VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Big Mommas House 2 - CAM - PRiDEVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=68461)


Posted by X69 on 01-29-2006 02:54 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by paradise_isla on 01-29-2006 03:12 AM:

based on the sample and skimming through the whole movie

7/7/?,but sure to be good

sound has a holoow sound and picture is a little dark and slighty blurry but a awsome release for the day after great job Pride.thank you for the great fast release


Posted by dronso on 01-29-2006 03:19 AM:

Not bad for first release picture is clear a bit jerky and sound is hollow but you can understand all in all not bad.

Cam
8/8/?


Posted by immun3 on 01-29-2006 03:45 AM:

Well its an improvement over recent attempt's from PRiDEVCD, but still a fair way off a good release.

From watching the sample and first few rar's

Video - the key words here are ZOOMED IN TOO MUCH. It's a serious amount of zoom, leading to a major crop on the top/bottom but particularly on the sides, which are missing almost all the initial intro sequence. Is tilted from left to right. Suffers from a fair amount of pixellation and seems to have some sort of weird "band" down the middle of the screen??? :// On the plus side colours aren't too bad from what is left of the picture, and if you want to see this film that bad, you could (in theory) watch this copy.....

Audio is on the hollow side, but just about audible......to be honest i need to watch more to really judge it, but im not willing to download anymore to check.

3.5/5/* Wait for better, is the best advice i can give.


Posted by Weed_SMoKER12 on 01-29-2006 03:50 AM:

judging from sample, video is ok for a cam, audio is a lil hollow, not bad for a 1st rls

V = 6
A = 5
M = ?


Posted by kevlar on 01-29-2006 04:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by immun3
Well its an improvement over recent attempt's from PRiDEVCD, but still a fair way off a good release.

From watching the sample and first few rar's

Video - the key words here are ZOOMED IN TOO MUCH. It's a serious amount of zoom, leading to a major crop on the top/bottom but particularly on the sides, which are missing almost all the initial intro sequence. Is tilted from left to right. Suffers from a fair amount of pixellation and seems to have some sort of weird "band" down the middle of the screen??? :// On the plus side colours aren't too bad from what is left of the picture, and if you want to see this film that bad, you could (in theory) watch this copy.....

Audio is on the hollow side, but just about audible......to be honest i need to watch more to really judge it, but im not willing to download anymore to check.

3.5/5/* Wait for better, is the best advice i can give.



well, its not like its a damn ts-svcd, its a damn cam...ok, now to rating this on a cam source...its ur typical silver..like one true thing said above, it is a lil over cropped, but oh well, its a quick rls on a decent movie

v-7(rem its a cam)
a-7(rem its a cam)
m-? have not watched it yet

this is all from watchin random rars and the sample


Posted by DEVON101 on 01-29-2006 04:21 AM:

Ok its not the greatest but its far from a 3 video wise. Yeah its cropped on the side but going through cd1 you don't even notice. You only notice during the opening credits. Audio is hollow but very audible. This is from watching on pc, on the tv may be a totally different story. 6.5/6/?.


Posted by EViL-EWoK on 01-29-2006 04:32 AM:

5/5/ its a sequal to a shitty movie

__________________
I Just Want to Be like Radiohead, And do something ingenious.


Posted by Tadge on 01-29-2006 05:00 AM:

Like the man says what can u expect from a cam 5 mins after box office rlse. Typical cam slant and cropping. Sound not too bad for cam.
Its as simple as..If ur into Cams grab it its watchable..If ur not into cams, its not good enough to change ur mind

Thx 4 the rlse guys

based on Cams

video 7
audio 6


Posted by Mr.Ucanstand on 01-29-2006 05:38 AM:

7/7/7

Great for a cam !!!!!

Martin is funny!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by PlanetSmasher on 01-29-2006 06:18 AM:

I'm sorry but personally this is a poor release the quality is not worth it, it's cropped zoomed and has a mad slant to it. The Audio is hollow, and for the most part not clear enough to understand what is going on.

