VCDQuality Forums
Show all 16 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Ultraviolet *REAL* *PROPER* *XviD* - DVD SCR - PUKKA (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=69896)


Posted by X69 on 04-29-2006 01:21 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by jbm666 on 04-29-2006 01:24 AM:

i don't know. . . still looks like it has dropped frames. only watched sample though


Posted by CyberLync on 04-29-2006 04:01 PM:

From sample; Looks pretty nice, a lot better than the other rls's by far! If you wanna watch the movie, grab this copy.

8/8/?


Posted by kawasabi on 04-29-2006 04:20 PM:

Of all the releases this one is by far the best.

8/8/3

Did't see any frame drops on this one.


Posted by Nick13 on 04-29-2006 05:09 PM:

It's just right. The best release up to date. Props to PUKKA! Very sweeet!

To the guy who says something about frames drop: Do yourself a favor, donate your computer to Kindergarten, if they take it (unlikely).

8.8 / 8.8 / 8.0


Posted by mrcool132 on 04-29-2006 07:02 PM:

any scrollers or black and white scenes??


Posted by wiuvstwvr on 04-29-2006 09:45 PM:

8/8/8

Grabbed and deleted 3 versions in 24 hrs, this is the keeper - for now. At least until the DVD comes out, hopefully soon.


Posted by druss on 04-29-2006 09:48 PM:

^^^^nice to say mate but from a kidergarten kid whats the difference between a 8.8 and a 8.7 ???? or even a 8.6

geeze...

8/7/shite

i remember decimal points but really...stop being a retard.

91.675% of what you said is good the rest i just ignore....

__________________
my wifes a sex object..when i say sex she objects


Posted by Trabausius on 04-30-2006 12:11 AM:

This is the release to get.

V: 8
A: 8
M: 2 (I couldnt even watch it all the way. What a pile of shit.)


Posted by 3bagsfull on 04-30-2006 01:11 AM:

Much better copy than other releases.

Picture 8
Audio 7
Movie 4

Another unkillable, come back from death movie.
Fighting scenes & technology were great though.


Posted by mrcool132 on 04-30-2006 02:40 AM:

any scrollers or black and white scenes?


Posted by hairless69 on 04-30-2006 05:04 AM:

Good release, except for blur on top right corner. Also b/w scenes and the annoying text that scrolls across the screen. Audio is
good also. I agree, best release to date!


Posted by protekt0r on 04-30-2006 05:42 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by hairless69
Good release, except for blur on top right corner. Also b/w scenes and the annoying text that scrolls across the screen. Audio is
good also. I agree, best release to date!



Ummm... yeah... that's what most real screeners do. And the "blur" in the top right hand corner is a watermark/serial number. They cover it up so they don't get busted.

Video: 9. Damn good for a DVDSCR
Audio: 8. Sounded fine to me
Movie: 5. The CGI's in this sucked balls... thought I was in the early 1990's er summin'. The story was lame too.

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by archyontop on 05-01-2006 06:14 PM:

Ummm... yeah... that's what most real screeners do. And the "blur" in the top right hand corner is a watermark/serial number. They cover it up so they don't get busted.

Video: 8.
Audio: 8.
Movie: 5.

THE REASON FOR THE CGI, IS BECAUSE WHEN SOME STUDIOS "RELEASE" SCREENERS, SOME CGI SCREENS AREN'T FULLY RENDERED, SO WHAT YOU SEE IS AN QUICK, HALF DONE CGI SCENE... I WOULD HOLD IT AGAINST THE MOVIE

__________________
"...I'd rather have and not need, than need and not have..."


Posted by olddirtyogre on 05-10-2006 10:53 PM:

Lightbulb

quote:
Originally posted by archyontop
Ummm... yeah... that's what most real screeners do. And the "blur" in the top right hand corner is a watermark/serial number. They cover it up so they don't get busted.

Video: 8.
Audio: 8.
Movie: 5.

THE REASON FOR THE CGI, IS BECAUSE WHEN SOME STUDIOS "RELEASE" SCREENERS, SOME CGI SCREENS AREN'T FULLY RENDERED, SO WHAT YOU SEE IS AN QUICK, HALF DONE CGI SCENE... I WOULD HOLD IT AGAINST THE MOVIE



On your note of the CGI being purposly downgraded, I would have to say you're wrong. The man who directed this movie also directed a great movie byt the name of Equillibrium, and since seeing Equillibrium I have somewhat followed his recent projects, Ultra Violet being one of them. The fact is the studio cut his budget before he was done making the movie and tore the shit out of it in the editing room. The CGI you see in this screener is in fact what was in theaters, it really is crap. The director himself was terribly upset about how his film turned out because the studio pretty much kicked him in the nuts and took away his project for no reason. What you see in this movie is pretty much what the studio wanted, not what the director wanted. But I have heard rumors that the director was able to get his hand back into his project with some more money to fix the effects and create a real "directors cut" of this flick, I just hope this rumor is true because this film had a lot of potential.


Posted by Rounder98 on 05-13-2006 08:05 PM:

This screener is the one to get

V / 9 it was good minus what others have said

A / 8.5

M / if what you say olddirtyogre is true that really does suck. I felt that the lack of CGI or the poor effort there really held this movie back, its really too bad. Here's hoping for a Director's cut because then maybe this movie can be salvished

__________________
Arguing with a liberal is like arguing with an idiot, they lower you to their level and beat you with experience.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.
Show all 16 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.