VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 21 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Red Eye *SVCD* - TELESYNC - NBP (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=65784)


Posted by X69 on 08-23-2005 11:17 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by qwertyu2 on 08-23-2005 11:59 PM:

stolen re-encode


Posted by skombolis on 08-24-2005 12:10 AM:

Red-Eye SVCD

Supposedly this version is nuked because it is just a stolen Hydro version that has been re-encoded. Too bad if it is true


Posted by Airhead on 08-24-2005 12:22 AM:

Stolen ? (refering to nuke) ... Last time i checked Silvers were a dime a dozen. In that Case how come maVen's "Dukes of Hazzard" wasnt nuked for stolen from BaPH (same silver) ! ;p

Same picture litterly as previous CAM copy ... unfortionatly NBP didnt attempt to clean the picture up, they added a diff crop/AR and called it a day. Dark around the edges , some wierd frame rate and flickering , bleeding colors but very watchable like the CAM was. Audio direct is very low and bass is very quiet , looks to be in sync.

Should have been VCD TS

6/7/?


Posted by zerobyte on 08-24-2005 01:07 AM:

POST REMOVED: Stick with reviewing the release or you will be fisted with a salted boxing glove


Posted by Air1 on 08-24-2005 04:19 AM:

maybe i am the only one here but earlier in the day right when it was rls'ed i checked the sample and despite a red flag immediate 'nuke' for a re-encode reason, i was arguing with my comrades that this TS has slightly better audio but still a little hollow and i truly, truly question the direct audio. i also argued that the actual picture in the cam was quite a bit better so it's kinda like a double-edged sword. but a) it wasn't like the sound in the cam was/is -that- bad PLUS b) it's 1-disc; half the bw.

of course i was just judging off sample of this "TS" rls b/c i didn't actually get it since i was satisfied with the cam after watching the sample for this rls.

the CAM:

v: 9 (for a 1-disc cam? anything less would be insane)
a: 7.5 (although not direct it's definately good and all but too many cam's have worse sound)
m: still haven't finished.

this TS rls:

v: 6.5 tops
a: 8.0
m: see above


Posted by Nelson9937955 on 08-24-2005 04:52 AM:

Picture is the exact same as the cam release and audio is 10 times better. This is definately the release to get. I could not watch the cam release because the audio was too bad and too much hiss I could care less about nukes. I get what looks and sounds the best. These groups are taking the time fix these releases up, more power too them


Posted by menta| on 08-24-2005 05:32 AM:

movie itself was a bit weak but well worth the leech
saw the cam on the tele and got this one to check out anything i may have missed the first go round
thanks NBP for the work
well worth the bw

07/08/06


Posted by TrueGstyle on 08-24-2005 07:48 AM:

Video quality is same as cam apart from diffrent AR, but that might just be me.
Audio is alot better than cam.

7/7/9

Excellent movie, love the way you think its gonna be a romantic film then bamn have that for a twist.

__________________
Flame me but dont blame me


Posted by Doomsdayer on 08-24-2005 08:03 AM:

even if they've used another source to make it... big deal, as long as they're making a better release and sharing it... thats all that should matter, right? I watched a bit of the cam version, but when this was up for grabs, i got it....
Video: 7
Audio: 7
Movie: 8 - I thought this movie was actually pretty good... good storyline and i'm sure they werent working with a big time budget, cuz I didnt even hear about the movie til a week ago.


Posted by Peoples-Agent on 08-24-2005 09:39 AM:

Nuke aside,

Video 6 - as far as SVCD is concerned, dark areas seem darker than previous encode of the same source.

Audio 7 - a bit clearer than the last release.

Movie 6 - Way too predictable for my liking. Not the movie I was expecting to see.

__________________
The Point Of Life Is Simply To Live!


Posted by trenty on 08-24-2005 12:40 PM:

basically the same. pretty stupid to re-encode a movie... ah well

v-8
a-8
m-7


Posted by mattmatt02 on 08-24-2005 03:56 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by qwertyu2
stolen re-encode


no no, its stolen, then re-encoded lol!

still nice though and audio seems better so ill get full rls when i have a chance

8/8/

:edit: got the hydro cam instead, the audio on that was pretty good and with the same pic as this, i realised i couldnt be arsed with the longer dl

:edit 2: i had a better idea for them. it shouldve been released as a vcd ts. why? this is re-encoded which means there will be a little quality loss. they shouldve done DIRECT STREAM COPY on the video for the other release as it was fine, and then made the audio the same size/bitrate as the last one, there fore making it a better release all round.picture wouldnt have lost quality from the recode, and the sound would also have been better. this would also have made it a very similar size to hydro's copy (small).

i dont get why they didnt do this in the first place! untouched video, better audio and same size as original cam! i thought of it and im just a teenager, they are scene guys who should know more lol!!

/me thinks im rite


Posted by Nodders on 08-24-2005 05:41 PM:

Stolen source, but i like the audio.
Movie was BORING!

Vid : DonĀ“t matter, THIEFS!
Audio: 7
Movie: 3 (Wes Craven CAN do better)


Posted by Bullet on 08-24-2005 06:45 PM:

Personally i dont care if it's stolen. If they can make something better from a previous rls;..then why not? We will get a better goodie

But imho this rls aint that good. Video and audio is to bad for this movie.

5/5/7

__________________


Posted by hairy_coo on 08-24-2005 08:43 PM:

I can't get the past the IRONY of the folks calling the grp " Thiefs".

What are we ffs ?

__________________
Hoarns and Grass etc


Posted by Doomsdayer on 08-25-2005 06:47 AM:

hahaha thats a great point! *but complaining is what people do best*


Posted by IPswich on 08-25-2005 10:29 AM:

meh, the video is honestly no better than the CAM....but the again the CAM wasnt bad, so id say this is worth the download, especially becuase the audio sounds pretty good. anyhow, so far, this is the best release imo

7/8/6 (movie was so friggin predictable...so i guess if ur slow this will be suspensful )


Posted by moe411 on 08-25-2005 05:32 PM:

Stolen source?
we don't give a f*ck
this is stolen property in the 1st place

v-7
a-7
m-8

worth the d/l


Posted by shlomie on 08-29-2005 02:37 PM:

10X

10X


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 21 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.