VCDQuality Forums
Show all 14 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Simone *iNTERNAL* - TELESYNC - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=7010)


Posted by razzy on 08-25-2002 07:36 PM:

RE-ENCODE!!!!!


Posted by ewfbootlegga on 08-25-2002 07:39 PM:

Haven't been able to get a hold of the sample yet but the jpg's look pretty decent. Its funny how people see FTF as the release then automatically give bad reviews. I mean come on the same movie between two release groups is getting a movie rating of 2 points off. People see FTF and automatically vote 1/1/1. JPG looks as good if not better then the other release and once I check the sample I can give a better review. I hope the audio is better because if it is then I will be getting this one. So far the last couple FTF releases have been pretty damn decent.


Posted by K-FleX on 08-25-2002 07:40 PM:

Looks LiKE Same Source


Posted by crapper on 08-25-2002 08:12 PM:

lol 2 sources
i guesse ftf didnt take the race..

i guesse the ftf is better but i'm still lookin for there sample..

amazin same source same day..

isnt it funny..

maybe the ny streets peeps days are gettin a bit over the top..
maybe they should focus on asain tc's (yep there still ou thtere there jkust subbed.. but amazin quality..

but never see em cuase some topsites dont accept subbed..


Posted by Rep- on 08-25-2002 08:45 PM:

This is a nice release. However, it isn't that much better than ESOTERiC's, so instead of getting their asses flamed just made it iNTERNAL. That is what everyone's flames get. They flame FTF because they release it after another release and it isn't a ton better, so now they are making it harder to get your hands on because its internal...


Posted by devilbeast on 08-25-2002 08:53 PM:

I found the sample for this and started grabbing it..........but then i got dropped, maybe it wasnt rly it and they didnt want me to get it who knows i only got like 3 seconds so ii cant even watch it to see what it was, homefully this has better sound than the esoteric who knows


Posted by rappa on 08-25-2002 09:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crapper
lol 2 sources
i guesse ftf didnt take the race..

i guesse the ftf is better but i'm still lookin for there sample..

amazin same source same day..

isnt it funny..

maybe the ny streets peeps days are gettin a bit over the top..
maybe they should focus on asain tc's (yep there still ou thtere there jkust subbed.. but amazin quality..

but never see em cuase some topsites dont accept subbed..



wtf r u talking bout..u sound like a retard.....i havent seen an asian tc and if u knew anything, if a grp rlsed it that affills a site, they dont nuke it, every1 rls wat they can if its better then anything out so please stfu...Also how would u know there still out there...do u live in asia?

This releases sound is also alot better then ESO's......Eso's is also outta sync imo..

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by Elder on 08-25-2002 11:46 PM:

http://www.dictionary.com


Posted by hoozdapimp on 08-26-2002 12:30 AM:

after seeing both samples i don't see how it's possible that ftf has a lower rating....the sound is much better in this one (not out of sync) and also the video is pretty much equal quality.

also, why did the movie part of the rating get 9 on eso and only 6 on ftf? lol...you guys are weird

6.5/6.5/?


Posted by Azrael626 on 08-26-2002 04:37 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by hoozdapimp
after seeing both samples i don't see how it's possible that ftf has a lower rating....the sound is much better in this one (not out of sync) and also the video is pretty much equal quality.

also, why did the movie part of the rating get 9 on eso and only 6 on ftf? lol...you guys are weird

6.5/6.5/?



It's because ppl like to suck the dick of ESO/TCF, and they love to rag on FTF for being FTF. No movie on this site ever gets reviewed for it's quality, it gets reviewed for the group that rlsed it. It's pathetic.


Posted by KevN2002 on 08-26-2002 08:19 PM:

Its because its the truth, there is no reason they should release crap when they can take a few more hours and do it right. The average CEETEEPEE release looks better than a screener from FTF or ESO.


Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-26-2002 09:55 PM:

both these hit my top site at the same time the other day, i went with with the true blue ftf version!! better quality

i dont go near erostic or whoever they r, i learned my lesson on a few downloads i got from them!

i still got heart burn from it


Posted by brr8760 on 08-27-2002 05:51 AM:

I luv FTF but they were smart to go internal on this-- the eso version is a little better and this place would have been overrun with flaming lamers.

Props to the previous posters who are recognizing that FTF has improved their quality and actually (gasp) releases a lot of movies! We have to give these groups their due or they will ditch us without a second thought.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by ewfbootlegga on 08-27-2002 10:47 AM:

Why can we not have a thread without people bringing *** into it? Who gives a fuck about what they used to do. Stop comparing groups to them. *** is dead to most so get over it k?


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 AM.
Show all 14 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.