VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- Rambo (2008) R1 *NTSC* - DVDRIP - EMERALD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=81119)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

appears to be a little on the screwed up side....

not sure right now whats wrong with it (not had time to check properly) but seems to have a few menu errors etc.

From a quick scan,

V 10 (untouched(?)

A 10

M 7

__________________

I can't find any menu errors. Maybe you burnt a bad copy?

No complaints really on the playback quality. Looks and sounds perfect to me.

Video - 9.9
Audio - 9.9, 5.1 and 2.0 track. Sounds great.
Movie - 8.5, Best action film I've seen in a while. As good as the first three if you ask me.

__________________
O-Qua Tangin Wan

Works fine for me. But personaly I prefer the Rambo.2008.R4.NTSC.DVDR-FA release better. Even on my 52" HDTV the R4 1.78:1 just looks better than the R1 2.35:1 anamorphic... which looks squashed down. Anyway nice release with no problems here.

9
9
9 GORY!

error using good old DVD shrink 3.2

hrmmmm

I did 2 screen captures of the very beginning when the truck rolls into scene...

It seems this release 2.35:1 vs the r4 release which has 1.78:1 aspect ratio....

This release has the equivalent of say... just my eyeballing it...

On the left/right sides... maybe about 6 or 7 pixels per side... more...
The top is cut maaaybe about 2-3 pixels...
The bottom however... jeez.. easily there is a good 25-30 pixels blasted from the scene...

Soooo... the r4 definitely shows more up/down (way more on the bottom) and just an itty bitty lost on the sides... than this release... however...

This release is progressive and the r4 is interlaced and it's very noticeable...

To say though that this video is untouched.. ? hmmm... dunno about all that jazz... if so... whoever made that decision was an idiot cause it definitely was a crapass encoding job...

:P

I'd rather have this version that that r4... actually rather have the dvd9 and do my own job on it...

V-8
A-9
M-8.5 nota bad atall )

__________________
Pentium II
128MB RAM
Voodoo 3 vid
4gb HDD
1.44 fdd
=)