VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- King Kong *SVCD* - TELECINE - NBP (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=67948)


Posted by X69 on 12-28-2005 11:31 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by vurtX on 12-28-2005 11:35 PM:

video =8 sweet as a nuns munchkin .. but subtitles cropped off at the bottom

audio = 8, tasty as a nuns buttline

movie = 9 as peachy as a nuns breast leverage! peter jackson is the bitch!


Posted by Mindlesss on 12-28-2005 11:37 PM:

Review

Heard this was nuked cause its a re-encode . But judging by sample it looks great . Lots of dust spotting tho . My sample dont have sound . Or im having sound problems on comp . Will report back after un rar in a minute .

From sample

Vid: 8
Sound: ?
Movie: 8 (Jack black suprized me )

Definatly have a new (as i didnt before) respect for Jack Black


Posted by cdx1 on 12-28-2005 11:48 PM:

you seem to have a thing for nuns lol, but i agree with your marks for this. its a very good RELEASE


video =8

audio = 8

movie = 9

__________________
cdx1


Posted by nakedeye on 12-29-2005 12:03 AM:

Is this copy dark? The last one you could hardly tell what was happpening in the dark scenes.


Posted by PhantomICEMAN on 12-29-2005 12:16 AM:

Is this release acropped as much as the Asteroid release also is the same quality or worse?


Posted by PlasmaWhore on 12-29-2005 12:18 AM:

Very Cropped on top and bottom.

6/7/?


Posted by jaxxboss on 12-29-2005 12:30 AM:

Ostensibly resplendent with a smattering of succinctness in the accuity of this movie. Oh it is kewl nizza too


Posted by sportsfan99 on 12-29-2005 12:39 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by jaxxboss
Ostensibly resplendent with a smattering of succinctness in the accuity of this movie. Oh it is kewl nizza too


WERD!


Posted by 115641 on 12-29-2005 01:06 AM:

Can anybody tell me if this one is better than the 'ASTEROID TC xvid'-release?


Posted by Iammyself on 12-29-2005 01:15 AM:

better detail than some of the other what? 4 releases? the problem comes with the crop to some...

seeing as I watched the hydro cam all the way through, this looks real nice... however a cam/ts has different standards than a TC, in my mind

A cam is allowed to not have the whole screen, now a TC... even to remove subs needs to stay the full picture.... ill crop them out if I choose not to have them (easier than fixing audio), they choose for me... the movie isnt that great, the sound is quite better than the cams... for a tc, you know its subbed (yet cropped out) due to the huge black bars to WS it....

thats my major problem... if it was something i needed to see again (but if i did i would wait for a DVD or good TC source after a 1st watch) this movie doesnt meet those standards...

some say the computer generated graphics is a reason to watch the movie in a theatre... I say its the story, and this story is overstretched and pretty stupid to recent generations... a few remakes have been ok... but using the same things again and again is played out.... too bad that will last for another year or more... oh well for this id say 7/8/5

::vid is great yet cropped a bit::
::audio is good, yet not the best::
::movie is old, footage stretched out and not really built upon::

to me this is jurassic park 2 with a strong ass monkey involved who happens to find a hot female that for some reason other than concious cares for him....

::yes i know this came way before JP2 originally, i just see so many connections (which jp2 damn well coulda took from the original KK) but they are too similar, besides the love story they are basically the same


Posted by Vocali on 12-29-2005 02:20 AM:

Much Better! thank you NBP!
from the looks of the sample video is amazing as well as audio... way over cropped though Cant wait to get ahold of this release

video:8 would have given 9 if not for terrible cropping
sound:9 sounds great
movie: havent seen it yet... will get this realse

__________________
Im a playa aint no doubt, Hoes wana know what im bout, biggest diamonds all in my mouth, princess cuts all in my chain, woodgrain all in my range, drippin stains when i swith lanes, whats the game its still the same, swisha house or swisha blast, michal watts he made me hot hard worked me to the top, he wrote a check and bought a drop, i got the internet goin nuts but T-faris got my back so now im holdin my nuts its Paul Wall baby what you know about me im only 5'9 south lee baby holla at me


Posted by MoNoXiDe on 12-29-2005 03:08 AM:

Not bad...


Video: 7(Cropped) But good overall.
Sound: 7 (Sound is good).
Movie: ??? (No Intrest)


Posted by SHaKiNGBRaVe on 12-29-2005 08:49 AM:

shame shame shame

you'd think a group would try and pass something like this off for a lesser release, but no, they go and do it for a huge blockbuster. have some pride in your work if nothing else!!!

video : 6, cropped to hell like all the other reencodes (xvid comes to mind). and if you think this is a real tc, i've got a news flash for you.

audio : 6, dunno if it has to be direct for a telecine per scene standards, but throw me a bone. non-direct audio doesn't surprise me considering their video source

movie : 6, didn't impress me (besides the cgi)

sorry for the harsh review, but certain groups that label ts's and audience audio as tc's and direct should just label properly. i'm not knocking the effort and risk they go to to provide these releases, JUST BE HONEST!!!

__________________
fus j00


Posted by frak on 12-29-2005 12:28 PM:

there is a hybrid xvid video - audio from who knows where floating about in dvd5 format. quality was suprisingly good, didn't see an official release for that version tho - would pass for a very good TS.


Posted by dragon25 on 12-29-2005 02:58 PM:

Anyone else just spot that VCDQ has just unnuked this


Posted by myndphuk on 12-29-2005 03:17 PM:

Yep


Posted by lilnickky6 on 12-29-2005 05:36 PM:

Cool

Yeah it is un-nuked! The sample looks good though, haven't gotten the whole thing yet. Will repost on quality when i do.
But judging from sample i rate it at 8.5/8.5/9


Posted by 31337 on 12-29-2005 05:53 PM:

I don't know if NBP is the same source or not, but here's how I rate the ASTEROiDS xvid rls I watched last night--

Video: 10 - Excellent. I've seen lesser quality DVDRips.

Audio: 10 - Loud and clear, but a tad boomy. Subtract 1pt if you don't have an EQ.

Movie: 9 - Lived up to the hype imo...


Posted by me-self on 12-29-2005 09:51 PM:

The xvid is worth the grab, i am getting the ROYAL dvdr, guna watch it on saturday, but 3h 30m long it abit much,

V:7(To cropped)
S:7(You can hear it gd enough, not the best )
F:?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:50 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.