never got around to watching this movie before, and the only thing i knew was that "affleck was the bomb in phantoms".

well.

he wasn't. it wasn't. waste of 90mins. utter tripe.

3/10

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

LOL

I liked it, it was pretty damn eerie for the first half, right up until it goes completely hollywood (you can tell the exact SECOND the movie takes that turn) and goes shitty. It's probably Affleck's weakest performance, but the other actors do ok. The ending shot was kinda cool too.

I've seen a lot worse, I'd give Phantoms a 6/10 or somethin

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

hmmm i knew this one was comming

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Hehe..I totally agree mate

__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bobby-Whiskey
[B]LOL

I liked it, it was pretty damn eerie for the first half, right up until it goes completely hollywood (you can tell the exact SECOND the movie takes that turn) and goes shitty. It's probably Affleck's weakest performance, but the other actors do ok. The ending shot was kinda cool too.

Read the book DEAN KOONES its far better than the movie.Of course once you have seen the film it alters your peseption of the storry completly.Still isnt that always the case.
the GODFATHER being the perfect example.

__________________
I,ll protect you from the hooded claw,and keep the vampires from your door.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged