VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- The Strangers *XviD* - SCREENER - OPTiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=82018)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

FS video. It's slightly fuzzy on the video and I think audio does have a lil hiss with it. But for a scr, it's great quality. I question when a r5 or retail will rls. This is the best copy to date though. This is done well unlike Pineapple.

8
8.5
?

EDIT: "LE" watermark right bottom corner, displays about 8-10 sec every 10 mins. Nothing too bad.

EDIT 2: Film I give a 5, fairly lame. Weak ending. Half way though there is another watermark "79" for about 8 sec in the right upper corner. I do question the film about how it was done (certain things, but not the spot to ask about it).

what do you guys think the source of this release would have been????

video very grainy - audio is good - movie was ok

rated as a screener

v 3 terrible grainy as if it was a tv channel that was not tuned in properly

a 5 hissy

m ?

how can someone give this an 8 its a screener for gods sake it wouldnt get a 6 if it was a cam its awful,if you are going to review something then at least be honest and sensible

Based on the above not sure what it is. Grainy indeed but still better then vast majority of declared crappy cam/TS releases. Audio OK but has this hum from the beginning. Does dissipate. Overall entirely watchable. Movie good thriller. Tyler a hottie.

7/7/7.5

Ive just been on the official site and its due for dvd and blu ray release just before halloween 21/10/08.

So im guessing a dvdrip will be just before that?:-)

Stolen from STG

V- 6
A- 8.5
M- 8

Good scr, will tide me over until retail

The P2p Group STG must be very proud of OPTiC, especially the nfo about noone allowed to use "their" source.....


v = 6 below average
a = 7
m = wactching rest tonight


this group looks like a poor man's mvs.

__________________
SeeDee MKII

optic gives the word fail a bad name....

v: 5 bad rip from hotel on demand it seems...
a: 6 hiss
m: couldnt watch the whole way through

Yes STG did release this first, and that is the copy I watched..but...who cares. If this is like the STG release it's really bad quality for a Screener, but definitely watchable. Small "LE" in the bottom right corner and a small "79" in the upper right corner.

STG:

V-6.5 (Very fuzzy, not sharp, pixelated)
A-7/7.5 (Hiss/buzz, but for the most part was understandable)
M-? (Watched it but am still undecided..)

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3

Picture very grainy, audio hiss. Movie had a certain quality but ultimately was more like a film-student project. They sure saved on the locations budget!

v-6
a-5
m-4

V:- 6 - Grainy and pixalated
A:- 3 - Awful buzz/hiss that made me turn off after 15 mins
M:- ?? - As above didn't watch