VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DVDR > Dirty Dancing Havana Nights - DVDRIP - Replica
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
vip3r
Apr 2004


Porn Star

Dirty Dancing Havana Nights - DVDRIP - Replica

Well i don't know if it's just me..but the picture on this doesn't seem all that great for a DVDr. Sound is fine, but geez, i don't know about the pic..

8/10/?

::edit:: Now that i looked back at the Cold Mountain forum of the dvdr from replica, i saw some others discussing/complaining about the quality and encoding methods of their releases. So..maybe it isn't me. Someone let me know.

Last edited by vip3r on 06-19-2004 at 03:30 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-19-2004 03:26 PM
vip3r is offline Click Here to See the Profile for vip3r Click here to Send vip3r a Private Message Find more posts by vip3r Add vip3r to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
JoshNya
Jul 2002


Senior Member

NUKED-Dirty.Dancing.Havana.Nights.DVDR-Replica
NUKED 1x by xxxxxxx - crc.error

Ya, I'll wait for a proper, video sez untouched, dunno..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-19-2004 09:19 PM
JoshNya is offline Click Here to See the Profile for JoshNya Click here to Send JoshNya a Private Message Find more posts by JoshNya Add JoshNya to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porco556
Jan 2003


Senior Member

Ya... I can't trust Replica either anymore... Looked at the video and it was soft/blurry. Not impressed.

But then again, look at the movie. I seriously doubt the retail DVD was going to get special treatment either.

Not a huge loss IMO.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-19-2004 10:16 PM
porco556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porco556 Click here to Send porco556 a Private Message Find more posts by porco556 Add porco556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
initial
Jun 2004

Junior Member

Are you two stupid, aside from there being no actual reason for a group to make up a movie is untouched when it isn't. The movie is 86 min long common sense would dictate that a movie with that length only containing trailers as extras would most likely be untouched. Only thing wrong with this release is the crc errors and the content of this ridiculously dumb prequel/sequel.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-19-2004 11:33 PM
initial is offline Click Here to See the Profile for initial Click here to Send initial a Private Message Find more posts by initial Add initial to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
vip3r
Apr 2004


Porn Star

Well, whatever they did to it, it looks like shit compared to other dvdrs..whateva

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-20-2004 01:35 AM
vip3r is offline Click Here to See the Profile for vip3r Click here to Send vip3r a Private Message Find more posts by vip3r Add vip3r to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
initial
Jun 2004

Junior Member

Considering its untouched, it would most likely be a source issue, the dvdscreener of dirty dancing was horribly interlaced.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-20-2004 01:38 AM
initial is offline Click Here to See the Profile for initial Click here to Send initial a Private Message Find more posts by initial Add initial to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porco556
Jan 2003


Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by initial
Are you two stupid, aside from there being no actual reason for a group to make up a movie is untouched when it isn't. The movie is 86 min long common sense would dictate that a movie with that length only containing trailers as extras would most likely be untouched. Only thing wrong with this release is the crc errors and the content of this ridiculously dumb prequel/sequel.


As I mentioned... Video looks like crap. And also the movie sucked balls, so maybe the retail looks like shit to match film quality.

Anyways. As for your theory on 86 min movie means untouched video. It don't always work that way. Station Agent (most recent example) was 88 mins and the movie was 6 gigs on the retail. I had to downsample it to fit on a DVD-R without menu. So you never know what you're going to get...

And of course, you can't always trust what a group writes in their NFO. I myself have caught many lies (especially in bitrates) in NFOs, and I'm not talking about the innocent forgetting to change the name of the movie mistakes, talking obvious fumbles.

Last edited by porco556 on 06-20-2004 at 07:15 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 06-20-2004 07:13 AM
porco556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porco556 Click here to Send porco556 a Private Message Find more posts by porco556 Add porco556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdquality.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.