judging from samle..
the vidoe is kinda dark, sound is okey, but I don't see why they made it to svcd, the quality ain't that good..

5/7/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quality isnt that good and whats that 2 black bars at the sides?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

another damn SVCD TS release for no reason.

to all the releasing groups

NOT EVERY TS HAS TO BE A SVCD

thanks

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

argh
no need for ANY other release of that piece of shit !

all "actors" should be banned and live in shame for that....

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

video ok (5), but sound is really bad(4)...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

SVCD because of scenes that could look really blocky in vcd2 when theres loads of movement does look better in SVCD, thats the only reason I would go for SVCD! whats every one else think! ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

think ill wait a bit longer for this. saw a review on TV yesterday they said it was utter shit and the actors that looked good actors where only good cos of there natural charisma and were pretty crappy anyway and it said apart from fast car chases there wasnt much too the film

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Sound is much better than the last release, video is decent but there certainly is no need for this to be svcd... Don't plan on watching the whole movie but if I did I would wait for a better release. 5/6/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

better rls and still the same crappy movie though.

6 / 6 / 1

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Come on guys. Theres no need for this svcd. It has to be at least be better quality both sound/picture before you can call svcd. unfortunatley this rls doesn't fall into that catagory.

Better luck next time

__________________
your never alone with Schizophrenia

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

True, it may not be worth being SVCD but it's still the best rls about right now.
Havent seen the whole movie but all i've heard is it's shit, think i'll have to see for myself though

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

better faster

nice audio nice video

the second one the better

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Going from the sample this release has good audio. The video is good for a SVCD TS could have been sharper and clearer maybe, but props for a fast good quality release ;-) play with the contrast or brightness since its a tad dark. This release is very watchable on my TV and it is not cropped to much to be noticed and it does not have a bad angle either, just could have been a little better with the sharpness and detail. Love the fact they had a some old classic muscle in this movie, only reason I watched it.

Rating this TS...
Video = 6 - 7
Audio = 8
Overall = 8 because it has a Hemi Challenger in it for some scenes otherwise a 6


Thanks for the 2fast release guys


Update: Just watched the whole movie and the left side is cropped some... not enough to ruin anything, but its there.
And the audio cuts out once or twice in the middle of the movie for a couple of seconds. There is a mild angle like its cocked to the right making the right bottom corner go down and the top left corner go up. Besides this the movie was very watchable and pretty good for a fast SVCD release

Not sure if this makes it a Cam but twice during the movie you can see peoples heads. Once when some stretches are something and later when a woman sits back down...

Last edited by NeVeRLiFt on 06-08-2003 at 10:36 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

one word - CAM.
video - 8 (as t/s's go , better than the previous release)
audio - 5 (cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam)
film 1
CTP show them how its done please!.

quote:

---

Its not a Cam
Its a WORKPRINT from a VHS source and was Videocaptured from that if you ask me.

---

__________________

Last edited by Butch on 06-08-2003 at 08:48 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Butch
one word - CAM.
video - 8 (as t/s's go , better than the previous release)
audio - 5 (cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam)
film 1
CTP show them how its done please!.

---

Its not a Cam
Its a WORKPRINT from a VHS source and was Videocaptured from that if you ask me.


EDIT
Some how I thought I was still in the Hulk thread.
My apologizes

Last edited by NeVeRLiFt on 06-08-2003 at 10:28 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i was kinda impressed with loGisTic's last release, for a new group not bad.

this 2 fast 2 furious release is very watchable compared to esoterics.

6/6/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

From the Sample - Dark , Dark , Dark, Colors are faded , and has that blurry tint to it like Finding Nemo FTF. The Sound Alright but has an echo to it. Watchable though. Compairing the two releases I'd take this one.

/me debates ... to pick up or not too

5/5/?

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

well..

I like it when a TS is in SVCD. I'm not too interested in seeing this movie though, This seems like a cam to me. Kinda shitty audio and dark and muddy but watchable video. Meh.

5/5/1

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

for all the people saying this movie sucks your not thinking. this movie isnt supposed to be a drama or whatever. people complained that in the first movie there wasnt enough car scenes so in this one there are more. i liked this movie. im into cars and this movie was about cars. you cant say the car chases werent good

7/5/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

2 releases of the same movie with bad audio...

video is better than eso although I don't think it warranted SVCD, audio, well, still sucks

Last edited by Ovrkill on 06-08-2003 at 06:22 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged