VCDQuality Forums
Show all 16 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Ballistic: Ecks Vs Sever *PROPER* - TELESYNC - A-Team (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=9398)


Posted by ghEtto^ghOst on 10-09-2002 04:36 AM:

Lightbulb ;p

A-Team is movin up in the world, horray! Well from judging the sample, the pic is decent, bit grainy, but expected. Sound is pretty decent too for such a new release. Suprised to see this release coming from A-Team! Hopefully they're upping their standards.

Good work

8/7/8

P.S. - DOn't you all love some of the morons here who post 1/1/10 and what not. Now you know who the n00bs are.


Posted by jammi® on 10-09-2002 04:51 AM:

so they propered hemselves for this come on guys no wonder ppl flame and the film isnt all that aswell


Posted by gh0st_man on 10-09-2002 05:28 AM:

This movie doesn't deserve another verision!. Anyway found it too blurry unclear and overall a shitty shit. Don't expect this to be the proper proper :P.


Posted by neatz on 10-09-2002 05:51 AM:

i wish i new what ya ment i watched it the whole think and its dam good sound laud but dam good go ateam go!!!


Posted by pacmania_2001 on 10-09-2002 06:08 AM:

UTi need to teach a class in how to release a good quality movie. Video is way to blurry, sound was average.

6/6/Shit


Posted by CerealKid on 10-09-2002 06:20 AM:

I thought it was alrighty... i already watched the movie though... but if u havent got one and wanna see it get this one..

__________________
Kill the FUCKIN RHINO.


Posted by Orky on 10-09-2002 07:59 AM:

Why 2 cds when the release is only 48 (iirc) disks? It should easily fit on a 74 min cd then.

__________________
,,|,, ^_^ ,,|,,
DISCLAIMER:
When I write "Havn't seen it yet" in a moviereview about a new release I mean that I havn't seen the whole movie, only the sample.
"Written to avoid accusations of only judging by jpg"


Posted by neatz on 10-09-2002 08:09 AM:

its just highly compressed bin size 501 cd2 475 megs


Posted by dumwaldo on 10-09-2002 01:58 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jammi®
so they propered themselves...


the previous release was put out by QvD so they did not proper themself.

VIDEO:
heavy cropping! in the begining credits i am pretty sure every single name gets cut off in some way. however the title is dead center showing that at lest it is centered. during the movie i noticed few instances where the cropping disturbed the image on the screen. this also has what i call a 'muddy' picture. kinda hazy, kinda grainy, kinda dark but still viewable and IMHO even enjoyable. the quality held up well for me during action sequences.

AUDIO:
DAMN GOOD. not quite an out of the park home run but most definatley a stand up triple. good clean sound that is easy to understand through out. good enough sound that during gun battles i can still make out the background music.

my opinion...
vid = 6 (it was close to getting a 5 but i think its more watchable than a 5 rating)
audio = 8

BTW
CD1 = 43:37
CD2 = 41:25 (no credits at the end)
so no, it would not have fit on one disc without cutting about 5 minutes out of the movie itself.

__________________
what the hell do i know, i watch my movies on a 2.2" screen.

"pho est wonderful!" "pho est wonderful!" really, he is


Posted by Dankbuds on 10-09-2002 02:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dumwaldo


the previous release was put out by QvD so they did not proper themself.





QvD = A-Team *gasp*

Read their nfo they propered themselves. meaning they are QvD like that was a secret anyways everyone already knew that well i guess everyone but you.

__________________
The voices in my head are getting louder


Posted by dumwaldo on 10-09-2002 02:36 PM:

yeah and esoteric is really TCF and VideoCD is VCDistro and blah and blah and blah

its not possible for people to be involved with 2 groups so if someone is involved with 2 different groups then the groups are suddenly considered one group. thanks for the help understanding the scene. i dont know what i would have done had you not cleared that up for me. WHOOOOO

__________________
what the hell do i know, i watch my movies on a 2.2" screen.

"pho est wonderful!" "pho est wonderful!" really, he is


Posted by MrBoogedy on 10-09-2002 09:28 PM:

You must be dumb

It says right in the .NFO that they released the last one, and have just propered themselves. You're not only arguing with people in the forum, you're telling A-Team that you know more about them than they do. Read the .NFO.


Posted by IsoFAST on 10-10-2002 03:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dumwaldo
yeah and esoteric is really TCF and VideoCD is VCDistro and blah and blah and blah

its not possible for people to be involved with 2 groups so if someone is involved with 2 different groups then the groups are suddenly considered one group. thanks for the help understanding the scene. i dont know what i would have done had you not cleared that up for me. WHOOOOO



He is right Dumbwaldo, ateam is qvd, among other names.
I normaly dont get involved in disputes among members here, but i dont want you to look anymore dumb here.

But its a fact and Dankbuds is right.


Posted by impossible on 10-10-2002 05:39 AM:

Hmm, decided to write out a short review of this sad, sad release.
I don't think this is deserving of being a proper, and apparently most of you nukers out there agree. The video was just plain out blurry shit with a fucked up contrast. The colors wern't amazin' either. Audio, well, damn, I've heard better, but I've certainly heard worse (A-Team previous releases of course). As for the movie, I dunno, I certainly don't have a review of it from this ground-breaking release.

4/5/?


Posted by Orky on 10-10-2002 07:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by neatz
its just highly compressed bin size 501 cd2 475 megs


Ohh, I havn't got the release yet so I didn't know about that Usually it's just a few mbs compressed so that you could tell about movie lenght from the number of rars

__________________
,,|,, ^_^ ,,|,,
DISCLAIMER:
When I write "Havn't seen it yet" in a moviereview about a new release I mean that I havn't seen the whole movie, only the sample.
"Written to avoid accusations of only judging by jpg"


Posted by nokia on 10-10-2002 08:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dumwaldo
yeah and esoteric is really TCF and VideoCD is VCDistro and blah and blah and blah

its not possible for people to be involved with 2 groups so if someone is involved with 2 different groups then the groups are suddenly considered one group. thanks for the help understanding the scene. i dont know what i would have done had you not cleared that up for me. WHOOOOO

Er ESOTERiC really is TCF, it's their limited/ts division, I don't know about VideoCD and VCDistro though. Anyways, I found this release to be blurry and imo not watchable. Also, everyone is ranting and raving over the sound being good but it doesn't sound that great imo. Halfway between ts and cam basically, 4/6/8


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.
Show all 16 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.