VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- War Of The Worlds *NTSC* - DVDRIP - Replica (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=67069)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

9 DOWNLOAD AT YOUR HEARTS CONTENT HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

fuckin awesome ... Replica always does it the right way....

Video- 9
Audio- 9
Movie- 8

Video 9, No pixelation
Audio 8
movie........
Thnx Replica

video-- 9
audio -- 6
movie -- 5

I wish they have kept the DC, maybe Steven Spielberg will be able to explained the many parts that didn't make sense

Movie deserves a 3 or lower. DC should just be spielberg apologising.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

You could try rating the release? Imdb.com is good for rating movies.

V = 8. Looks great, just something about it ... can't really explain what it is. Grainy maybe? I'm not sure, perhaps that's the way the actual film looks. I'm trying to compare this to the previous *PAL* release I got by SCREAM.

A = 9, sounds great to me. DC would of been nice but that shouldn't apply to the rating of sound quality.

M = 7.5 - Paid to see this in theatres with the wifey, it entertained me and that's all I'm asking for, from a movie like this. It was way better than some recent movies I paid to see (Ex. Doom)

does look a tad bit better than the PAL version.....

V: 8.5
A: 9
M: 5


Vission, pHo can do pretty much whatever he wants. He's a veteran and his opinion is more valuable than 99% of people on this forum.

__________________
Want to fight about it?

Well, this is a BIG improvement over the PAL encode. I've looked at some frames at 400% (to do a comprehensive test between the PAL and NTSC) and not only does the Replica version have much less artifacting and blocking, but also the colors are more natural.

Overall, my PAL copy is gone and this one took over. This is definitely the better of the 2 releases, not to mention it is R1, so it will most likely be the last also. But even for the UK crowd, this one does have better picture. But I think that is mostly due to the encode by Scream... This R1 is only a bit higher bitrate, but MUCH better quality.

quote:

---

Originally posted by vission
You could try rating the release? Imdb.com is good for rating movies.

---

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Yes there is some slight Pixeling about 8 min in watching the sheets on the clothesline but not really Replica's fault its a 2 hour movie with lots of action ..maybe a few more passes for all the action might of help .. other then that its mint like allways from Replica
9.5/10/8.5 kept me up in my seat

vid 9, aud 10, film 7.5

:: BANNED FOR FLAMING A FUCKING ADMIN

how is this compared to the JFKDVD rls? In teh JFKDVD nfo they say bitrate is higher than this one---

any tips appreciated.