^Om3n
Jan 2002
Senior Member
|
Reminds me of some old hbo cams, quite badly zoomed/copped.
Video 2-3 - badly zoomed and cropped as mentioned with people in the screen, but the image (that you can see) is your average cam, not too pixelated and no huge flicker so i think it deserves a little more than a 1 just for that, shame the camera man/woman hasn't got a clue.
Audio 4 - not great, again reminding me of some old hbo releases, audience noises and movement and so on, but you can at least hear the film fairly clearly. So again worth more than the 1/2 its been getting so far. (c'mon now, its not too quiet you can't hear, full of static or garbled like they were underwater)
I would recommend steering clear of this release both if you have been waiting for it and if not. Not worth it if your not ansy about seing the flick, and if you are it would probably ruin it for you.
Of corse, it seems a little ironic for such a release to come from a group that calls themself pride.
ps. seems to me people are being a little hard on cam audio these days, spoilt by dts disc's i suppose
__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?
Last edited by ^Om3n on 11-27-2005 at 02:05 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
11-26-2005 09:15 PM
This is making my very upset now.
