White Rabbit
Oct 2005
Senior Member
|
i usually think that any cam should be released as an svcd because they seem to look better. for example 'domino' by UNiTED was from the same source as FUCK, but UTi got it and released it as a vcd, and look how much more pixelated it is than any other releases done by FUCK.
however, was BaPH's release of 'Lord of war' worthy of an svcd? i think not. the 'quality' was a heap of shite, it had a horrible tilt and angle, fucking auto-brightness which kept changing from bright to dark in every scene. ARRGH i almost wanted to punch myself and i only got the sample! if it had been a vcd (smaller size) it wouldve been better as a temporary copy for most people but instead it had a friggin 1.8GB, waste of 3CDS, when a VCD couldve made it around the 1.1GB mark, and one less cd.
but if its a good source, SVCD is always better. ok UNiTED???
__________________
quote: Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:
compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.
encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|