VCDQuality Forums - The Four Feathers *PROPER* - TELESYNC

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Four Feathers *PROPER* - TELESYNC - A-Team (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=9165)

Posted by moviedan713 on 10-03-2002 12:35 AM:

wow havent got the sample. i rate by jpegs.

Posted by moviedan713 on 10-03-2002 12:47 AM:

great release. im suprised with the 2 copies. i thought this would never get released and people would forget bout it. I think this is a limited movie.

The.Four.Feathers.TS-FTF
The.Four.Feathers.TS-ATeam

both great releases.

finally ATeams first good release beside their shitty Stealing Harvord TS (CAM) .

Posted by bts on 10-03-2002 12:49 AM:

i have an idea..how bout groups STOP RELEASING PROPERS...if one is going to be shit...the next 7 are going to be shit until a screener..so go home and stop crying cause u didn't get the release first

Posted by korax on 10-03-2002 12:49 AM:

What about fear dot com proper that wasn't too bad heh
gotto give em props though they are getting better

Posted by gh0st_man on 10-03-2002 12:49 AM:

Why write before you see the actual thing? Who knows?
Anyway quality is better then the one before but not considerably so....

Posted by bmvtoys on 10-03-2002 12:58 AM:

....a proper was needed for this release. If your going to complain, at least tell us that you d/l the FTF one. IF you did, you would know why a proper was needed for this movie.

The FTF version was horrible.

b

Posted by IsoFAST on 10-03-2002 01:27 AM:

I'm not a flamer, but this release was not needed.

Last one was much better.

But thanks for trying.

Posted by neatz on 10-03-2002 01:44 AM:

nice work how ya guys did it i wish i new couse its a clean copy
next to that look at the release befor ya judge screen is wider wich means ftf cut lots out

Posted by Beaver35 on 10-03-2002 02:18 AM:

Did you people see the sample

If you did then there is no way you can say that this is worse than the other rsl. This rsl blows the other verson away..Come on folks please try to rate by the picture quality and not by the group putting it out..Who really cares, who gets it out as long as we can watch it and it's free we should be thanking these groups for trying not flaming them..

Posted by bts on 10-03-2002 02:45 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bmvtoys
....a proper was needed for this release. If your going to complain, at least tell us that you d/l the FTF one. IF you did, you would know why a proper was needed for this movie.

The FTF version was horrible.

b

you should have known better than to ever download something made by FTF ...fool

Posted by bmvtoys on 10-03-2002 02:48 AM:

funny, I can recollect a few good ftf releases, of course I see no releases with your name on it bts. Either way, this release is way better. Sound is wayyy better than the previous.

Picture is tight and has good color.
bts...go flame somewhere else.

b

Posted by cccmmm on 10-03-2002 06:48 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bts

you should have known better than to ever download something made by FTF ...fool

wow so the ftf haters aren't completely extinct. i thought all the flamers had moved along to a-team. i like both groups because they do decent work. some work is really great..like ftf's recent red dragon, and some isn't as great. but both groups try. i can't believe that one person has the nerve to say that a proper isn't necessary. why not? i really don't understand. its just one more thing to choose from. can your brains not frickin handle the challenge of choosing what you want. i'm happy when I come to vcdquality and see a new release, proper or not, good qual. or not. it means that groups are active and trying for everyone. lol so many people here need to chill out and stop saying crap. there have been releases that i've downloaded that sucked. big deal, i just go get a diff. one if i don't like it. i'm not mad at the group for putting it out.

Posted by desertboy on 10-04-2002 01:29 PM:

cofferscuffs 9/8/9
IsoFAST 3/2/n/a
Beaver35 8/8/8
Ziggs 10/10/8
papo1485 10/10/10
crob 10/10/10
neatz 10/10/10
Static 10/10/10
THE_DREAM 10/10/10
IrcOp 10/10/10
moviedan713 10/10/1
nokia 1/1/5
nightmare_1 1/1/1
PetahHFX 1/1/1
ace1 1/1/1
tko248 1/1/6
ownlos 1/1/1

3 maybe 4 real votes, stop being so fucking sad.

Consitent offenders who have no place here

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Posted by Ripper on 10-04-2002 02:52 PM:

See you lot bitch @ftf for quality
well what about red dragon 2 weeks pre to usa release
you were licking there balls that night i know just shows how many 2 faced there are on here

__________________
I was never caught!

Posted by blitzed on 10-04-2002 05:14 PM:

screener my ass this is coming from a tape that was captured with a capture card prolly got the tape in n.y from brooklyn or manhatten so the shit is mislabeled should be nucked for mislabel
am i right ftf

Posted by Touvex on 10-04-2002 08:10 PM:

yeahthe votes r full of 10s and 1s, the rating on this movie is fucking useless!!!!!

Posted by IsoFAST on 10-04-2002 10:17 PM:

I think out of that list, i have the only normal vote.

What's the deal with the 1/1/1 and 10/10/10

People obviously didn't view this.

Posted by neatz on 10-05-2002 07:06 AM:

Votes for The Four Feathers *PROPER* by A-Team

USERNAME VIDEO AUDIO MOVIE
nokia 1 1 5
moviedan713 10 10 1
nightmare_1 1 1 1
indemand 1 1 1
crob 10 10 10
neatz 10 10 10
tko248 1 1 6
Static 10 10 10
THE_DREAM 10 10 10
PetahHFX 1 1 1
Ziggs 8 7 8
IsoFAST 3 2 n/a
verbatim 1 1 1
Beaver35 8 8 8
papo1485 10 10 10
IrcOp 10 10 10
ace1 1 1 1
ownlos 1 1 1
cofferscuffs 9 8 9

thats is even funier when ya see ftf members votes
hum anyone no who they are lol......

Posted by demsumnutz on 10-05-2002 08:23 PM:

Ware is it?

Posted by Kane2k on 10-05-2002 09:32 PM:

Actually whats really funny is that you just posted the fact that you gave it a rating of 10/10/10 neatz, so maybe you shouldnt be one to talk about bs ratings. This forum was useful in determining actual release quality at some point in time, right?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 PM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page