VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Click (2006) - CAM - RPT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=70767)


Posted by X69 on 06-24-2006 03:30 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by xplicit on 06-24-2006 03:39 PM:

That's what i like to see, good honest nfo writing.

Not a bad release... typical cam


Posted by GetWidIt on 06-24-2006 04:03 PM:

I agree xplicit. Takes alot of balls to say a silver better than a home made. As you say typical cam it is. Nice one too. video is good. Audio is understandable bits of laughter but what do you expect its a cam and its a comedy. well done on quickness as well!!! keep them coming

6/6/?


Posted by Arsenal_2005 on 06-24-2006 04:15 PM:

They must be using a crap cam if this silver was better then there "home made" one.

maybe investing in a better cam might help lol.

overall its watchable not the best cam or not the worst.

V - 5.5
A - 5
M - should be ok like adam

__________________
Please all newbies STOP Messaging me asking when you can download samples from or where to get the films from. i DO NOT give out this information. Thanks


Posted by nic70 on 06-24-2006 04:23 PM:

i gave it

7 for video because it got all of the screen and it is a little bit dark and fuzzy and a lil unclear but really good 4 first release very watchable

6 for sound not that clear but hearable


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 06-24-2006 04:39 PM:

Watchable enough, if a bit on the dark side. Sounds like some bloke in the audience has a case of tonsilitis coming to him though!

Decent enough quality from the sample, movie looks so-so so err....there.


Posted by sprinter on 06-24-2006 05:08 PM:

A nice cam little dark but ok good job

Thanks


Posted by isingintheban on 06-24-2006 05:49 PM:

Not bad for a cam. The movie is bright so that's good.

__________________
hurf durf


Posted by LionRoar on 06-24-2006 05:59 PM:

isinginthebanned if its not bad for a cam why vote 4/4/1? :S


Good release


7/6/7


Audience laughing good cam though

__________________
http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg


Posted by x1covers-mojo on 06-24-2006 06:17 PM:

Waste of fucking bandwidth!!!! I'd rather watch the grass grow!!! JESUS CHRIST....BUY A NEW FUCKING CAMERA!!!!


Video - 1
Audio - 3
Movie - Who knows....can't see the fucking thing!!!


Posted by LionRoar on 06-24-2006 06:19 PM:

::NEVER POST HERE AGAIN

__________________
http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg


Posted by Horton on 06-24-2006 06:55 PM:

:: ARGH


Posted by EnglishLad on 06-24-2006 07:06 PM:

Nice release watchable will wait for better


7/6/?


Posted by Rep- on 06-24-2006 07:23 PM:

Eh, its a cam, you expect laughing in a comedy, and video is ok. Movie had funny parts, but wasn't one of Sandler's best....

5/5/6


Posted by blitzman on 06-24-2006 07:47 PM:

movie

movie was alright, watchable if you really want to see it but would wait for another release if not.

4/4/9


Posted by Horton on 06-24-2006 09:37 PM:

:: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK


Posted by Mongoloid on 06-24-2006 09:39 PM:

Sofar based on several rars :

V - 3.. too much wrong with it
A - 3.. not up to par and with filters could have been better
M - no idea yet.. will edit when i watched the whole thing but that wont prolly be this release.

If the group would have spend 3 more hours properly encoding the video, and 1 more hour fixing the sound with some standard filters ppl tend to use, they prolly still would be first, but at least it would have been a watchable cam. Then again it's not exactly a new phenomenon that emphasis is on trying to win a race with no regards to quality, so I dont even know why I'm bothering whining about it
I'll shut my trap


Posted by Djshrew on 06-25-2006 12:00 AM:

Looks pants to me, V Dark and audio sounds muffled. overall i think i will wait for a better release, as i want to see this movie.

3/3/?


Posted by Anno on 06-25-2006 12:58 AM:

Agree with everything Mongoloid says.
He pretty much sums this pre up and i agree with his 3/3 rating.

:: DONGS


Posted by rattlesnake20 on 06-25-2006 01:21 AM:

:: NO U


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.