VCDQuality Forums
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Transporter 2 *PROPER* *SVCD* - TELECINE - NBP (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=66152)


Posted by X69 on 09-13-2005 08:08 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by UNIBOMBZ on 09-13-2005 08:10 PM:

Groups

i miss the TURE TeleCines !!!

:: TURE!


Posted by Airhead2 on 09-13-2005 08:18 PM:

I dunno if NBP are dumb or just stupid ... they seen SCOPE get flammed and nuked everywhere for mislabled TELESYNC , then they got the balls to lable it a TC also ... lol.

NBP got beat on their own source ! , gotta reencode those TELESYNC's from torrent faster next time.

For quality rating check SCOPE thread.

Way to bright , and super bad AR ... NBP's sample made me almost dizzy watchin it, looks like the DV Cam was on the roof facing down at the screen , lots of the screen cut off also. As for the CAM audio rumor .. sounds direct to me.

SCOPE is the one to get outta the two.


Posted by LaX on 09-13-2005 08:19 PM:

cam audio i heard NBP got nuked for cam audio.


Posted by matthewm on 09-13-2005 08:25 PM:

there isa post by sniper on a site that looks like a great tc..nothing like either of these posts


Posted by MoNoXiDe on 09-13-2005 10:28 PM:

7/7/? - As a TS!


Posted by napalmfuzz on 09-13-2005 11:06 PM:

why would someone waste time posting something here that they "heard"? pleaes dont bring hearsay to the comments forum

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"


Posted by Mr E on 09-13-2005 11:21 PM:

Well it isn't a great TC its an average TS. It is very bright, this can be seen in the JPG sample but even more so in the MPG sample!

Sound was ok from sample.

Well watchable but not a telecine.

__________________
"The lesson here is you can't expect users to learn. There's too much fun going on out there on the Internet."


Posted by hijglander on 09-14-2005 06:13 AM:

From Sample:
Not a Telecine, must be a telesync with poor lighting and bad AR....
Sound seems to be good.

6/7/-


Posted by THE_SAINT© on 09-14-2005 08:34 PM:

The.Transporter.2.PROPER.TC.SVCD-NBP

The.Transporter.2.PROPER.TC.SVCD-NBP after looking at film itself not dam samples as most of the people in here do , i think its a way better Q than scope the angle isnt bad and its engilsh writing in the transporter bit so not recode , anyway as a cam { 8 }
{ 8 }
and the film 5

8/8/5

like a say time and time again get a life and watch the film than put THE MARKS OUT 10 SHIT


Posted by Dwaggy on 09-14-2005 09:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by notgnihsaw420
Removed: lots of fucking dots



Yeah you're banned

__________________



i have sigs off


Posted by madnukey on 09-14-2005 09:35 PM:

Quality was excellent throughout. Have no idea why people are saying this is a TeleSync (Cam pic, direct audio).

Didn't notice much in the way of motion blur or graininess at any point in the movie. The AR seemed fine too. There is no "angle" at all.

8/7/7 (decent action flick, turn yer brain off & let it happen )

__________________
... nukey


Posted by zerobyte on 09-15-2005 02:48 AM:

People are saying that because among other things white light exposure like what we see in this release does not exist in a tc.only ts.


Posted by vifa84 on 09-15-2005 03:27 AM:

Good quality video and audio, my only small complaint would be a little over cropped at a 2.52 aspect. But otherwise great job! Movie was ok:

8/8/6


Posted by rockomania on 09-17-2005 10:14 PM:

Ok the quality on this was 7.5, a little dark for me, audio seemed a tad muffled so a 7.5 for that. Now the movie. WOW not the worst movie of the year, but easily biggest letdown. What a let down. I had high hopes after seeing the first one a couple of years back; it had really good action scenes in it. Did anyone here actually watch this w h o l e movie before rating. There so many "give me a F$#king break" scenes in this movie that it ruined it for me. Don't get me wrong, Jason Statham is a great actor and looks like he really knows how to do fighting scenes because this movie has a few good ones like the first movie did. But man oh man when he got in that car of his the movie went down the toilet. Scene after scene of hilarity insues. Be fore warned people. So, 7/7.5/4. Watch if only to laugh.

__________________
THE HAND SHOCKER....2 in the pink, one in the stink.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 AM.
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.