VCDQuality Forums - Red Eye *SVCD* - TELECINE

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Red Eye *SVCD* - TELECINE - NBP (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=65913)

Posted by X69 on 08-31-2005 09:46 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Posted by warhead1999 on 08-31-2005 09:48 PM:

judging from sample pic and sound look very nice !

Posted by Horton on 08-31-2005 09:51 PM:

Another mislabeled release.

Obvious telesync - in first rar of cd1 during dreamworks logo, cam gets adjusted and zooms in a tad.

since when did 'TCs' do this?

at least it looks good.

7/6/3

Posted by mattmatt02 on 08-31-2005 09:53 PM:

maybe asteriods will get the true source, like they did with valiant. nbp's copy of that was obviously a ts but asteriod's wasnt!

this aint bad tho

as a tc:

8.5/8.5

as a ts:

9.5-10/8.5 (how could a ts be as good as this? if they are ts's then i want more!)

quote:
Originally posted by Redemption1980 (below this post)
not as good as the TC's of old like I-Robot, Hitch, Hostage, Assault On Precinct 13, recently they're all a bit too blurry.

i agree. the old tcs were sooo good. the island however was excellent, but hitch had such clarity and detail on the video, hostage had bright, vivid colors and of course, they all had DTS! i miss dts..

Posted by madaxion on 08-31-2005 10:14 PM:

Nice russian sourced release.
Just watched entire of cd1 looks really nice, ok this is obviously filmed in a cinema but nbp titled it TC so as not to be dupenuked as they had already released the ts svcd version, maybe they should have propered themsleves. lol
Red Eye *SvCd* TS NBP Proper would have satifyed the sheep nukers and u ALL now who u are.
Now time to educate matmat02,

ok for most NBP releases Source is DVDR
dvcam
dvdr rls = ROYAL
svcd/vcd =NBP
Xvid = ASTEROIDS

Times are hard, new groups are coming through and the quailty is getting back to normal. Props to royal getting tuns source We need less nukes and i personally like the russain copies, that wotw was superb.

Posted by giannisKM on 08-31-2005 10:34 PM:

9/8/??

Posted by certified_mad on 08-31-2005 10:35 PM:

Good Quality really nice picture great sound just the quality I like good work NBP.

8/8/7

__________________
Shit Happens..............

Posted by Redemption1980 on 08-31-2005 10:43 PM:

NBP, Asteroids and Royal usually have the same source, cant confirm with Valiant as i never bothered with that, but every other TC recently has been.

I noticed the Adjustment myself, this can happen on a Telecine, not sure about the focus thing though, dont see how that is possible, but TBH im not totally sure myself, as this goes right all the way to the end, right up to the last Dreamworks Logo, i also couldnt find any Motion blur either, so not sure how they could of managed that on a TS.

Good release, not as good as the TC's of old like I-Robot, Hitch, Hostage, Assault On Precinct 13, recently they're all a bit too blurry.

As a TC

8/7/?

As a TS

9/7/?

Posted by imprezawrx on 08-31-2005 11:37 PM:

why has this been nuked? cos its mislabelled?

Posted by the-mustangman on 09-01-2005 12:25 AM:

why was it nuked?

Posted by sinbad091071 on 09-01-2005 12:52 AM:

If this is a telesync its one of the best I've seen

9/8/8

Posted by notgnihsaw420 on 09-01-2005 04:10 AM:

THIS IS NOT A TS!!!

WATCH THE WHOLE RELEASE BEFORE JUDGING FROM A RAR!!!

The TC machine wasnt in focus that is why the WHOLE pic is blurry not just a edge or the center of the recording...

Hands down one of the best

8 / 6 / 9

v - tad bit blurr, but the colors are on the ball... dark scenes are hard to see detail...

s - kinda sucks, sounds over amped and their is a large amount of hissing in the background... but atleast its not a cam...

awesome flick

HUGE PROPS!!!

::shouts to the A S T E R O I D S crew for their finest reinc to date, big things::

__________________
All my movies are burned using "PC Club" generic CD-R, and generic DVD-R disks. They are played on a AVAYON DXP1000 xvid/svcd/vcd/blah blah blah blah player...