As for those who kept saying Remember this is a CAM, that's right it is a cam, and being a cam has nothing to do with the POOR quality of the picture, the audio is excusable as it's a cam, but a cam is only a TS with indirect audio, which in my opinion means we should be able to see a nice clear picture with poor audio. I grabbed 5 rars of cd1 and 3 of cd2 plus sample, and personally this is not worth the download.

Props to the group for a very quick release, speed on release is excellent, but I think the quality suffered for it!!

__________________

Star Wars is The Movie to watch, EPIII The Birth Of The DEATHSTAR The Planetsmasher


Posted by torxxx on 01-29-2006 06:48 AM:

For a cam, its pretty damn good. I'm watching it right now. There is a slight hiss from the camera mic, the colors are off a lil bit. Adjust the color in your media player and play with the equalizer a bit and it plays just fine

V - 6
A - 6
M - ?

Thanks for the quick rls


Posted by nakid on 01-29-2006 08:16 AM:

Not bad for a cam. grainy and a bit of a hissing sound but overall not too bad

7 v
7 a
? = not my type of movie


Posted by dubplate on 01-29-2006 09:53 AM:

not bad at all

really

6,5,?

__________________
(*)- ALL ABOUT THE COVERS - http://www.IWILLPAYVCDQTOADVERTISE.com -(*)

(*)- PLEASE JOIN OUR FORUM - http://www.IWILLPAYVCDQTOADVERTISE.com -(*)

ENJOY


Posted by habsfan2 on 01-29-2006 10:10 AM:

very fast release, but poor quality, even for a cam.The pixellation made me dizzy, and the sound was hollow.The movie' s also poor, very poor.Not even accidentally funny.

3/5/2


Posted by ol_perfesser on 01-29-2006 01:41 PM:

Its a cam, probably a silver source. Cropped a bit too much, especially for the title sequence, a little blue, but some color (better than a lot) and hollow sound.
Props for quick release, but thats all.


6/6/5

__________________
Op


Posted by White Rabbit on 01-29-2006 03:00 PM:

ew, this looks a bit messy

v 5 (washed out, cropped to hell, bit of a slant/angle, blurry, a bit pixelated)

a 5 (not the best cam audio ive heard)

m ? (the first film wasnt bad)

thanks PRiDEVCD but get a better supply these silvers suck

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.


Posted by lala1234 on 01-29-2006 03:34 PM:

From the sample, picture is alright for being the first release cam, but audio is MAD quiet:

V-7
A-3
F-?


Posted by immun3 on 01-29-2006 03:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PlanetSmasher
I'm sorry but personally this is a poor release the quality is not worth it, it's cropped zoomed and has a mad slant to it. The Audio is hollow, and for the most part not clear enough to understand what is going on.

As for those who kept saying Remember this is a CAM, that's right it is a cam, and being a cam has nothing to do with the POOR quality of the picture, the audio is excusable as it's a cam, but a cam is only a TS with indirect audio, which in my opinion means we should be able to see a nice clear picture with poor audio. I grabbed 5 rars of cd1 and 3 of cd2 plus sample, and personally this is not worth the download.

Props to the group for a very quick release, speed on release is excellent, but I think the quality suffered for it!!



Exactly, a very nice summary there^^^

Im surprised at the 7's being given out!!

Lets take a comparison with PreVail's recent Annapolis CAM.....now there is a 7!! This PrideVCD rls is way below that!! Everyone is entitled to their own opinion so thats fine.

And to Kevlar about his little TS SVCD comment, a nice little rant but get your facts right before you begin to criticise


Posted by NoNe23 on 01-29-2006 04:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ol_perfesser
Its a cam, probably a silver source.



Yea Im Thinking Its A Silver too, most cam groups are all silver's. Was surprised to see that hydro didnt get this one out first...I'll wait for a TC or a SCREENER, or a well done TS

Video-5 (Is Kind of dull from the sample and pixelated)

Audio-5 (hollow and hard to kind of make out when listening to)

Movie-?

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.