VCDQuality Forums
Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- City of Ember *XviD* - DVD SCR - OPTiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=83777)


Posted by X69 on 01-06-2009 09:46 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED



*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by danarchy on 01-06-2009 10:32 PM:

NUKED: mislabeled.VHS.screener_p2p.source

I could be wrong (more than likely) but this looks like a DVD screener to me. I've never seen a VHS screener in widescreen and the picture looks too sharp to be VHS.


Posted by Objectivist S on 01-06-2009 11:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by danarchy
NUKED: mislabeled.VHS.screener_p2p.source

I could be wrong (more than likely) but this looks like a DVD screener to me. I've never seen a VHS screener in widescreen and the picture looks too sharp to be VHS.



I HAVE seen WS VHS Screeners.

Just look at the 25th Hour VHS Screener from years ago.

Yes, and that release gezzer.

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3


Posted by gezzer on 01-06-2009 11:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by danarchy
NUKED: mislabeled.VHS.screener_p2p.source

I could be wrong (more than likely) but this looks like a DVD screener to me. I've never seen a VHS screener in widescreen and the picture looks too sharp to be VHS.



Pukka's body of lies was a widescreen vhs screener
This looks and sounds ok to me as long as I can watch it they can label it eek the cat if they like.Free anyway.
as vhs screener 9/9/?


Posted by DKilnapp on 01-07-2009 02:01 AM:

As a widescreen VHS Screener

Audio: 8
Video: 7.5 (lower rating due to occasional water marks middle lower and upper right, which are distracting but they only last for five or six seconds and B & W scenes lasting ten seconds or so occasionally also).
Movie: 7 Entertaining for the kids.


Posted by split710 on 01-07-2009 09:51 AM:

uhk

one of the most funny nuke never seen.

nuker is probably 8 years old (not more), he never seen a VHS before becouse born in dvd era.

it's a real dvd and is a very good release too.

as for as i know the release is not nuked anymore

UnNuked: fine.real.dvd.source_VHS.system.has.COMPLETELY.another.quality_i40.tinypic.com.2h7qhwg.jpg

video = 8
audio = 9


Posted by robert_sole on 01-07-2009 11:37 AM:

its a good version but retail DVD hits the stores on January 20th so expect the dvdrip very soon.


Posted by res1492 on 01-07-2009 01:43 PM:

Re: uhk

quote:
Originally posted by split710
one of the most funny nuke never seen.

nuker is probably 8 years old (not more), never seen a VHS before because he was born in the DVD era.




I agree

What a complete and utter knob
This IS a DVD scr

V=7 seen better scr
A=8
M=?


Posted by NorQue on 01-07-2009 02:44 PM:

Commenting on the Screenshots here, but this shouldn't matter for this calculation:

According to Wikipedia VHS has a vertical resolution of around 320 pixel - with a 2.35:1 aspect ratio this would be 182 Pixel in height, if it was possible to perfectly map VHS resolution to a digital picture. In reality there would be some loss in quality during digitalization... the VCDQ and the unnuke screenshots on the other hand don't look like that low resolution at all. Of course, they could be "upscaled" to the 640x242 resolution that's given in the NFO, but from my experience this would look much worse, much blurrier, like the picture given as an example in the unnuke.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 AM.
Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.