Ripper
May 2002
Senior Member
|
quote: Originally posted by BIOHazard87
V: 9 - Could have been untouched, but looks good Only reason it didn't get a 10. It has one pretty long B&W scene in the beginning scene, then has various pretty short B&W scenes throughout the movie, and a Sony logo throughout the film. I zoomed in with my DVD Player to where it doesn't cut off much picture, but gets rid of the logo and it looks excellent I wish I watched the whole film like that.... instead of just like the last 1/4.
A: 8 - Could have been 5.1 DD, regardless this 2ch AC3 sounds good
M: 7 - I liked it Saul could have had a better actor though. I know that Seth was originally supposed to play the role of Saul, but apparently their current actor for him was "funnier to play the part."
The b&w scene at start is part of the film, when they are testing the effects of weed back in the 50's or 60's, i found this out myself on the xvid version also no paramount watermark on the xvid version i saw and pic was good till retail
Movie i really liked though
__________________
I was never caught!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|