VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Signs *PROPER* - SCREENER - EWS (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=8862)

awesome!

Awesome! Another new group that re-encodes! We can never have too many

Hint: notice the sarcasm

6/6/6

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

just wondering, how do you know it's a re-encode??

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net

How do you not know? Look at EM's version and then take a look at this. Doesn't take a genius to figure that out, maybe you haven't checked the signs.vcd-sample.ews.mpg.

How does he know???

Because hes a not jackass and knows what the sample looks like... It looks like the same source but its okay quality...

Forgot my Rating... 6/6/8

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

I saw sample, but I dont have them side-by-side for detail comparison and analysis. Thank you for your wise wisdom in detecting re-encodes though, ob-one !

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net

Next time, may the force be with you! As for the release, still kinda blurry and motion scenes are not so good and please EWS, next time make a sample longer than 20 seconds!

yeah why should we have 10 different movies in 2weeks when we can have 20 different re-encodes from the same movie and same source in just one week (btw 80% would be from new groups *caugh-caugh*).... so let us go praise for them

TEG or TCF will bring the *REAL PROPER* (Hopefully)

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

6/7/8
good job!

you dumbasses...they already said it was from the same source...
they said in the nfo that the last rls was too dark, a little too much background noise, etc...they're not claiming to have a different source.

Well its good... i think..lol ... 7/7/7

__________________
Kill the FUCKIN RHINO.

this is realy getting out of haND now.

so what the hell is *PROPER* about it and which version is it more proper than ??

those f** new groups should stay by the rules and write down in their nfo what they have done better. cause thats what nfo's are for

quote:

---

Originally posted by spectra
so what the hell is *PROPER* about it and which version is it more proper than ??

those f** new groups should stay by the rules and write down in their nfo what they have done better. cause thats what nfo's are for

---

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

What fucking rules? The getting movies for free rules? Oh last time i checked the rules were YOUR GETTING MOVIES FOR FREE SO PLEASE DON'T SAY WE SUCK, CAUSE YOU CANT DO BETTER. Is that the rule?

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by The Booker Man
What fucking rules? The getting movies for free rules? Oh last time i checked the rules were YOUR GETTING MOVIES FOR FREE SO PLEASE DON'T SAY WE SUCK, CAUSE YOU CANT DO BETTER. Is that the rule?

---

then don't get it. I actually do see a point for this release. I hate movie releases that have a hiss in the audio. This one doesn't and is a better encode of the same source. THat to me is worth a proper.

quote:

---

Originally posted by ebeats
just wondering, how do you know it's a re-encode??

---

hrm

the video is not clear, and the audio is fine on my pc, but skips like a mofo on my dvd player

hopefully somebody will release a real proper, with a clear picture, and proper sound