Mystic Slippers
Jul 2002
Registered
|
Dude, the movie is probably 'ok'. But what pisses me off is the fact that everyone will start going 'oh wow, the ring was great!', don't you mean ringu? someone will say, ''wtf is ringu?'' says mr./ms. mornoic trend-savvy sapion.
That's what pisses me off. The original is a world away from this hyped-up, glittery, candy-coated Hollywood nonsense. And it's just a shame that the original will now most like be quietly swept away.
If it was a movie of it's own right, and not a remake, i'd see it differently. But i loved the original trilogy, and from all the gossip i've heard about this film it seems like the director and crew have paid little to no respect to the originals.
I quote ThEiLlEsT "From what i understand only the concept of the tape and the girl are shared between the two movies while the rest is different ." Therefore meaning, for a movie that is supposed to be a remake, the director has extracted one key element and paid fuck all attention to the original movie. That blows, if your gonna do a remake do it properly. What he's basically done, in laymans terms is stolen one concept then made up an entirely new movie based around it in the hopes of passing it off as his own concept. I refer once again to the case of Tarantino, Resevoir Dogs and City On Fire. Blatant stealing. I reiterate my point, if the movie was completely original then yeah i'd love it. But it's not is it.
Once again, the Hollywood sector quietly strangles yet another ounce of talent with their garbage. It's a sad world. 
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|