Mislabled TC

proof:
http://img158.exs.cx/img158/9361/check5sc.jpg

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

NUKE: mislabeled.TC(artifacts.all.over.the.movie)
UNNUKE: look.at.the.sample.nothing.there

...well nuke or not, the sample looks fine and of dvd quality. audio is excellent as well.

9/9/?

__________________
proto

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

from sample movie looks fine what are these dickwads on about i see no artifacts what so ever

edit
well it seams sample is not same scorce as main movie

Last edited by meadowdale on 03-02-2005 at 08:38 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Will stick with the TC until retail, looks nice a release anyway

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

looks like TC for me... but nice.. anyway better than old bfm tc rls

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Well I think it's Pretty damn good. I thought the TC sucked balls personally so I'm glad this is finally up.
Still a while till the retail aswell. Good Work

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This might be a TC, its not easy to tell, and if it was, then it far better than a DVD-Screener anyway, as the quality would be about the same, but it would probably have Watermarks.

The colours do look a little off though, and it could be sharper, but it better than the last release.

I have about a dozen Retail DVD's that have dirt and Burns on them, so why not this, Screeners are usually not mastered to as High Quality as Retail DVD's anyway.

8/7/6

Last edited by Redemption198 on 03-02-2005 at 09:27 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Just checked sample and scanned through the movie, and it sure looks the same to me.

Can't say if it's a really good TC or a bad DVD rip... sometimes it looks good, other times you get those bluish-greyish blacks that normally go with TCs :/

Either way I'll watch it I think.

Edit: Shocking revelation! Look at approx 55:42 into the movie, where the scene changes from Blade holding a baby to the next one - there is a very visible cigarette burn in the top right corner. And since I'm pretty sure cigarette burns only are for cinema reels, this must be a very good TC: nuke should stand.

6.5/8/4.5

Last edited by sar on 03-03-2005 at 01:37 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

just watched sample and seems a little bright in the office scene saying that by far best version of this movie have seen to date

8/8/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Definately not a TC. Download the DVDR version and you will see the entry screens etc.
9/10/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

have to agree on this one. stick to the telecine. its flawless and as good as it gets till retail.

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by xraycat
Definately not a TC. Download the DVDR version and you will see the entry screens etc.
9/10/?

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

check this out

TeleCine
Blade.Trinity.TELECINE.XviD-BMF
Blade.III.Trinity.SVCD.TELECINE-VideoCD
Blade.III.Trinity.DVDR.TELECiNE-NOX
Blade.Trinity.TELECINE.NTSC.DVDR-BMF

"DVDScreener"
Blade.Trinity.WS.DVDSCR.XviD-MoF
Blade.Trinity.DVDSCR.XViD.PROPER-DVL
Blade.Trinity.WS.DVD.SCREENER.SVCD-TEG-VCD
Blade.Trinity.WS.DVDSCR.DVDR.READ.NFO-TEG-DVD

http://img27.exs.cx/img27/6922/blade3tcvsdvdscr26iw.jpg

http://img229.exs.cx/img229/9334/bl...vsdvdscr4fh.jpg

As you can see on the screenshots, the quality of the wrong labeled "DVDSCR" is by far better. Nuke the "DVDSCR" for the mentioned reason, it won't change the fact that the "DVDSCR" is first choice... stupid rules

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yeah I think the previous user nailed it. Its either a good TC, or a Really Bad DVDSCR, because the quality is pretty bad for a DVDSCR. Blurry grainy and washed out. And yeah, cig burns.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

so from the fact that noone can decide if this is a tc or dvdscr, there must be NO b&w or property of... problems in this?

also, remember sky captain dvdscr? compared to final dvdrip, sky captains dvdscr looked like a tc too (it was way lower quality than the rip, the colours were also very washed out...)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Why is there an argument? an unwatermarked DVDSCR with cig burns doesnt even make sense, its obviously a TC. The quality is higher probably because its a different source.

__________________
iNFiNiTY

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i just downloaded the first rar to check quality, and yeah, this is definately a tc, NOT dvdscr...im not going to bother with this... just wait for the REAL dvdscr, or just the actual dvdrip to come out...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I wasn't aware you could preview rars from avi's, unless im missing something.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Redemption1980
I wasn't aware you could preview rars from avi's, unless im missing something.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this is def a tc no doubt about that - did they really think no1 wud notice?

still give it 7/9/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged