VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Stay Alive *SVCD* - TELESYNC - ORC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=69444)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

maVen Just Released A TS Of there own which might be better then ORC's

However maven's release has a watermark on it

maven's
http://img474.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vlcsnap16489619us.png

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY

video is bluey tint and quite grainy

audio is alright , bit of line hiss.



mavens is much nicer video wise, audio is about the same. mavens is nuked for watermark and bad ar tho.

Maven

Maven likes to release in twos i wonder what there other release will be

LOL@ mavens release. what the hell, this isnt XDCC SCENE, your not supposed to watermark you shit. I just feel bad for the TMD leechers, now they have two watermarks to deal with tmd's and mavens. haha. As for orc's release, i think i would prefer it over mavens watermark shit.

After a few rars:

VIDEO: 7 looks really nice. (does have a bluetint, but doesnt really bother)

AUDIO: 7 looks as if orc has an audio supplier again because thier last 2 rel's were ts.

MOVIE: not sure.

At first I thought maVen watermarked the sample only.... yup I was wrong .... full fim is watermarked. Cheers for the movie but whats up with so many different releases of bad films

As for this release

Video: 7
Sound: 7
Movie: God Awful :P

Re: Maven

quote:

---

Originally posted by bigbug41
Maven likes to release in twos i wonder what there other release will be

---

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY

Re: Maven

quote:

---

Originally posted by bigbug41
Maven likes to release in twos i wonder what there other release will be

---

__________________
DoMiNaToR RuLeS

It doesnt take a genious to realise - Avoid this release!

ORC's Copy
Super fucked up encoding, groups fault. Its overcropped to hell, because they overcropped it the picture is squished to hell. This copy is dark as hell and you cant make out half the screen. The colors are extremly dull almost to the point it looks like a black and white movie. Audio is only thing going good for this release. FTF in the house?

V - 3.5
A - 7
M - ?

maVen's Copy
Good AR, excellent color's, no dark flickering around the edges. Downfall is motionblurness and that stupid watermark. Audio is also good. 1 CD is also better then 2.

V - 7
A - 7
M - ?

Final Thought:

ORC's copy looks like something TMD encoded.

maVen's copy is much the much nicer of the two and very watchable. Just has a crappy watermark. With "The Scene" being 90% reencode groups - can you blame them?

__________________

erm

quote:

---

Originally posted by 0LdTiMeR
It doesnt take a genious to realise - Avoid this release!

ORC's Copy
Super fucked up encoding, groups fault. Its overcropped to hell, because they overcropped it the picture is squished to hell. This copy is dark as hell and you cant make out half the screen. The colors are extremly dull almost to the point it looks like a black and white movie. Audio is only thing going good for this release. FTF in the house?

V - 3.5
A - 7
M - ?

maVen's Copy
Good AR, excellent color's, no dark flickering around the edges. Downfall is motionblurness and that stupid watermark. Audio is also good. 1 CD is also better then 2.

V - 7
A - 7
M - ?

Final Thought:

ORC's copy looks like something TMD encoded.

maVen's copy is much the much nicer of the two and very watchable. Just has a crappy watermark. With "The Scene" being 90% reencode groups - can you blame them?

---

__________________
-
word

ORC's Copy 2

Better?

At least the first picture gives you an idea of how big the black bars (crop) is compaired to the actual screen :|

Also in this second JPG. Is that a yellow beard he has ??

.. and wow Enter flame me some more for stating an opinion backed by facts i mean you totally missed the first post 4 NO FLAMING and replyed with saying a bunch of stuff that makes no sence towards the quality of the film. I also find it funny being called gay from someone who keeps posting links from vcdquality with no picture attached not once but twice

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by 0LdTiMeR
ORC's Copy 2

Better?

At least the first picture gives you an idea of how big the black bars (crop) is compaired to the actual screen :|

Also in this second JPG. Is that a yellow beard he has ??

---

__________________
-
word

get mavens xvid nice crip pic nice sound top TS

but this release aint to bad

7.6/?

6/7/you know what they say about a movie that can fit on 1 disc.

__________________
I Just Want to Be like Radiohead, And do something ingenious.

quote:

---

Originally posted by EViL-EWoK
you know what they say about a movie that can fit on 1 disc.

---

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.

---

Not bad, 2.35:1 AR seems odd but not bad...doesnt seem cropped at all to me although the colors are really really bland and kind of grayscale.


Overall nice rls, but not great. Movie was a indep pg horror flick says it all


7/7/2

not bad

v-6
a-6
???