T-H-E-W-H-O
Jan 2003
 Senior Member
|
I have to disagree with a few things said about this rls.
1. its not a "waste" because they are still contributing to "the scene" or atleast whats left of it these days. *HOWEVER, they could have atleast made this INTERNAL. Imo, atleast they put out what they had acsess to/obtained. Thanks for that guys.
2. "credit whores" perhaps, but then again, wouldent you want to release something if your supplier tried hard to get his/her hands on it? Again, i would still say because of the better version it should have been internal, but none the less, atleast put out what you get ahold of.
3. "For starters , who the hell crops VHS screeners ...interlaced ...really blurry. Sound is really good.
The sample didnt appear to be interlaced for me, but if it was that should justify this being nuked. Atleast if a group is gonna pull of an old flick, make it properly encoded.
As based on the sample imo:
6/8/8
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|