VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Inside Man *PROPER* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - CAMERA (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=69523)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Movie

Very watchable.... ok video... grainy but watchable. The sound is great. Maybe direct. Good movie.

Video is pixelated and blurry. Somewhat overcropped on the sides, but not that bad. Audio seems to go out of sync at some points but quickly goes back in sync. Movie was decent. Better than most out right now.

Video: 6

Audio: 7

Movie: 8

people who vote on movies

everybody here sucks donkey dick never ever will i ever take any notice of the voting system again the retards that vote on these just vote 10,s or 1,s total waste of my time every release ive downloaded of late has been quite fine but got rating like 4 out of 10 ive been checking these so called retards out and they are total divs that have voted 10,s or 1 on every release that comes out i suggest people just go by there gut as the people who join this are total clowns

:: Cretin.

Sry, but why is it not needed? This seems a fine release to me?

V:5

S:7

F:?

Well where do we begin? Lets see a 1 being the worst apparently not watchable at all and a 10 being PERFECT uhh DVD quality. What is so damn hard about rating a movie? Just because it's watchable and i seen a lot of shity quality ,watchable movies, you dont rate it a 7.

to the poster above me,

why rate a dvd rip in the same category as a cam? we all know that a dvd is going to be better quality then a cam, so it makes sense to rate a cam vs a cam, and a ts vs a ts, and a scr vs a scr, and a dvdscr vs a dvdscr, a tc vs a tc, and a dvdrip vs dvdrip. a 10 for a telesync means that it is the best of the best, like centropy used to be. if a dvdrip is perfect, then it gets a 10; if it has motion issues, or is not in sync, or not correct bitrate, then it is not worth a 10, it would be worth a 10 if it was a perfect job by the group (and even then sometimes they only get 9/9 because the source may not have been mastered correctly). ive said this a lot before, and I know a lot of other people have as well, I just do not understand the point of rating every kind of release on 1 scale, but then again those that do that just really dont care about the scene and probably get their releases off bt or emule...

__________________
Dust myself up
and I scream at the sky
It's been so hard
but I can't let it die
Turn my head up,
looking at the stars
So many years,
I still wonder where you are?
Dust myself up
and I scream at the sky
Every day I ask myself why?
So much pain pouring
from inside
Above me I feel the spirit fly

I have to agree with some of what st3v13b is saying some people are making a mockery of the voting system and just voting low for who they don't like and high for who they do like. Keep it impartial guys or you will get the site a bad rep.

the video is roughly the same quality as the TFF release, which is cropped a fair bit, audio is better though and its still watchable

v- 6
a - 8
m - 7

Re: people who vote on movies

quote:

---

Originally posted by st3v13b
everybody here sucks donkey dick never ever will i ever take any notice of the voting system again the retards that vote on these just vote 10,s or 1,s total waste of my time every release ive downloaded of late has been quite fine but got rating like 4 out of 10 ive been checking these so called retards out and they are total divs that have voted 10,s or 1 on every release that comes out i suggest people just go by there gut as the people who join this are total clowns

:: Cretin.

---

I don't think this is a bad release by any means, not as if it's mislabled or anything.

Video 7

Audio 8 - Better than most recent TS' IMO

Movie 8

__________________
The Point Of Life Is Simply To Live!

quote:

---

why rate a dvd rip in the same category as a cam? we all know that a dvd is going to be better quality then a cam, so it makes sense to rate a cam vs a cam, and a ts vs a ts, and a scr vs a scr, and a dvdscr vs a dvdscr, a tc vs a tc, and a dvdrip vs dvdrip. a 10 for a telesync means that it is the best of the best, like centropy used to be. if a dvdrip is perfect, then it gets a 10; if it has motion issues, or is not in sync, or not correct bitrate, then it is not worth a 10, it would be worth a 10 if it was a perfect job by the group (and even then sometimes they only get 9/9 because the source may not have been mastered correctly).

---

6/7/8

dis is better than de wuf version innit, non of dat blue screen shit, its a squelch free zone sesh

v = 7
a = 7
m = 8

oh yeh, who takes notice of the votin shit, just dload the fookin sample & use brainjuice.

Why is this nuked?

cropped to fuck, bitrate of about 7, washed out, and generally crap.
audio out of sync in places.

4/5/?

Thats a great solid Review.



of a VCD you obviously didnt watch.



Video - 7 - Pixelated but DEFINITLEY not very cropped. only what appears to be on the left/right.

Sound - 8 - GREAT sound. no sync issues I noticed, only 1 minor desync in cd1..

Movie - 9 - great flick

I lurk the vcdquality.com comments section for most releases where I have interest in downloading the movie. I have never posted before but I felt compelled to reply to the issues of the voting / rating system and throw my $.02s in. I appreciate anyone who takes the time to reply and critique a release. I believe there are many people who read the comments section as I do when deciding to download a movie or not. Sure, you could just view the sample, but this doesn't necessarily take care off all necessary issues that need to be critiqued in a film. A good example of that is audio sync issues.

A number without a comment means really little. For one person they might rank the audio high because they've only seen the sample and not seen any of the sync issues. For another person they might rank the audio a lot lower because sync issues overly bother them more than most. While I agree with KrackZaa on how categorized ratings should go, you see that even people would disagree on what a 1 and 10 would be.

Which brings me to my point about how I believe the system can be improved. Instead of focusing on a meaningless number that has a predisposed bias based upon any given person, how about rating the video/audio/movie based on a "poor,fair/average,good" system with comments and by type. Also preceeding this rating you say how much or little of the movie you've seen that you base this opinion on.

Example:
I have not seen this movie(obviously you would put either you watched the entire movie or the sample here but I have not):
V: average for TS - slightly pixelated,probably slightly cropped on the sides but not too bad
A: good for TS - quality is definitely good but has some minor sync issues
M: did not see yet

If you want numbers you'd simply look at the supposedly flawed(even though they don't seem that off to me when you cross check them with the comments) rating, but if you sift through comments usually you want words.

VIDEO: 6

AUDIO: 5

MOVIE: 7

Another dam average release, where have all the good one's gone????????????????

__________________
THE HAMMERMAN IS HERE

Release is watchable and Good movie. But pixelated, nothing but the average....I would wait for a better copy to come out


Video: 5.3
Audio: 6.0