moto x



6/7/And it truly does suck.
Just because one likes motox doesn't in any way make this a good flick.
I like hot girls but Coyote Ugly still sucks also.

__________________
Arguing on the internet is retarded and fun!!!


Posted by bluegrass on 08-21-2005 07:23 AM:

pretty nice cam 6/6/5

__________________
green is good


Posted by farcus on 08-21-2005 12:50 PM:

one question, does it show cameron richardson naked?


Posted by buffy on 08-21-2005 02:53 PM:

7/7/-2

Well, the quality's great, but come on, this movie is pathetic!


Posted by mattmatt02 on 08-21-2005 09:58 PM:

the imdb link on this site is fucked btw so here is the correct one:

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0403016/

quality is very good

7/7/?

:edit: got the full rls and it isnt very good. its looks good from first few secs but this film has lots of fast action scenes and when it does, it pixelates like crazy!! it is obviously from the same cammer as 40 yo virgin as it has some missing scenes, occasional shaking, and cropped at the sides. it also does that 'auto-adjust' thing where it is too light on darker scenes and too dark on outdoor scenes, or vice-versa. it has the same slight flicker and same amount of blurriness. i got it coz my motocross-mad friend was dying to see it but i personally wont watch until a better rls.

ratings change

v 5.5 (wouldve been alright at svcd but the pixelation is very bad on action scenes)

a 7 (average cam)

m ? (waiting)


Posted by weedchemist on 08-22-2005 03:56 AM:

a bit red nothing that color adjustments cant take care of, its 1 cd, which shouldnt hurt any1s hardrive, it looks good killing the red tint, but i was 2 drunk to finish it, but i got over 1/2 through, so... glad the good encoding went to 40 years old and a virgin but for this i give a 6.5/7/??


Posted by MoViE JuNkY on 08-22-2005 04:17 PM:

Major props on the 1 CD... gotta love those



V: 7
A: 7
M: 6



Vid was descent for a cam


Audio is a little hollow but not too bad


And the movie as everyone here mentioned here inst that great but maybe for someone who is into these types..


Thanks for the release RYDERz


Posted by anonymous_user on 08-23-2005 11:58 PM:

supercross

There are small bits of scenes missing. I guess instead of having the video look bad with a cover-up, that they just edited the cover-ups out. Not bad though, nothing big missed. Not more than 5-10 sec missed each time. It does it three times. Other than that and a little bit of camera fuckery, this is a decent flick.

Video:5 (would've been higher if not for
the missing scenes)

Audio:6.5 (not bad for a cam)

Movie:1 (sucked worse than my
ex-girlfriend)

Ease of watching:8 (gotta love 1 cd
releases, but only on
substandard movies
such as this)


Posted by weedchemist on 08-24-2005 04:34 AM:

NOW THIS IS THE 80's REHASHED lmao Yes i watched this, and its not amazingly bad, more like one of those 80s movies that was based around a sport, i remember a biking movie in the 80s and a tennis movie that are comparable, but sports movie add a blossiming relationship, add a pinch of tragedy and greed coupled with fame, and finally redemption with a underlying moral point, and this is it lol but im not lying... the picture is ok 6.5 great for a cam compared to what they used to be, these new ones are so bomb... sound is 7ish not bad a bit hard to hear in some spots... and the movie... well as an 80s movie its about a 9, i saw much worse during my childhood, but with my tastes a 5 and 1/2 so... 6.5/7/9or5.5 (see above line )


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.
Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.