Posted by alanisrox69 on 09-01-2005 04:12 AM:

Mislabled, but still a great release. Picture is a bit blurry and "flat", but color is great. Audio is decent, not DTS, but still decent. It's definately a TS though, not a TC, it's just filmed with an HD camera (3-CCD) so that's why it looks like a TC.

Overall,
Video: 8
Audio: 7.5
Movie: 6 (too predictable!)

-Derek-

Posted by dwayne on 09-01-2005 05:01 AM:

4UNNUKED: 07(rip.is.completey.fine).not.re-encoded.the.ripper.just.joined.2.groups.so.stop.being.a.w*****

__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world."
-Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

Posted by Airhead2 on 09-01-2005 05:33 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by madaxion
Now time to educate matmat02,
ok for most NBP releases Source is DVDR
Props to royal getting tuns source

NBP's source is XViD , when all these russian TELESYNC's pop on russian torrent their all in XViD format, all NBP does is take it , strip the russian audio and encode to SVCD/DVDR/XViD whutever.

Props to ROYAL for getting TUN's source ? .... wtf , ROYAL is TUN. All the same group , as you can tell in the past NBP was TUN's shit group. TUN thought they were gods cause they downloaded Russain TS's and labled them TC's , they were shit 1 year ago and everyone hated them , they didnt want that critisism again so NBP formed for the shite releases.

quote:
Originally posted by dwayne
4UNNUKED: 07(rip.is.completey.fine).not.re-encoded.the.ripper.just.joined.2.groups.so.stop.being.a.w*****

Shows the mentality of ******* , wtf kinda unuke is that , its a TELESYNC either way, no matter how much NBP crys. They should have labled it properly before they released.

As for this copy as mentioned its blurry , its dark "Story of NBP's life" , out of focus effect, Clearly not a TELECiNE but yet a TELESYNC , like all their rest. Audio same as their TS.

As a TC:
5/7/2 << ubber crap movie

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by betelgeus on Fantastic.Four.2005.SCREENER-TUBE
i know exactly what a screener is and have done for 20 years.

screener should be dvd quality with hallmarks and trust me on this

so ask next question!

Posted by lickmyzack on 09-01-2005 07:05 AM:

seems like a sheep nuke, looks like a cheaply done TC.. anyone can buy a cheap TC machine from Ebay....but definetly very nice release. Keep it up!!
Video is nice, Audio is nice, movie.. pretty good. Rachel McAdams is hot, and hell.. I didn't even know the old dude from "CHiPs" is still kicking..

9/8/8

LMZ

Posted by protekt0r on 09-01-2005 07:24 AM:

FARK... these telesyncs are getting so good it's tough to tell anymore. It looks like a bad TC to me. Anywho, 7 for picture... AR looks off to me. 7 for sound. I heard some hissing in the sample? Movie: ?

Best release yet and very watchable. Thx NBP.

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"

Posted by fractious on 09-01-2005 08:31 AM:

8/8/8

the one to to be getting imo

Posted by zerobyte on 09-01-2005 11:49 AM:

What are you talking about.TC Machine not in focus?Do you have any idea how that technology works!!!!This is a ts.no wat around it.If you actually take the time to understand how a tc machine transfers film frames to digital frames you would know theres no chance of the freakin thing going out of focus.Its a scanner.This has blurry spots, and you do see a zoom in the begining.Its a nicely done ts but hardly a tc."Anyone can buy a cheap tc machine off ebay" LOL - not the kind of tc that would be used to transfer this kind of film.Maybe your thinking of a telecine box which essentially is just a telesync but only used for 8mm, 16mm home video's. Not one of these groups have there own tc machine , especially not nbp. The cheapest your going to find one is 30 - 70k and that doesnt include, storage which is around a 100tb for a single movie. Anyway, im just trying to emphisize that not one tc you see that is released by any of these grp's was done by themselves so its easy to understand why there would be a lot of mislabled releases but if understand the technology and what a finished tc transfer is suppose to look like you would know that this is not one.

Posted by vipper1oo7 on 09-01-2005 01:09 PM:

saw this in the theater and that little zoom at the beging during the dreamworks logo is part of the movie it did the same thing at the cinema
as a tc
9/8/10 alwsome movie

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page